New LS1 Owners - Newbie Tech Basic Technical Questions & Advice
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

I am sick of hearing Performance/Handling

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-22-2004, 10:39 PM
  #1  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
 
ActionJack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angry I am sick of hearing Performance/Handling

It is not so much that I am sick of hearing about Performance and Handling but rather I wanted more information.

I read Road/Kills allot and always hear some WRX or other chime in about how fast the WRX is or how it out performs everything in 'handling'. Well, I did allot of research on the web and results tend to vary a bit. Even with Motortrend where I got allot of info the same vehicle could vary slightly in the next report. I beleive this is due to external factors beyond the car itself: driver, weather, altitude, etc.

This is what I formulated:

2001 WS6 TA
0 to 60 5.0 sec
1/4 13.1 @ 107
skidpad .84g (another said .88g)
60 to 0 121 feet
600ft 66 mph


2004 GTO
0 to 60 5.3 sec
1/4 13.6 @ 105
skidpad .80g
60 to 0 120 feet
600ft 63.5 mph


2003 Cobra SVT
0 to 60 4.9 sec
1/4 13.1 @ 109
skidpad .85g
60 to 0 121 feet
600ft 64.1 mph


2003 C5 Corvette (sorry someone else can do the Z06)
0 to 60 4.7 sec
1/4 13 @ 110
skidpad .88g
60 to 0 115 feet
600ft 66.4 mph


2004 WRX STi
0 to 60 4.9 sec
1/4 13.2 @ 105
skidpad .9g
60 to 0 111 feet
600ft 69.1 mph


2003 EVO VIII
0 to 60 4.9 sec
1/4 13.1 @ 105
skidpad ???
60 to 0 106 feet
600ft 71.4 mph


*2002 Porsche GT2
0 to 60 3.8 sec
1/4 12.1 @ 120
skidpad ???
60 to 0 107 feet
600ft 68.3 mph


For those that want to call BS I will include many of the links I used. Or better yet. Call BS and provide your link to back it up. I welcome it
ActionJack is offline  
Old 05-22-2004, 10:42 PM
  #2  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
 
ActionJack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

LINKS:

link vette and cobra

link wrx and evo

link GTO

link to porsche

evo viii link

multiple links for wrx and other

ws6/ss link

ws6/ta link

ws6 link

few more to come. time for some zzzzz's

Last edited by ActionJack; 05-22-2004 at 11:18 PM.
ActionJack is offline  
Old 05-22-2004, 11:45 PM
  #3  
Restricted User
iTrader: (24)
 
Blakbird24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Fleetwood, PA
Posts: 1,398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

To anyone who thinks that an STI (or EVO...GOD I hate the EVO) is a better car than any of the LS1's I offer this 3-step remedy:

1 - Drive an STI (or...ugh...EVO)

2 - Then drive ANY LS1

3 - Then tell me with a straight face you would actually buy an STI or EVO over the LS1.

I'd bet money you can't.

I haven't driven the EVO (it's a mitsubishi...on that fact alone, in my mind, it's a write-off), but I very recently drove an STI...I think it's very over-hyped. Yeah it's damn fast, but it feels exactly like it is - an overpowed sedan. Just can't match the feel of a finely tuned sports car.

I need no links or proof to convince me of what my instincts told me from the beginning.
Blakbird24 is offline  
Old 05-23-2004, 12:00 AM
  #4  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
cjacks7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Baton Rouge
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

don't dog on the sti and the evo so bad, they are great cars to drive, but they are based off of a different format than a f-body. I do like my camaro more, but for an all around car my wrx was a better daily driver. The reason why I sold it was that the tranny was crap in it, and after it breaking 3 times in 9 months I was told no more warranty on the tranny so byebye subie, hello LS1.
cjacks7 is offline  
Old 05-23-2004, 12:24 AM
  #5  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
absolut_speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Illinois
Posts: 865
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Blakbird24
Yeah it's damn fast, but it feels exactly like it is - an overpowed sedan. Just can't match the feel of a finely tuned sports car.
You're insinuating an F-body is a finely tuned sports car?
absolut_speed is offline  
Old 05-23-2004, 01:40 AM
  #6  
Launching!
 
ChillnV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Wilmington, NC
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'll stick to my TWO-door sports car $hit on those family mobiles
ChillnV is offline  
Old 05-23-2004, 02:03 AM
  #7  
TECH Apprentice
 
Iv_z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 393
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ActionJack
2003 C5 Corvette (sorry someone else can do the Z06)
0 to 60 4.7 sec
1/4 13 @ 110
skidpad .88g
60 to 0 115 feet
600ft 66.4 mph


2003 EVO VIII
0 to 60 4.9 sec
1/4 13.1 @ 105
skidpad ???
60 to 0 106 feet
600ft 71.4 mph


*2002 Porsche GT2
0 to 60 3.8 sec
1/4 12.1 @ 120
skidpad ???
60 to 0 107 feet
600ft 68.3 mph


For those that want to call BS I will include many of the links I used. Or better yet. Call BS and provide your link to back it up. I welcome it
Yeah... I would call BS

Come on... Ok.. f-body's and vette's are crap. But do you seriosly really believe that EVO would beat GT2 in BRAKING and by 3MPH (!!!) in a SLALOM??

