New LS1 Owners - Newbie Tech Basic Technical Questions & Advice
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Which SFC's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-24-2008, 09:33 AM
  #1  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
adidazman15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Which SFC's

I have an 02 trans am M6
my mods are - SLP Loudmouth (soon to be a magnaflow)
SLP Lid
American Racing Headers and ORY
(CAM/Tune + Pulley coming soon)

Can I get away with tubular I should be making around 400rwhp when the car is finished.
Old 03-24-2008, 09:42 AM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Z Fury's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 1,595
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

I've been doing some reading in the suspension/braking section, and have come to learn that SFCs don't do as much as I had originally thought. They will keep the frame more rigid, but rigidity shouldn't be an issue unless you are doing radical things (and 400 hp isn't radical) or unless the car has been wrecked before. Not to say they are a bad mod, just not an absolute necessity.

That said, I'm running the UMI 3-point tubular SFCs, and have no issue at all. If I had it to do over again, I would have spent the money elsewhere first, such as LCAs, adjustable panhard, etc.
Old 03-24-2008, 10:04 AM
  #3  
((((((Administrator))))))
 
CRAGER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 29,404
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

SFC's are a good mod, and 400rwhp you will get flex. If you have stock hp and maybe want to autocross then that is the only reason you might not want them. If you ever plan to hook, and more so with 400rwhp get them.

The tubular ones are fine, I have them and I push 551rwhp.

Peace,
Craig.
Old 03-24-2008, 10:45 AM
  #4  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (35)
 
Spd-Kilz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Rack City
Posts: 3,427
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Which ones are more rigid? The boxed ones, or the tubular?
Old 03-24-2008, 11:13 AM
  #5  
((((((Administrator))))))
 
CRAGER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 29,404
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The boxed ones are, nice avatar btw! lol

Peace,
Craig.
Old 03-24-2008, 12:16 PM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Z Fury's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 1,595
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

3pt vs. 2pt. SFCs
This is kind of an old thread, but it shows you where I'm basing my response from. The SFCs are a great mod if you are running stock suspension, but not necessary if you upgrade to a better suspension.
Old 03-24-2008, 12:29 PM
  #7  
((((((Administrator))))))
 
CRAGER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 29,404
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Wrong, with power and traction will come flex. No matter what springs/shocks you have.

Peace,
Craig.
Old 03-24-2008, 12:33 PM
  #8  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
 
LS1crazy01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: ILLINOIS
Posts: 1,193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Sub frame connectors are great for even stock power. They make your car pick up more evenly. I put them on after I did lid,cat back, and rear control arms. I have BMR boxed and welded ones that I got from Speed Inc. I love them. Makes a huge handling difference on the car.
Old 03-24-2008, 12:35 PM
  #9  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (5)
 
teke184's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Key West, Florida
Posts: 3,183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i put my boxed SFC on the car at 45K miles when i got the car. i felt an IMMEDIATE difference over uneven roads...particularly on bridges (i live near LOTS of them).

the small "dips" formed from each section of the bridge created a pretty good test area.

i could feel the car's suspension working more, the body was flexing less and absorbing less.

to me it almost seemed liek the ride got rougher....since the body wasn't absorbing as much, the shortcomings of a 45K mile stock suspension really shined through.

i say they are a GREAT mod. and i'm not convinced you'll ever notice a difference between the different kinds.

supposedly the boxed version hang lower, but on my car they were not the lowest part.

i have quite a few install pics on page 3 of my website in the signature
Old 03-24-2008, 12:49 PM
  #10  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Z Fury's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 1,595
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by CRAGER
Wrong, with power and traction will come flex. No matter what springs/shocks you have.

Peace,
Craig.
SFCs won't eliminate flex either. They help eliminate it, but no car is 100% rigid. This is per Steve Strano, whom I tend to believe when it comes to suspension/chasis issues on these cars.

I'll support my point no more. I'm not saying they are a bad mod at all, but if I had to do it all over again, I'd go with suspension mods before I'd get SFCs.
Old 03-24-2008, 12:50 PM
  #11  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (47)
 
1Loudz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: BAY AREA CA
Posts: 711
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

tubular Global West SFCs. great clearance if youre lowered.
Old 03-24-2008, 12:51 PM
  #12  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
 
LS1crazy01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: ILLINOIS
Posts: 1,193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Z Fury
SFCs won't eliminate flex either. They help eliminate it, but no car is 100% rigid. This is per Steve Strano, whom I tend to believe when it comes to suspension/chasis issues on these cars.

I'll support my point no more. I'm not saying they are a bad mod at all, but if I had to do it all over again, I'd go with suspension mods before I'd get SFCs.

Yah I agree. No car is 100% but you can get pretty close. I also have a BMR strut tower brace wich also helps out a bit.
Old 03-24-2008, 01:02 PM
  #13  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
Snowman2K1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Southern Cali
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i have slp sfc
Old 03-24-2008, 01:13 PM
  #14  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
TXZ28LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Classified
Posts: 6,164
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

i plan on goin with some hotchkis SFC
Old 03-24-2008, 06:24 PM
  #15  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
adidazman15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I am going to used boxed, you never know what lies ahead and I don't want to cut something out I already welded.
Old 03-24-2008, 06:57 PM
  #16  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
WS6addiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Lincoln, Ne
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

From what I've read on here, the 4th gens. are alot more rigid than they used to be. But back in the day it was a rule of thumb that if you were pushing 300+ rwhp and dumping the clutch in ANY unibody you NEED sfcs. Failure to use them resulted in a buckled floorpan under the back seat.

Just a little food for thought.
Old 03-24-2008, 07:26 PM
  #17  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (96)
 
01ssreda4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Turnin' Wrenches Infractions: 005
Posts: 24,241
Likes: 0
Received 79 Likes on 70 Posts

Default

the ability to jack your car up from anywhere along the side is awesome. i cringe when i see or hear the door/doors twist. they are worth every penny.
Old 03-27-2008, 01:31 PM
  #18  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (4)
 
SS#1531's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Alamogordo, NM
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

They are worth it no matter what power you are putting down. I noticed an immediate improvement in ride and handling.
Old 03-27-2008, 01:48 PM
  #19  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
 
CranMaro99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Washington
Posts: 1,444
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by CRAGER
SFC's are a good mod, and 400rwhp you will get flex. If you have stock hp and maybe want to autocross then that is the only reason you might not want them. If you ever plan to hook, and more so with 400rwhp get them.

The tubular ones are fine, I have them and I push 551rwhp.

Peace,
Craig.
Why are SFC's bad for autocross?
Old 03-27-2008, 02:10 PM
  #20  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
 
LS1crazy01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: ILLINOIS
Posts: 1,193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I think you would be stupid not to use them for Auto cross! It handles so much better with them.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:18 PM.