PCM Diagnostics & Tuning HP Tuners | Holley | Diablo
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Advice please: Just want to hear what everyone thinks is the best A/F margin.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-02-2005, 02:42 AM
  #1  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
 
1 BLOWN V8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Hemet, California
Posts: 1,165
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default Advice please: Just want to hear what everyone thinks is the best A/F margin.

Hey all:

I just want a little input on what everyone would say is a safe A/F margin on a LS1.

I have a 2002 Camaro woth a A4 3,200 stall with all the bolt-ons and heads and cam and had my car tuned and the A/F is 14.0-13.9 all the way across the chart to 6,200 rpm. The tuner says this is perfect.

Also not I am in California with 91 oct gas.

Thanks

Last edited by 1 BLOWN V8; 12-12-2005 at 05:53 AM.
Old 12-02-2005, 02:43 AM
  #2  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Bombguy99z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: San Diego
Posts: 618
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Who is your tuner? Jeff Creech?
Old 12-02-2005, 06:37 AM
  #3  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (11)
 
Billiumss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Erie, PA
Posts: 2,975
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

Um no............ Time to get a new tuner.

A safe A/F is about 12.7-13.2 across the rpm range for an average modded N/A LS1.
Old 12-02-2005, 11:27 AM
  #4  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (30)
 
12secSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,690
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Yup, I agree with Ben and Billiumss. I have my 2001 Camaro SS tuned from 13.00 to 12.84 transitioning from 3000 to 6200 rpms. And this is with 91 Octane.
Old 12-02-2005, 11:41 AM
  #5  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (1)
 
HumpinSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Waldorf, MD
Posts: 3,059
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

12.8 to 13.2 if you tuners says this is perfect ask for a refund that is too lean and is prolly on the lean side of not making an more power. You will prolly pick up a few by richening it up a little
Old 12-02-2005, 11:58 AM
  #6  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (16)
 
soundengineer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Chicago IL
Posts: 4,651
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

start low at 12.5...up to peak torque... lean upi to 12.8 by the time you hit peak HP...richen back up to 12.5 by the rev limiter..

thats what I do..has worked great for me
Old 12-02-2005, 12:08 PM
  #7  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (10)
 
wait4me's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: warsaw, in
Posts: 2,961
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Is this the same tuner that put the flat 45 degrees of timing accross the board in the previous blow up post.? lol
Old 12-02-2005, 01:47 PM
  #8  
Teching In
 
rooster433's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bombguy99z28
Who is your tuner? Jeff Creech?

Thats what he likes to do.

straight off his website
http://www.carolinaautomasters.com/dynographs/

Too lean for me, but hey thats not for me to say.
Old 12-02-2005, 04:54 PM
  #9  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Bombguy99z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: San Diego
Posts: 618
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I dunno... I have friends that use his tunes and like it. I doubt he can run much timing with that lean of a tune. Generally speaking if you have to choose between timing and leaner a/f mix, you want to lean towards the timing side of it, thats where the power is at.

I have never actually looked at a Jeff Creech tune so I wouldn't know what exactly he is doing or why he is doing it.

My personal preferences are in line with soundengineers.
Old 12-02-2005, 05:03 PM
  #10  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Bombguy99z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: San Diego
Posts: 618
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I briefly glanced at some of his dyno graphs and it looks like in most cases he keeps it in the low 13s, in the 13.0-13.3 range. If a wideband is showing your car to be 14.0 ish I'd find another tuner. Keep in mind a wideband in the tailpipe and a wideband closer to the header will read a bit different, but not an integers difference, maybe a few tenths.
Old 12-02-2005, 05:23 PM
  #11  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (1)
 
HumpinSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Waldorf, MD
Posts: 3,059
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

personally i think more power is picked up with leaner mixtures and less timing. Its all about the sweet spot for the AFR combo with timing (peak cylinder pressure). 1-2* of timing wont net you a much of a gain as .5-1.0 point in AFR to a certain extent and not exceeding 13.5:1
Old 12-02-2005, 06:03 PM
  #12  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
 
1 BLOWN V8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Hemet, California
Posts: 1,165
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I also meant to state what my timing is set at. He set it at 25.5 WOT
Old 12-02-2005, 09:07 PM
  #13  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Bombguy99z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: San Diego
Posts: 618
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Do you have any dyno time to back that theory up? I've seen on a steady state (brake) dyno the exact opposite. Watched a guy hold the engine at a certain MAP/RPM and add/remove fuel with no real difference in applied power, yet add/remove timing to a vast difference in power.