That just shows that magazines are being paid to produce results car makers would like you to believe. Pure marketing & deceptive advertisement. In this particular case it's pretty simple - Mitsubishi would like a certain group of people to believe that EVO is in the same class as some high-end porsches....
Iv_z28 is offline  
Old 05-23-2004, 08:19 PM
  #8  
TECH Regular
 
apathy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I would like to see you drive an Fbody through a wet road course, and then the WRX through the same course.

You don't think the f-body was intended to go down the drag strip?

I'm not defending any argument about better handling or a skidpad performance. But I'd pay you some bones if you could make a stock fbody run through that course faster than the stock WRX. Have you ever taken a RWD truck on ice/snow?

And I seriously hope those numbers AREN'T right, since the GT-2 is pretty much a supercar, from what I understand.
apathy is offline  
Old 05-23-2004, 08:25 PM
  #9  
TECH Regular
 
apathy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by absolut_speed
You're insinuating an F-body is a finely tuned sports car?
Or a sports car at all...
apathy is offline  
Old 05-23-2004, 11:54 PM
  #10  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
dubs6's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Dallas (Bush/Tollway)
Posts: 618
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

what nobody ever put into consideratoin here is looks. if a van ran a 12.8 stopped in 115 feet and pulled .9 gs would you buy it. f no
oh yeh and if my car was supposed to run a 13.1 stock what is wrong with me. i call bs on that and that only.

Last edited by dubs6; 05-23-2004 at 11:59 PM.
dubs6 is offline  
Old 05-24-2004, 12:01 AM
  #11  
Restricted User
iTrader: (24)
 
Blakbird24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Fleetwood, PA
Posts: 1,398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by apathy
I would like to see you drive an Fbody through a wet road course, and then the WRX through the same course.
Why do I always get this argument? Wet road course?! Think about what you say before you say it, because i'm sure you are not as dumb as you just sounded. When did we all of a sudden gain the need for a car that can carve corners in the snow? We'll be waiting for some time if that's the case because the WRX or any other AWD car for that matter "ain't gonna cut it". You think because it's AWD or better balanced (which it's not), it's going to handle the slalom or any set course better? WRONG. AWD improves all weather accelelration and control under acceleration...it can improve handling on dry pavement...but that's only because you *shouldn't* have to worry about overpowering the tires mid-turn. Other than that, it's the fact that the WRX is a smaller and more nimble car...and even then it barely bests the LS1, cause it's just too heavy - and that's the most important element to begin with. *** ANY CAR on a wet or snow covered course and it will perform abysmally. It's a simple matter of physics, the best tires, suspension and driveline in the world cannot change the laws of motion. A heavy car will handle like a heavy car, and driven hard in the rain, it's just a 3600lb death warrant.

Besides who cares how a car performs in the rain? Anyone who drives like that in the rain deserves whatever painful end they find. My T/A has seen rain twice in it's life, and I *** my best to keep that number where it's at.

Originally Posted by apathy
I'm not defending any argument about better handling or a skidpad performance. But I'd pay you some bones if you could make a stock fbody run through that course faster than the stock WRX. Have you ever taken a RWD truck on ice/snow?
See that's what I mean...how could you possibly have the need to outhandle and outrun ANY car in the rain? That's just ridiculous.
Blakbird24 is offline  
Old 05-24-2004, 01:10 AM
  #12  
TECH Apprentice
 
Iv_z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 393
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by apathy
Or a sports car at all...
Sure it's not. The only sports cars on the list are vette and GT2 (both RWD, BTW ). What's your point?
Iv_z28 is offline  
Old 05-24-2004, 01:19 AM
  #13  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (165)
 
boondiggys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NNJ
Posts: 799
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

he was so sick of hearing it that he had make others hear these terrible words rather than forget about it and make people argue about it....v8s alwasy gunna **** on the 4 bangers no matter what done deal
boondiggys is offline  
Old 05-24-2004, 02:25 AM
  #14  
TECH Resident
 
1BADFNZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Charleston SC
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

hmmm racing on a wet road course.... no thanks I'll pass with any car.
1BADFNZ is offline  
Old 05-24-2004, 04:56 AM
  #15  
z98
TECH Fanatic
 
z98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The EVO outbrakes every car on that lists?

THATS UNPOSSIBLE
z98 is offline  
Old 05-24-2004, 05:14 AM
  #16  
TECH Resident
 
1BADFNZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Charleston SC
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well if I remember right the Evo has Brembo's.... but still shouldn't out brake the Porsche
1BADFNZ is offline  
Old 05-24-2004, 06:00 AM
  #17  
Administrator
 
unit213's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 45,841
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by z98
The EVO outbrakes every car on that lists?

THATS UNPOSSIBLE
Unpossible?
unit213 is offline  
Old 05-24-2004, 06:36 AM
  #18  
TECH Resident
 
1BADFNZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Charleston SC
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

1BADFNZ is offline  
Old 05-24-2004, 07:08 AM
  #19  
TECH Addict
 
technical's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Fat Chance Hotel
Posts: 2,336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

There's one thing that's always been universal and that is...Porche's brakes are the best factory brakes in the industry. I have a jar full of old fillings to prove it.
technical is offline  
Old 05-24-2004, 08:14 AM
  #20  
TECH Fanatic
 
Dean-o's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: katy, tx
Posts: 1,399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If anyone thinks a WRX can out handle a Z06, they are smoking crack! A z06 is capable of over 1.0 latteral G thru corners. And we know it will crush a WRX in a straight line as well.
Dean-o is offline  


Quick Reply: I am sick of hearing Performance/Handling



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:13 PM.