Fast, BS3 vs LTFTs
11-01-2004, 05:00 AM
#1
Restricted User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sierra Vista, AZ
Posts: 7,603
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Fast, BS3 vs LTFTs I was reading on the FAST System in GMHTP where it states that FAST doesnt have separate timng table for base idle, PT and WOT, but uses one table. Is BS3 like this as well? And whats the Pros and Cons of this setup in that aspect?
I am thinking it would easier to pop in a timing table as you would only have one table. Drawback is unless you would have to plot the area of that one table, g/sec vs. rpm, for ideal PT timing and etc so it could be more of a hassle.
I like the way the FAST has its playback ability, so you can watch the highlit circle go over the areas you need to adjust, I understand HPT uses something similar with its log archive???
Anyway, I wanted to know if BS3 uses just the one table, and if there are any real drawbacks to that way of tuning. Thanks.
Charlie
I am thinking it would easier to pop in a timing table as you would only have one table. Drawback is unless you would have to plot the area of that one table, g/sec vs. rpm, for ideal PT timing and etc so it could be more of a hassle.
I like the way the FAST has its playback ability, so you can watch the highlit circle go over the areas you need to adjust, I understand HPT uses something similar with its log archive???
Anyway, I wanted to know if BS3 uses just the one table, and if there are any real drawbacks to that way of tuning. Thanks.
Charlie