Originally Posted by HumpinSS
personally i think more power is picked up with leaner mixtures and less timing. Its all about the sweet spot for the AFR combo with timing (peak cylinder pressure). 1-2* of timing wont net you a much of a gain as .5-1.0 point in AFR to a certain extent and not exceeding 13.5:1
Old 12-02-2005, 09:22 PM
  #14  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (1)
 
HumpinSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Waldorf, MD
Posts: 3,059
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have a tad bit of dyno time with my setup that backs that theory up but if that is what you saw with your own two eyes I cant argue that... That is why I prefaced my post with "personally i think"
Old 12-03-2005, 01:31 AM
  #15  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Bombguy99z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: San Diego
Posts: 618
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Cool. I was just curious. Most guys when they 'dyno' a car they refer to a WOT dyno run, not actually holding it in a certain cell and tuning that cell.

Pretty much every engine combo is going to be slightly different as far as air/fuel and timing, so its within the realm of possibilities that some engines will make more power with leaner air/fuel and less timing. Pretty much everything I've ever heard/seen points to timing being much more important than AFR though.
Old 12-03-2005, 01:38 AM
  #16  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (16)
 
soundengineer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Chicago IL
Posts: 4,651
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Timing is extremely important...
you are trying to detonate the fuel at just the right spot so that you get maximum torque generated from the explosion pushing the piston down in its cylinder...
you can dump more or less fuel in...but without the right spark you dont get much diference

In a general blanket statement..I have seen the best power on Ls1's hover around 27* and around 12.8:1 A/F... but every car is different, some cars need less ro more fuel, and some need less or more timing... there is no exact perfect way to do every car.
Old 12-03-2005, 03:47 AM
  #17  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (42)
 
Tireburnin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,005
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

You sure your not thinking 12.9 to 13.0? I got tuned the same day you did and was in the shop when yours was tuned...

Mine is at 13.1 - 13.3 flat across.

Maybe yours was off, but I didn't see a single car leave the dyno with that kind of AFR. Was it like that on all runs? Was this on a re dyno? Have an exhaust leak?
Old 12-03-2005, 04:49 AM
  #18  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (1)
 
HumpinSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Waldorf, MD
Posts: 3,059
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

McRat and J-Rod IIRC have posted back to back dyno pulls where 22* or 24* of timing made no more power than 26-28* of timing on a ZO6. On my car there was a 5 horse difference fooling around with timing and I gained more with getting the AFR where i wanted it rather than playing with the timing of the engine. In my case I got more power that way and in your case (and I am not arguing just providing my facts) you seen more with timing.
Old 12-03-2005, 06:48 AM
  #19  
TECH Fanatic
 
SideStep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,942
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I think what we are seeing here is that different part combinations want different timing/AFR combinations. I cannot see how any ONE answer can fit all the possible hardware combos. LG headers like to run lean (other LG owners have commented the same) and I have noticed that the more overlap my cam has the more timing my combination wants. I have over 82 dyno runs and countless deserted road runs. I have never made more power then with 26-27 degrees timing and 13.6 AFR (at the higher RPMs), with my current parts list. I could easily see a more stock engine/car needing less AFR and allowing less timing.


Last edited by SideStep; 12-03-2005 at 07:00 AM.
Old 12-03-2005, 01:30 PM
  #20  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Bombguy99z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: San Diego
Posts: 618
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Considering most of our cars came from the factory commanding around 11.5:1 afr, yes, you can pick decent power up.

Timing is reallly combo dependant. Stock LS6 heads/ LS6 cam, yes, maybe 22-24 is fine. However, any changes to the heads and camshaft will change that timing that will work. Change the static compression, dynamic compression, chamber, airflow, all these things will change what kind of timing your engine will optimally run at.

Air fuel ratio, once you get it dialed into the 12.7 - 13.0 range, doesn't matter. When tuning a car, you can pretty much be safely assured that once you have it running in that range, you won't pick-up or lose much power changing it.

Timing, on the other hand, is much more critical to attaining the maximum power your setup can provide.

I agree that in some setups, leaner or richer air/fuel mix than what I've listed is optimal, but in most cases this information will hold true.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:11 AM.