FTC cell boundaries in late model Fbodies
#1
On The Tree
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Albuquerque
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
FTC cell boundaries in late model Fbodies
Does anyone know why the FTC boundaries in an 02 Fbody are funky?
(RPM cell boundaries are 2500, 6502, 6503)!!
Why! Why! Why!
Thanks!
Brad
(RPM cell boundaries are 2500, 6502, 6503)!!
Why! Why! Why!
Thanks!
Brad
#2
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (36)
There are a few threads about this.
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthrea...tft+boundaries
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthrea...tft+boundaries
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthrea...tft+boundaries
There are just a few I found real fast.
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthrea...tft+boundaries
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthrea...tft+boundaries
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthrea...tft+boundaries
There are just a few I found real fast.
#3
On The Tree
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Albuquerque
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by HC02SS
There are a few threads about this.
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthrea...tft+boundaries
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthrea...tft+boundaries
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthrea...tft+boundaries
There are just a few I found real fast.
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthrea...tft+boundaries
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthrea...tft+boundaries
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthrea...tft+boundaries
There are just a few I found real fast.
It still begs the question: What possessed GM to change the FCT boundaries in 2000? The stock 1999 FTCs have RPM boundaries of 900, 1400, 2200. In 2000, the FTC boundaries changed as well as the general shape of the VE table.
#4
FormerVendor
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Waldorf, MD
Posts: 3,059
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I read somewhere yesterday GM did it to make sure fueling was maximize for those cells by grouping the largest portions of the ve table together. this supposedly decreased the chance of hittnig an extremely lean cell and detonating. More for safety than anything else.
I think the user was wait4me and he posted on the HPTuners website
I think the user was wait4me and he posted on the HPTuners website
#5
Originally Posted by HumpinSS
I read somewhere yesterday GM did it to make sure fueling was maximize for those cells by grouping the largest portions of the ve table together. this supposedly decreased the chance of hittnig an extremely lean cell and detonating. More for safety than anything else.
I think the user was wait4me and he posted on the HPTuners website
I think the user was wait4me and he posted on the HPTuners website
#6
On The Tree
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Albuquerque
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Another_User
In reality, those later values may be bad (my opinion, for what it's worth). If you are programming your VE table and mess up, your trims may have to move really far and could cause it to go lean. The earlier values (which they kept on the Z06) are more useful.
#7
Originally Posted by S2002S
Thanks! I assume the RPM boundaries are 900, 1400, 2200.