PCM Diagnostics & Tuning HP Tuners | Holley | Diablo
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Help with adding fuel at WOT

Old 11-23-2016, 04:30 PM
  #21  
Moderator
 
mrvedit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 7,043
Received 385 Likes on 294 Posts

Default

Note: I deleted the comments and posts related to JoeNova's unfortunately typo in post #2.
Old 11-24-2016, 03:26 PM
  #22  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (47)
 
rpturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: A-Town, Ill side
Posts: 2,363
Received 195 Likes on 162 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by busha61067
at idle the tune it is going to about 12.3 - 12.8 lean
? You know that is not lean, but rich at idle, right? Should be ~14.7 or so, I like mine a little leaner on idle.
Old 11-24-2016, 04:59 PM
  #23  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
busha61067's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: bristol,Tn
Posts: 295
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

yes i know...lol i was typing in a hurry thanks for letting me know. and yea that's around what i thought it should be
Old 11-25-2016, 03:37 PM
  #24  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
busha61067's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: bristol,Tn
Posts: 295
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

bump..
Old 11-26-2016, 10:24 PM
  #25  
Moderator
 
mrvedit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 7,043
Received 385 Likes on 294 Posts

Default

Why do you think you are running lean?
Looking at your tune, your PE table is set to 1.125 across the board which gives you a AFR around 13.1. Many people are getting more power at 1.16 or 1.17.

Your Spark Table seems a bit modest with only 20* below 5200 RPM.

Your VE table isn't as smooth as I would like, but seems OK.

Nothing really jumps out at me.
Again, why do you think you are running lean?
Old 11-26-2016, 10:31 PM
  #26  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
busha61067's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: bristol,Tn
Posts: 295
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

that is my adjusted table. its no longer lean just seems lazy. whats tbe best method of adding timing back in without a dynograph.
Old 11-27-2016, 11:16 AM
  #27  
Moderator
 
mrvedit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 7,043
Received 385 Likes on 294 Posts

Default

It would help if you posted a log file - include both the .hpl and .cfg files.
Besides the typical RPM, TPS, MAP, MAF, Advance and Knock, also include Cylinder Airmass.
"Torque Delivered" is also interesting, but closely related to Cylinder Airmass.
The Airmass tell us what row in the Advance tables are relevant and also a general idea of how much power you are making.
Finally, if you can include the Wideband in the log, that would be great too.

I have ideas of how to tune for timing without a dyno, but to be safe I would rather have the experts here give suggestions and methods. IMHO, 24* from 2400 RPM and up should be safe and still conservative. You definitely want to log any Knock as that indicates you have too much advance for your setup.

Finally I would suggest increasing the PE table to 1.16 or 1.17. It takes a dyno to optimize it at different RPMs, but those values are a good starting point.

Again, I'm not an expert at this and I hope others confirm or correct me.


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Help with adding fuel at WOT



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:52 PM.