PCM Diagnostics & Tuning HP Tuners | Holley | Diablo
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

*** Update 90mm TB + 48% Effective table

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-11-2005, 12:30 PM
  #1  
7 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
Phil99vette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Port Tobacco, MD
Posts: 8,758
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default *** Update 90mm TB + 48% Effective table

Its been almost 2 weeks now since I changed the effective table by 48% I derived from some calculations and the idle hits and sticks like a carb car. Idle on my 232/238 110 110 is simply amazing.
Phil
Old 06-11-2005, 01:31 PM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Tech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 1,042
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Desired IAC Steps vs. Desired Idle Effective Area (aka IAC Position vs. Effective Area)? Is yours an A4?
Old 06-11-2005, 02:49 PM
  #3  
7 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
Phil99vette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Port Tobacco, MD
Posts: 8,758
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Yes IAC Steps vs Effective area. I am a 6 speed but don't see why transmission would matter.
Phil
Old 06-11-2005, 03:10 PM
  #4  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Tech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 1,042
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Idle is a much more difficult animal on big cam'd autos. M6s don't idle in gear (generally).

I haven't touched that table. Why do you think it made a difference? What is the 'effective area' that it's showing.
Old 06-11-2005, 05:03 PM
  #5  
TECH Addict
 
Bink's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,258
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

From jfpilla's " Idle Thread"
For 90 mm TB move the Effective Area table values 6 places towards the
higher values and leave the IAP values stock.
Thread -> http://www.efilive.com/forum/viewtop...t=1169&start=0
Old 06-11-2005, 06:40 PM
  #6  
Teching In
iTrader: (5)
 
mcneil141's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Oak Ridge, NC
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

OK,

Let me make sure I got this....

I need to multiply my Effective area table x .48 because the area of the TB is greater?

If this works, I'll kiss you guys. Well... maybe not.

TIA,
Andy
Old 06-11-2005, 07:28 PM
  #7  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
P Mack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

How did you calculate 48% again?
Old 06-12-2005, 01:53 AM
  #8  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Dixit's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Canton GA
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Phil does this matter if you have a Nick Williams 90mm TB or a LG G2 90mm TB?
Sorry if a bunch of us are really slow on this, but you definetely are shining light on a good topic.

So this table is showing the the IAC Steps, and you are multiplying the entire table by 48%. That means your highest value is 149 (on a c5 vette) What is the top numbers reference to, where it goes from 0 to 120. I know the table is Desired Idle Effective Area, but what doe that mean? How much the blade is opening? Im lost on this part as well as probably others are. Dont hate me

Dixit
Old 06-12-2005, 02:44 AM
  #9  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
02sierraz71_5.3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Cornelius, NC
Posts: 3,473
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by P Mack
How did you calculate 48% again?

100*.48=48 thats a reduction of 52 percent
multiply by .52 for 48 percent reduction
Old 06-12-2005, 03:38 AM
  #10  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Tech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 1,042
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I have read several places that the IAC wants to be in 30-40 counts. 65 seems a bit high. I'll play with the table on a G5X3 car to see what happens and report back.
Old 06-12-2005, 09:14 AM
  #11  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
P Mack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 02sierraz71_5.3
100*.48=48 thats a reduction of 52 percent
multiply by .52 for 48 percent reduction
That's not what i'm asking. What I want to know is how changing from a 78mm throttlebody to 90mm corresponds to a 48% reduction.
Old 06-12-2005, 09:51 AM
  #12  
7 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
Phil99vette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Port Tobacco, MD
Posts: 8,758
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

I made a spreadsheet that calculated airflow for the 75mm Throttle Body and 90 Throttle Body. 48% is not related to airflow, it is the percentage of step that the 90mm uses to mimic the 75mm Area. So.....

Hypothetically
IF a 75mm TB @ 40 steps has 1 cu/inch of area
Than
a 90mm TB would need 19.2 steps to have the same 1 cubic inch of area

So you need to....
Multiply the 40 steps by .48 to get 19.2
40 x .48 = 19.2

There is alot more to the calculation but this is the jist. Rather than using steps since the step is going to be linear and equally sized, I used 0 to 90degrees and calculated area based on .25 degree. Calculated area when open - area closed to find total area gained, divided that by my 360 steps(360 - 1/4 or .25 degree increments) to find total area for each 1/4 degree of throttle movement. I used that to make a chart to map area of the 75mm TB as the butterfly opens from 0 to 90 degrees or WOT. I made another chart based on the area as it gained and reversed solved the 90mm TB to find the required step to mimic the exact area that the 75 shows. The steps were 48% less in each calculation. So reguardless of what unit that the ECU uses this calculates the same thing.


__________________________________________________ _____
Actual Data**
Stock **
The effective area table is confusing. If you look at it, the ECU says I need 128 area units I need to open the TB up to 17 steps.

Move 6 step right method **
By moving the table 6 places to the right as suggested with a larger TB it now says...
If I need 40 area units I now need to open the TB up 80 steps.

