New LS1 Owners - Newbie Tech Basic Technical Questions & Advice
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

K & N Air filter VS. Paper Air Filter ?!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-12-2007, 09:17 PM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
thaigleshmk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: MA
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default K & N Air filter VS. Paper Air Filter ?!

Guys... So I went to Advanced Auto part store today and I went to buy a new air filter and an oil to do an oil change...

The cashier asked me why I am not going w/ the K & N?. I told him that "it doesn't make any difference between the stock one and the K&N"

He says... Well come take a look at this, IT's a little machine that shows the difference between the fram filter vs the k&n w/ the little ping pong ball.

when he put the k&n in there, the ball flowed all the way to the top,

now when he put the stock paper filter in there, it flowed very very little..

So I just want some opinions about the difference between the stocker vs the k&n,

Does it really make that much difference?
Old 11-12-2007, 09:22 PM
  #2  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (6)
 
Daredevil_TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Fort Lewis, WA.
Posts: 538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I don't know if they flow more air, but to me its just more of a money saver-ive had the same air filter in my car for 3 years so its pretty much paid for itself already
Old 11-12-2007, 10:17 PM
  #3  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
Higgs Boson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 367
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Does it allow more air to flow through the filter? Yes.
Does a stock style K&N flow enough to make more power? No.

The K&N is reuseable. If a K&N is 50 bucks and a stock filter is 5 bucks and you change your filter every 10K miles then a K&N will only take 100,000 miles to pay for itself!

Is it worth it? Not in my opinion.

With that said, a full intake system is arguably worth it because it frees up the restrictions in the stock intake designed to keep it quiet and it allows a higher volume of air to be brought into the engine. With the stock system you still have a small opening. I am not sure they have a CAI for the LS1s though.... Just a lid.
Old 11-12-2007, 10:25 PM
  #4  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
thaigleshmk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: MA
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Higgs Boson
Does it allow more air to flow through the filter? Yes.
Does a stock style K&N flow enough to make more power? No.


The K&N is reuseable. If a K&N is 50 bucks and a stock filter is 5 bucks and you change your filter every 10K miles then a K&N will only take 100,000 miles to pay for itself!

Is it worth it? Not in my opinion.

With that said, a full intake system is arguably worth it because it frees up the restrictions in the stock intake designed to keep it quiet and it allows a higher volume of air to be brought into the engine. With the stock system you still have a small opening. I am not sure they have a CAI for the LS1s though.... Just a lid.
Great point! Thanks for clearing that up!
Old 11-12-2007, 11:28 PM
  #5  
((((((Administrator))))))
 
CRAGER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 29,404
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Higgs Boson
The K&N is reuseable. If a K&N is 50 bucks and a stock filter is 5 bucks and you change your filter every 10K miles then a K&N will only take 100,000 miles to pay for itself!..
Show me where you can buy a $5 filter for our car. ...and if there's a $5 filter I wouldn't use it.
I will/have put a K&N in every car I own.

Peace,
Craig.
Old 11-12-2007, 11:30 PM
  #6  
TECH Enthusiast
 
SOM02WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 666
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The K&N has been shown not to do any improvement and in some cases over oiling can cause damage to the MAF...
Old 11-13-2007, 12:11 AM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
 
JohnnyC's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The 'Burgh, PA
Posts: 1,135
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Both the K&N and paper are fine. The K&N is re-useable and works great if you follow the instuctions and don't over-oil it. Neither will give you a great power boost, so I use the K&N so I can re-use it. This argument will never end, so spend your brain power on other issues.
Old 11-13-2007, 12:14 AM
  #8  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
waldershrek's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: NY
Posts: 2,516
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SOM02WS6
The K&N has been shown not to do any improvement and in some cases over oiling can cause damage to the MAF...

That's a user issue and is no way the fault of the filter. Follow your directions and you will more than happy with the K&N.
Old 11-13-2007, 12:18 AM
  #9  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
thaigleshmk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: MA
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Yeah guys, that's what I figured.. that's why I keep buying the regular paper filter...
Old 11-13-2007, 02:24 AM
  #10  
Launching!
iTrader: (8)
 
candidate zero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Tampa, Fl
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I use a paper filter. Most guys I know do.
Old 11-13-2007, 02:27 AM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
 
Camaro Ryder KV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: South Burbs of Chicago
Posts: 1,593
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

ur maf will only let in so much air (which is what it is tuned to do) paper for me!
Old 11-13-2007, 02:32 AM
  #12  
TECH Enthusiast
 
crazboy99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Powder Springs, GA
Posts: 564
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

i have put a k&n in every vehicle ive ever owned from my first car (88 escort) to my camaro...to date i havent seen a more user friendly filter that flows better than a k&n...its almost like trying to breath through a straw everyday then doing it without the straw...just my $.02
Old 11-13-2007, 06:44 AM
  #13  
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
ws6pewter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

My K&N was too oily right out of the box and caused the car to idle strange after 8-10k miles. At least I guess it was the K&N since i cleaned the MAF and all is well now. The car has a total of 27,000 miles so I don't think that it was just normal build up on the MAF. Anyway I'm back to paper and no ill effects.
Old 11-13-2007, 08:18 AM
  #14  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Benjamin Russick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chesapeake, VA
Posts: 1,493
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

The K&N doesn't make any more power (I tried it on the dyno), doesn't fit all that well and, in my personal experience, doesn't filter as well as a clean Fram. I like K&N for conical filters, but not flat-panel...
Old 11-13-2007, 08:34 AM
  #15  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
LS1 Melly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I have a K&N in my Mustang and Ranger... and they've both paid for themselves now for the 6 years I've had them! Paper Filters are FTL.
Old 11-13-2007, 09:00 AM
  #16  
LS1Tech Administrator
iTrader: (3)
 
RPM WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Posts: 32,040
Likes: 0
Received 1,492 Likes on 1,074 Posts

Default

Paper filters do a much better job of filtering air.

