RAF spreadsheet ver 1.2 (bugfix update)
10-15-2005, 06:34 PM
#1
RAF spreadsheet ver 1.2 (bugfix update) For all the people that have used my spreadsheet, I found a critical typo in there, please go to http://redhardsupra.blogspot.com/ to get a set of spreadsheets for it.
Please report if you find any more problems.
Thanks,
Marcin
Please report if you find any more problems.
Thanks,
Marcin
10-16-2005, 02:14 AM
#6
Restricted User
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sierra Vista, AZ
Posts: 7,603
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Marcin, on the blogspot, under injectors I seen you had used 34.6 for both SVO 30's and 42's, I am sure thats a minor typo. I had read and re-read the whole blog again, and very informative. Thanks for taking the time to help out the community like this.
Charlie
Charlie
Trending Topics
10-25-2005, 10:26 PM
#8
excel is picky how you copy non-contiguous ares, so here's a simple solution:
in your 'display table' in hpt, set up the 4 things you need to later become columns right next to each other, making it easy to highlight, and make excel not complain. also makes it easy to paste into my spreadsheet.
try it, if it doesn't work, we'll take a look at it some more. i've been just really busy lately, so i haven't had much time to reply to emails in depth that i'd like.
in your 'display table' in hpt, set up the 4 things you need to later become columns right next to each other, making it easy to highlight, and make excel not complain. also makes it easy to paste into my spreadsheet.
try it, if it doesn't work, we'll take a look at it some more. i've been just really busy lately, so i haven't had much time to reply to emails in depth that i'd like.
10-25-2005, 11:02 PM
#10
correct, but my car is currently down, and besides that i'm so busy i don't have the time to experiement, while at the same time i can already work with tools that i know works and are easy enough to use.
yes, there is a plan for 'here's my old tools as new maps' in the future, prolly closer to xmas though
yes, there is a plan for 'here's my old tools as new maps' in the future, prolly closer to xmas though
10-25-2005, 11:52 PM
#11
Restricted User
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sierra Vista, AZ
Posts: 7,603
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Black02SS
You guys with HPT 2.0, why not make a cal pid and use the histograms?? That is the point of them isn't it?
Ok, I have no idea WTF your talking about.
10-26-2005, 09:19 AM
#14
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Canton GA
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Marcin, was looking at your speadsheet and seems like you are doing the calculations for the temps incorrectly. What I mean is that you are counting all values say between 133F to 153F as all in the 133F column. I dont believe it works like this. For example you have 111F 133F 154F. Now when you get a reading at 120F the value is being read from your 111F RAF value. At 123F its not actually reading from your 133F value. You can see this even if you were looking at it via the histogram.
So your where your doing the sum of all values on your table that are greater and equal to 133F and less than 154F for all values under the 133F column is slightly incorrect. You should be doing more like 123 through 143 for all values under 133F.
This is the way I understood it worked, if Im horribly wrong, put me in my place.
Dixit
So your where your doing the sum of all values on your table that are greater and equal to 133F and less than 154F for all values under the 133F column is slightly incorrect. You should be doing more like 123 through 143 for all values under 133F.
This is the way I understood it worked, if Im horribly wrong, put me in my place.
Dixit
10-26-2005, 09:56 AM
#15
FormerVendor
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Waldorf, MD
Posts: 3,059
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
He should be counting the middle. Eg
400 800 1200 1600 2000
should be counted 0-600 601-1000 1001-1400 1401-1800 1801-2200
If he isnt doing it this way then yes his spreadsheet is wrong.
400 800 1200 1600 2000
should be counted 0-600 601-1000 1001-1400 1401-1800 1801-2200
If he isnt doing it this way then yes his spreadsheet is wrong.
10-26-2005, 10:20 AM
#16
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Canton GA
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yea thats what I was saying, according to the formula he is doing >= 133 to <154 for example. I think it needs to be >=123 to <= 143 for the 133F calculations and so one for the rest of the ECT values.
Dixit
Dixit
10-26-2005, 10:29 AM
#19
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Canton GA
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well to be fair I was testing it for awhile and never noticed it because didnt really take a look at your calculations. I noticed it today cause I pasted in a block of data that has temps to 150 and noticed that it only had calcuations to 133F.
I stopped using your spreadhsheet awhile back because I just could not get this flipping car to get the RAF table right and just this morning found out with a cam like mine, I think its highly recommended that everyone turns the spark idle control button ON (for HPT 2.0) that way the spark over and underspeed is not fluctuating like crazy and causing the STIT to also fluctuate and never give me consistent reading.
Dixit
I stopped using your spreadhsheet awhile back because I just could not get this flipping car to get the RAF table right and just this morning found out with a cam like mine, I think its highly recommended that everyone turns the spark idle control button ON (for HPT 2.0) that way the spark over and underspeed is not fluctuating like crazy and causing the STIT to also fluctuate and never give me consistent reading.
Dixit
10-26-2005, 10:33 AM
#20
you know, there's a reason why i don't lock or hide formulas in the spreadsheets, you can change it/fix it yourself, if you think you know better. afterall this just needs a -20C shift everywhere, it's pretty trivial.
let me go get my cheerios damn it, not read ls1tech, and i'll fix it...
let me go get my cheerios damn it, not read ls1tech, and i'll fix it...