HSW Sudden impact wet dyno results
06-19-2006, 03:34 AM
#1
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: bellevue ne
Posts: 692
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
HSW Sudden impact wet dyno results*pics* Previous numbers with the nos 5177 kit were
50 shot- 404hp/492tq
90 shot- 440hp/586tq
na-348/358
HSW sudden impact single nozzle
100 shot 424.9hp/525.2tq
150 shot 442.9hp/568.9tq(1st pull)
150 shot 445.5/525.2
Bottle pressure was 1050 on all nitrous pulls. 100 shot was half bottle, for the 150s we filled the bottle.
No clue as to why the 150shot was so low
I was gunning for 500/500. Didnt happen, not sure why I only gained 20hp with the 150shot.5300rpms 445hp a/f was 11.1. I'll host the the graphs later on with vid.
Anyone have a clue why the 150shot only gave me 100horse yet 220tq?
The torque was there for the 150s, but the hp was not
50 shot- 404hp/492tq
90 shot- 440hp/586tq
na-348/358
HSW sudden impact single nozzle
100 shot 424.9hp/525.2tq
150 shot 442.9hp/568.9tq(1st pull)
150 shot 445.5/525.2
Bottle pressure was 1050 on all nitrous pulls. 100 shot was half bottle, for the 150s we filled the bottle.
No clue as to why the 150shot was so low
I was gunning for 500/500. Didnt happen, not sure why I only gained 20hp with the 150shot.5300rpms 445hp a/f was 11.1. I'll host the the graphs later on with vid.Anyone have a clue why the 150shot only gave me 100horse yet 220tq?
The torque was there for the 150s, but the hp was not Last edited by JCurtin; 06-19-2006 at 04:02 PM.
06-19-2006, 10:38 AM
#3
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Southern NH
Posts: 1,644
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I noticed that too. hmmm
Do you have a window switch?
The reason I ask is if the systems were activated at the same PRM or not.
Do you have a window switch?
The reason I ask is if the systems were activated at the same PRM or not.
Originally Posted by NOTFAST
Weird that a 90 dry gave you more hp/tq than a 100 wet...
06-19-2006, 01:06 PM
#5
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: bellevue ne
Posts: 692
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 860 Performance
I noticed that too. hmmm
Do you have a window switch?
The reason I ask is if the systems were activated at the same PRM or not.
Do you have a window switch?
The reason I ask is if the systems were activated at the same PRM or not.
06-19-2006, 02:10 PM
#6
FormerVendor
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Glenolden, PA
Posts: 2,056
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm not saying that's the cause of it; just take it into consideration that it will affect power output. When you can please email me some dyno graphs. Or give us a call/PM and we can go over some things. Or I'll send you a PM in a sec.
Thanks,
Matt
Thanks,
Matt
Trending Topics
06-19-2006, 09:57 PM
#10
IM not Matt but im wiling to tell you what I see wrong right off the bat.
On the 150 hp pull that you made 445 on your set up was to Rich. Being to rich side can cost you HP. WE tune our set ups for 11.8 air fuel across the board.
See if you can get your air fuel there and it may help.
Dave
On the 150 hp pull that you made 445 on your set up was to Rich. Being to rich side can cost you HP. WE tune our set ups for 11.8 air fuel across the board.
See if you can get your air fuel there and it may help.
Dave
06-20-2006, 01:42 AM
#13
Restricted User
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sierra Vista, AZ
Posts: 7,603
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yep. And JC no way you'd pull that kind of torque with the dry kit running "lean". Torque likes more fuel, Horsepower like a little less. Was the tuning changed at all, if not, definately play with it some and dial in the AFR, timing etc.. GL
Charlie
Charlie
06-20-2006, 05:47 AM
#14
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: bellevue ne
Posts: 692
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by CAT3
Yep. And JC no way you'd pull that kind of torque with the dry kit running "lean". Torque likes more fuel, Horsepower like a little less. Was the tuning changed at all, if not, definately play with it some and dial in the AFR, timing etc.. GL
Charlie
Charlie
06-20-2006, 05:48 AM
#15
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: bellevue ne
Posts: 692
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by JCurtin
Oh yes way there is. I'm at work, when I get home I'll take a pic of the dry 50 shot printout, and I'll up the vid of the 90shot and you will clearly see 439hp/586tq.
06-20-2006, 07:49 AM
#17
TECH Resident
iTrader: (48)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Michigan, the land of cold
Posts: 927
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dyno graphs I entered the data from those runs into Excel. Shoot me an email and I'll send you over the entire spreadsheet.
That black line sloping down is a linear trendline.
That black line sloping down is a linear trendline.
06-20-2006, 10:02 AM
#18
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: bellevue ne
Posts: 692
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by oange ss
told you to do that last year......those jets are a little fat for the shot your runnin and it looks like the the juice is cutting off at 4300 rpms
and yes I did listen to you finally. The slp maf was good for exactly 4 horses and 6tq, so it seems.
06-20-2006, 12:22 PM
#19
Restricted User
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sierra Vista, AZ
Posts: 7,603
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by JCurtin
a/f was changed, also ditched the slp maf I was using for a stocker.
Whats this mean, you were lean and went rich or were rich and went lean? I'll be waiting for a pic of the graph with AFR on the 90 jets. Interesting to say the least.