Back to back oil tests have shown this, with higher silicon (dirt) content when K&N type filters are used.

Paper for me, since K&N offers no real world power gains in an LS1 style intake setup, and offers lesser filtering abilities.
Old 11-13-2007, 10:15 AM
  #17  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Jon5212's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Indianapolis Indiana
Posts: 1,299
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Did this test show any negatives against engine longevity? I use a K&N and I don't see any gains in using it, but what are the drawbacks? Is my motor going to blow up because I used a K&N filter?
Old 11-13-2007, 10:25 AM
  #18  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
Higgs Boson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 367
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by CRAGER
Show me where you can buy a $5 filter for our car. ...and if there's a $5 filter I wouldn't use it.
I will/have put a K&N in every car I own.

Peace,
Craig.
I have no idea how much they are. Let me check.

Ok 17 dollars. So it would only take 30K miles to pay for itself at 10K mile changes and if you do 15K mile changes it would take 45K miles to pay for itself.
Old 11-13-2007, 10:32 AM
  #19  
LS1Tech Administrator
iTrader: (3)
 
RPM WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Posts: 32,040
Likes: 0
Received 1,492 Likes on 1,074 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Higgs Boson
I have no idea how much they are. Let me check.

Ok 17 dollars. So it would only take 30K miles to pay for itself at 10K mile changes and if you do 15K mile changes it would take 45K miles to pay for itself.
I pay $10 for a Fram.
Old 11-13-2007, 10:35 AM
  #20  
Launching!
 
jag42420's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Read this: http://duramax-diesel.com/spicer/index.htm . Like all other independant testing results I've seen, it shows the K&N filter does not filter as well as a paper filter.

Besides the fact that over-oiling will cause you to have to clean your MAF, K&N may 'out flow' a paper filter. Naturally aspirated engines really don't use any more air than what paper filters can deliver, and airboxes are designed for more surface area than needed to compensate for dirt to allow more airflow than needed on a stock filter. Therefore, the K&N's 'extra flow' is useless.

All that said, I do like the K&N intake kits, which are guaranteed to make more HP. Not because of the filter, but because of their better design. If the K&N drop in filters were really all that, K&N would extend it's guarantee to them too. Think about it.

From K&N's own website concerning replacement filters:
"2. What increase in horsepower should I see from a K&N replacement filter?

We perform internal dyno (power curve) testing on all our product designs. Our replacement filters are designed to provide up to 4 horsepower. Your results will vary depending on your vehicle, driving habits, load on the engine (towing for example), existing air system restriction, and other factors."

In comparison to their intake kit claims:
"K&N Intake Kits are Guaranteed to Increase Power!

Every Intake Kit we design has been tested on a Dynamometer and proven to increase horsepower. We measure horsepower at the wheels. The horsepower rating that may have been on the window sticker when your car was new is often a measurement of horsepower at the engine and there can be a loss of horsepower through the drive train by the time it reaches the wheels.

K&N hereby warrants and guaranties to the original retail purchaser of any K&N air intake kit that the vehicle on which the air intake system is installed will gain an increase in horsepower, or K&N will refund the purchase price, including sales tax, to the retail purchaser, subject to the following terms and conditions:
The K&N air intake system must have been properly installed on the vehicle in accordance with the included K&N instructions.
The system must be the correct part number for the vehicle upon which it was installed.
The vehicle must be in good running condition.
The vehicle must undergo a dynamometer test both before and after the installation of the system, with no changes to the vehicle, except for the installation of the kit. The dyno tests must be performed by the same testing facility and must be performed within 30 days of one another and within 60 days of the date of purchase. The test results or work order for each test must reflect the name and address of the vehicle owner or operator having the test performed; the year, make, model and mileage of the vehicle being tested; and the horsepower results from both tests.
If the dyno tests show that the vehicle did not gain an increase in horsepower, then the retail purchaser must return the complete air intake system to K&N in its original packaging, together with his or her proof of purchase, the ORIGINALS of the two dyno tests statement requesting a refund in accordance with our Horsepower Guarantee. Upon receipt of all of the foregoing, K&N will refund the full purchase price, including sales tax, to the original retail purchaser.
This guaranty does not apply to any other costs incurred by the purchase, including, but not limited to, the dyno tests, parts and labor for the installation and removal of the air intake system, shipping costs, rental car, loss of use or incidental damages, if any, and K&N expressly disclaims any and all liability for same. "

They have a HP guarantee on their kits, which generally achieve their gains through more free flowing tubing, but there is no guarantee on a replacement filter. I think that alone speaks for itself.


Quick Reply: K & N Air filter VS. Paper Air Filter ?!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:28 PM.