PCM Diagnostics & Tuning HP Tuners | Holley | Diablo
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

2006 CTS-V vs 2010 Camaro Timing Tables

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-07-2014, 07:41 PM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
InfrareV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Lakeville, MN
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 2006 CTS-V vs 2010 Camaro Timing Tables

I have a 2006 CTS-V with a LSA top end, the weight between my car and an LS3 Camaro are pretty similar. I was wondering what people thought about copying the timing tables from a stock Camaro config and working from there. It seems to me GM put more thought into the Camaro tables, they seem to rely heavier on the IAT tables and the trend I see in the CTS-V file doesn't make a lot of sense to me. There is an "island" of timing added around 68 degrees and 0.76 g/cyl that doesn't seem to trend with the rest of the table, the Camaro config however seems to be much more thoroughly populated and follows a fairly smooth pattern when graphed in 3d.

I've included my current tune, the tune I received from a local shop prior to installing headers, and my factory tune for anyone who would care to take a look. I had to zip them due to the file size limitation. I've been using the Camaro tune included with the Editor for comparison.
Attached Files
File Type: zip
Tunes(HPT).zip (3.87 MB, 6 views)



Quick Reply: 2006 CTS-V vs 2010 Camaro Timing Tables



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:54 PM.