Nitrous Oxide Installation | Tuning | Products
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Direct Port, stand alone fuel writeup!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-30-2003, 11:44 PM
  #1  
The Bull
Thread Starter
 
DERTY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 3,578
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default Direct Port, stand alone fuel writeup!

Due to popular requests I started putting together a decent writeup on my install. A lot of credit goes to Reckless and FSTR-THANU for the ideas that went into my setup. You can tell that each of ours are pretty identical, but it's hard to do these sorts of things any different when they are done right.

http://www.derty.org/?body=Installs&content=directport

Let me know what you think or what you would like to see some more of.

Last edited by DERTY; 12-31-2003 at 07:38 AM.
Old 12-31-2003, 06:39 AM
  #2  
11 Second Club
 
EVIL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Hanover MD
Posts: 1,645
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

good stuff steve!

RECKLESS directport......
Old 12-31-2003, 07:09 AM
  #3  
Super Moderator
iTrader: (9)
 
Reckless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Canton, GA
Posts: 10,052
Received 32 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Nice write-up Steve! Much more thorough than mine
Old 12-31-2003, 10:03 AM
  #4  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (10)
 
turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: TX
Posts: 680
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Thanks Derty!
Old 12-31-2003, 10:09 AM
  #5  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
gomer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The Confederacy
Posts: 3,063
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Great writeup! I've got that same type system on my Mustang, it is the only way to go IMO.
Old 12-31-2003, 10:33 AM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
99taws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Killeen, Texas
Posts: 1,655
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Nice write up, how about a link to larger pics?
Old 12-31-2003, 10:40 AM
  #7  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (9)
 
Vents's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Texas, it's like your state, but better.
Posts: 2,085
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

i really love the detailed parts list. it make sit MUCH easier to esimate, and track down all those dastardly lil fittings, tubing, ect ect.. those are a serious pain.

good job Derty.

BTW, why didnt ya add it all up?
Old 12-31-2003, 10:44 AM
  #8  
The Bull
Thread Starter
 
DERTY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 3,578
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

I did, it's $600 bucks roughly. Give or take 20 bucks. Depending on those damn -8 fittings you'll easily save 100 bucks if you simply find a way to use straight fittings instead of the angled ones. But it in my case it looks nice and I'd rather have something that's nice instead of ghetto.

I'll fix the pictures right now and give you a couple larger ones.
Old 12-31-2003, 10:49 AM
  #9  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (9)
 
Vents's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Texas, it's like your state, but better.
Posts: 2,085
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

i did notice those being un-Godly expensive. i'll find some way to pass on those. but i definately like that triangle cell. very nice piece. how many passes do you see out of that one? 1 gal?

all things considered equal, for 100 bucks cheaper? i'll take 1 ghetto please.
Old 12-31-2003, 10:57 AM
  #10  
The Bull
Thread Starter
 
DERTY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 3,578
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

I can get about 2 solids passes out of it with a 200 shot. 300 Doesn't use much more either. This fuel cell is about 2/3 of a gallon or so. Provided that the rest of the car supplies all the fuel to the motor this size cell hasn't been a problem at all.

I personally top it off after every pass and flow check it each time. Only for my own self confidence that I'm not going to blow anything up due to lack of fuel and the right pressure!

Larger pictures are now there. Just click on the smaller photos.
Old 12-31-2003, 11:13 AM
  #11  
On The Tree
 
mbaskett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Flower Mound, TX
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Great writeup! I gotta admit, though. I'm with Vince on the ghetto vs. $$$ factor... if $100 can be saved by using straight fittings, then I'll deal with that and it not looking as purddy....