My Calculated Method***
If I need 40 area units I need to open up the TB 61 steps
Old 06-12-2005, 09:10 PM
  #13  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Ragtop 99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bethesda, MD
Posts: 9,491
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Does this table exist in EDIT or just through HPT?
Old 06-12-2005, 09:33 PM
  #14  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (17)
 
ZL1Killa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NC - Charlotte area
Posts: 3,747
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

its in efi live also....i just sent him an email from my car...an 01 trans am because i was wondering if i need to change my table. My car is controlled by cable...not the computer...so i was wondering if i even needed to do this.


OKAY.

This is a father and son build and my dad knows far more than me in this case with this stuff. We do need to change my table and i will see how things run after i do what Phillip has said to do..and let yall know. My dad says he is going to sit down and work up a formula because he wants to play around with it now, lol. Anyways, thanks for the info on this Phillip, I know a lot of people are going to be looking at this..Nick W. has more and more TB's that he has to make day after day.

Last edited by ZL1Killa; 06-12-2005 at 09:49 PM.
Old 06-12-2005, 10:25 PM
  #15  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (10)
 
GrannySShifting's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Glen Burnie, Md
Posts: 3,944
Received 20 Likes on 13 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Ragtop 99
Does this table exist in EDIT or just through HPT?
Joel are you still having issues whith your setup? If so let me know and I cna posibly help you with some of it
Old 06-13-2005, 08:33 AM
  #16  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Ragtop 99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bethesda, MD
Posts: 9,491
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Jeff:

Your PMs are full. I tried sending an e-mail.

Joel
Old 06-13-2005, 11:23 AM
  #17  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
ArKay99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Washington Township, NJ
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Phil, we just used your calc on my friends C5 w/ AFR 205's 224/228 XER, Fast LSX90, & LS2 TB. We also added 2 degrees of timing at idle in the corresponding base spark tables, and the car idles like stock. We were idling at 850rpm's and took it down to 775rpm. Still like stock. Thank for the good work
Old 06-13-2005, 11:35 AM
  #18  
7 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
Phil99vette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Port Tobacco, MD
Posts: 8,758
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

So it does work. My car idles like a kitten with a 232/238 XER 110 straight up.
Old 06-13-2005, 11:41 PM
  #19  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (11)
 
405HP_Z06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Arlington, Tx
Posts: 2,215
Received 18 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Phil99vette
I made a spreadsheet that calculated airflow for the 75mm Throttle Body and 90 Throttle Body. 48% is not related to airflow, it is the percentage of step that the 90mm uses to mimic the 75mm Area. So.....

Hypothetically
IF a 75mm TB @ 40 steps has 1 cu/inch of area
Than
a 90mm TB would need 19.2 steps to have the same 1 cubic inch of area

So you need to....
Multiply the 40 steps by .48 to get 19.2
40 x .48 = 19.2

There is alot more to the calculation but this is the jist. Rather than using steps since the step is going to be linear and equally sized, I used 0 to 90degrees and calculated area based on .25 degree. Calculated area when open - area closed to find total area gained, divided that by my 360 steps(360 - 1/4 or .25 degree increments) to find total area for each 1/4 degree of throttle movement. I used that to make a chart to map area of the 75mm TB as the butterfly opens from 0 to 90 degrees or WOT. I made another chart based on the area as it gained and reversed solved the 90mm TB to find the required step to mimic the exact area that the 75 shows. The steps were 48% less in each calculation. So reguardless of what unit that the ECU uses this calculates the same thing.


__________________________________________________ _____
Actual Data**
Stock **
The effective area table is confusing. If you look at it, the ECU says I need 128 area units I need to open the TB up to 17 steps.

Move 6 step right method **
By moving the table 6 places to the right as suggested with a larger TB it now says...
If I need 40 area units I now need to open the TB up 80 steps.

My Calculated Method***
If I need 40 area units I need to open up the TB 61 steps
Phil,
I'm confused......Did you multiply your whole table by 48% or did you move the whole table to the right a number of cells but not the 6 stated by someone else?
Old 06-14-2005, 08:43 AM
  #20  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (33)
 
WS6FirebirdTA00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 8,318
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

you have to watch it though, that could help on a hot idle (not saying it wont work anywhere else or that its a bad idea, i think its great) but if you scale it and your tb doesnt have the same flow, or similar to stock (like mine with a ported and epoxied tb) then you will need to rebuild the whole table, not just scale it. i rebuilt mine and it has no stalling, sputtering, cutting otu problems...althoguh im still working on some ve and raf numbers. my MAX area is now set to 62 i believe. anything above that is flat because the small copper tube in the tb. phil was having troubles with my process so i dont know if its a 90mm tb problem or if its a vette tb problem, but ive got a cable tb.

either way its done, this wil really help out the car it idle and cruising, it will help to prevent some surging and hanging up in the rpms, or dipping too low when comming to a stop. glad to hear this worked out for you phil


Quick Reply: *** Update 90mm TB + 48% Effective table



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:39 AM.