opinions on this kit
08-03-2012, 08:07 PM
#1
opinions on this kit I bought it a while back ago and was told yesterday that this kit had problems with interrupting the fuel injector. Has anyone personally used this? Also was told that tuning would be an issue. I just want to see if its worth installing or not.
The first pic is what it looks like installed, I found it doing a search.
These bottom two is the actual kit i bought.
The first pic is what it looks like installed, I found it doing a search.
These bottom two is the actual kit i bought.
08-03-2012, 08:27 PM
#2
I don't see why it would be any different than a direct port with the injectors 2" away?
It should have BETTER fuel atomization than a traditional direct port since the fuel and nitrous are all atomizing at one place instead of in different places in the runner. The phase change(where nitrous changes from liquid to gas) will take place in the combustion chamber and no where else. with this set-up should give you the hardest 'hit' of power than anywhere else since it hasn't had a chance to expand and change phases anywhere else until it gets to the combustion chamber.
Granted there aren't several sharp 90's stacked one after another like in your solenoids input/output and in the bottle valve itself.
It should have BETTER fuel atomization than a traditional direct port since the fuel and nitrous are all atomizing at one place instead of in different places in the runner. The phase change(where nitrous changes from liquid to gas) will take place in the combustion chamber and no where else. with this set-up should give you the hardest 'hit' of power than anywhere else since it hasn't had a chance to expand and change phases anywhere else until it gets to the combustion chamber.
Granted there aren't several sharp 90's stacked one after another like in your solenoids input/output and in the bottle valve itself.
08-03-2012, 08:46 PM
#3
I don't see why it would be any different than a direct port with the injectors 2" away?
It should have BETTER fuel atomization than a traditional direct port since the fuel and nitrous are all atomizing at one place instead of in different places in the runner. The phase change(where nitrous changes from liquid to gas) will take place in the combustion chamber and no where else. with this set-up should give you the hardest 'hit' of power than anywhere else since it hasn't had a chance to expand and change phases anywhere else until it gets to the combustion chamber.
Granted there aren't several sharp 90's stacked one after another like in your solenoids input/output and in the bottle valve itself.
It should have BETTER fuel atomization than a traditional direct port since the fuel and nitrous are all atomizing at one place instead of in different places in the runner. The phase change(where nitrous changes from liquid to gas) will take place in the combustion chamber and no where else. with this set-up should give you the hardest 'hit' of power than anywhere else since it hasn't had a chance to expand and change phases anywhere else until it gets to the combustion chamber.
Granted there aren't several sharp 90's stacked one after another like in your solenoids input/output and in the bottle valve itself.
08-03-2012, 11:44 PM
#5
11 Second Club
iTrader: (98)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Frederick, Maryland
Posts: 453
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My first stage of direct port on my car is those nozzles. They work great. I had them on my FAST 90 intake and they worked great. I now have them on a Vic Jr. intake they they seal great on that intake as well. Tuning was just fine with them. You will like them, I would say use the kit for sure.
08-04-2012, 05:36 PM
#7
TECH Resident
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 942
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Was wondering the same thing because I found a couple of the NOS brand direct port under injector ones Cheap. Still wonder how they would hide under LTx corvette fuel rail covers 
& will they do a 300 shot easy. Not tryin to hijack your post!!! Just figured it might help get more input....
& will they do a 300 shot easy. Not tryin to hijack your post!!! Just figured it might help get more input.... Trending Topics
08-04-2012, 09:55 PM
#9
What intake are you using with that, reason I ask is the nos nossle kit had problems when being used on a fast intake... It would cause the injectors to leak.. Everyone I know that had one of those on an ls6 then swapped on a fast had to ditch the nossle, and out a soft plume nozzle in the bung of the fast intake...
08-04-2012, 09:56 PM
#10
My first stage of direct port on my car is those nozzles. They work great. I had them on my FAST 90 intake and they worked great. I now have them on a Vic Jr. intake they they seal great on that intake as well. Tuning was just fine with them. You will like them, I would say use the kit for sure.
08-04-2012, 11:36 PM
#11
11 Second Club
iTrader: (98)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Frederick, Maryland
Posts: 453
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Was wondering the same thing because I found a couple of the NOS brand direct port under injector ones Cheap. Still wonder how they would hide under LTx corvette fuel rail covers & will they do a 300 shot easy. Not tryin to hijack your post!!! Just figured it might help get more input....
& will they do a 300 shot easy. Not tryin to hijack your post!!! Just figured it might help get more input....Look into switching to a top mounted 4 barrel throttle body with a speed density tune. You will get much better results.
08-05-2012, 09:01 AM
#12
Was wondering the same thing because I found a couple of the NOS brand direct port under injector ones Cheap. Still wonder how they would hide under LTx corvette fuel rail covers & will they do a 300 shot easy. Not tryin to hijack your post!!! Just figured it might help get more input....
& will they do a 300 shot easy. Not tryin to hijack your post!!! Just figured it might help get more input....
08-05-2012, 06:30 PM
#13
This is also an option for me. The ONLY reason I really wanted an elbow was that I bought an SS roller with a sunoco hood. I really hate it when people run huge hoods but have nothing under it to require that big thing. It just looks I might be falling into that category now though.
08-06-2012, 01:13 AM
#14
11 Second Club
iTrader: (98)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Frederick, Maryland
Posts: 453
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This is also an option for me. The ONLY reason I really wanted an elbow was that I bought an SS roller with a sunoco hood. I really hate it when people run huge hoods but have nothing under it to require that big thing. It just looks I might be falling into that category now though.