I can buy a couple of bottle fills for $100

I do have one question though... wouldn't the most desireable place for the regulator be as close to the 'noids as possible, so that you can elimnate as much air in the fule line up to the noids as possible? Just curious... I know it'd add more clutter of fuel lines and such, but is that very brief time of running lean at the beginning of the shot or it's elimination thereof worth the relocation of the regulator?
Old 12-31-2003, 11:21 AM
  #12  
The Bull
Thread Starter
 
DERTY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 3,578
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

The return line to the tank is in there to bleed off the air for that very reason. . When you stand buy the tank and have someone kick it on you can hear the air rush into the tank if you listen closely. Even on my A/F charts we've never seen any initial lean or rich conditions with this setup. We do see increasing lean conditions over a pull when the return line jet is too large with the larger shots. That's what made me decide to either tighten up the jet size like I recommended or to get a larger pump. 140 GPH just can't sustain fuel flow through 9 .031 jets at 9.5 PSI!

Other then that it simply comes on like a freight train and I just have to shift. This motor has at least 50 nitrous passes on it and it hasn't shown any significant issues.
Old 12-31-2003, 11:46 AM
  #13  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (9)
 
Vents's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Texas, it's like your state, but better.
Posts: 2,085
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

cool..

thats good info on the pump stuff. i feel a TON better about my setup now having heard that. i think i'll start w/ a blue pump for my measly lil 2 stage system then.
Old 12-31-2003, 01:02 PM
  #14  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
BTL FED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: DFW
Posts: 1,245
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DERTY
The return line to the tank is in there to bleed off the air for that very reason. . When you stand buy the tank and have someone kick it on you can hear the air rush into the tank if you listen closely. Even on my A/F charts we've never seen any initial lean or rich conditions with this setup. We do see increasing lean conditions over a pull when the return line jet is too large with the larger shots. That's what made me decide to either tighten up the jet size like I recommended or to get a larger pump. 140 GPH just can't sustain fuel flow through 9 .031 jets at 9.5 PSI!

Other then that it simply comes on like a freight train and I just have to shift. This motor has at least 50 nitrous passes on it and it hasn't shown any significant issues.
Would it work better if you moved the fitting and the return line right before the noid? so when you hit the button there is already fuel at the noid
Old 12-31-2003, 01:24 PM
  #15  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (9)
 
Vents's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Texas, it's like your state, but better.
Posts: 2,085
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

well, technically, just priming the system would be ideal, but that'd have to be done before the system was run.

definately something to look into. design it and make eleventy-billion dollars.
Old 12-31-2003, 02:53 PM
  #16  
The Bull
Thread Starter
 
DERTY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 3,578
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Fluid dynamics don't work that way. Basically put the density of fuel is greater then air. As fuel pushes against the closed noid it is displaced and will find the path of least resistance. Granted fuel will try and find that exit too, same laws apply. But if you have the pump running for a little bit before your run you should be fine. I turn mine on just after the burnout. Also, flow checking the system does help prime the line but doesn't prevent long term reversion back to the tank.
Old 01-04-2004, 11:54 AM
  #17  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
MARKSZ71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: bama bitch
Posts: 1,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

u did great
Old 01-05-2004, 11:19 AM
  #18  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
Black Sunshine/ 00SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,161
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Beautiful!!
Old 01-07-2004, 10:32 PM
  #19  
10 Second Club
 
taqwache's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: H-town
Posts: 1,884
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

thats a great write up. i ran this type of fuel system on my 69 and had zero problems, but i only ran a blue pump. the system was a MrBig shot and even at the 350 seting i did not have any fuel pressure drop problems but i did have major tracion problems and i decided to just spray a 225. i would say that a black pump would be extra insurance but the blue pump is plenty enough at least for NOS kits. i also had another blue pump for the motor and it was makeing 500rwhp without any problems.
Old 01-08-2004, 06:53 AM
  #20  
The Bull
Thread Starter
 
DERTY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 3,578
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Yeah, like I said a blue will probably be fine for lower pressure tunes like NOS at 6 PSI or so. But at 10 PSI which is where NX jets their fuel it doesn't keep up, but a black will. Just check with the manufacturer for their recommendations on the minimum GPH that their system requires and you should be safe.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:18 AM.