LTFT's are tuned, now what?
#1
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
VE's are tuned, now what?
I'm obviously a n00b at this.
I got my VE's tuned finally (+/- 3). That stickied write up needs to be edited for 98 tuning, but anyways. According to the same stickied tuning process it states that I should now tune my PE table. The question I have may be a dumb one. Now that I'm done with my LTFT's, do I plug the MAF back in and set the fail frequency back to stock before proceeding on?
After PE tuning, where do I go? Timing? MAF? I've already got the trans tuned.
Any help would be appreciated. Thanks.
I got my VE's tuned finally (+/- 3). That stickied write up needs to be edited for 98 tuning, but anyways. According to the same stickied tuning process it states that I should now tune my PE table. The question I have may be a dumb one. Now that I'm done with my LTFT's, do I plug the MAF back in and set the fail frequency back to stock before proceeding on?
After PE tuning, where do I go? Timing? MAF? I've already got the trans tuned.
Any help would be appreciated. Thanks.
Last edited by firechicken_98; 04-04-2006 at 09:13 PM.
#2
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (23)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Watertown, NY
Posts: 8,797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am assuming you mean you got the VE table dialed in, so now plug the MAF in and set the fail freq back to stock and do more driving/logging and watch LTFT's again. After enough logging you will have to adjust the MAF table to get your trims dialed in again with the MAF in system. Once you get the MAF table dialed in with good LTFT's then go ahead and do your WOT/PE tune. You will want a wideband 02 sensor for the pe tune.
#4
Originally Posted by firechicken_98
Yeah, VE's are what I meant.
So I plug the MAF back in, set the fail freq. to stock, and log some more. Will I also have to adjust my VE's again or just the MAF?
So I plug the MAF back in, set the fail freq. to stock, and log some more. Will I also have to adjust my VE's again or just the MAF?
#6
Launching!
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ringgold, GA
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
firechicken_98, not to get off topic but... Wondering what you saw in the stickies that you would change for the 98. I'm working with the same model and just wondered what you might have come across that maybe I overlooked.
#7
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well, I followed the stickied write-up trying to tune my VE's. I adjusted it exactly like it stated and was getting nowhere. I spent all day doing this. It was like going in circles. I would log, make changes, and log some more. Nothing was getting better. I finally said to h#ll with it and went back to the stock VE.
Later that night I did some research and found out that on 98's and early 99's you need to also adjust the secondary VE table as well as the primary; otherwise, you will get nowhere. You just basically copy and past the row from the primary to the corresponding row on the secondary(the primary rows are in mulitples of 5 and the secondary is in multiple of 10, you go 10-10, 20-20, etc...). Don't do this until after you correct the primary.
I also found a better way to adjust the VE table. Instead of taking the VE table and +/- for the LTFT in the log you use this equation, which came from the HP tuners website in the help section (LTFT + STFT)/2 = VE table adjustment.
I did those 2 things and on my first attempt I got my LTFT's +/- 5. I then did the smoothing trick from the write-up and my LTFT's went to +/- 3.
I hope this will save you some time.
Later that night I did some research and found out that on 98's and early 99's you need to also adjust the secondary VE table as well as the primary; otherwise, you will get nowhere. You just basically copy and past the row from the primary to the corresponding row on the secondary(the primary rows are in mulitples of 5 and the secondary is in multiple of 10, you go 10-10, 20-20, etc...). Don't do this until after you correct the primary.
I also found a better way to adjust the VE table. Instead of taking the VE table and +/- for the LTFT in the log you use this equation, which came from the HP tuners website in the help section (LTFT + STFT)/2 = VE table adjustment.
I did those 2 things and on my first attempt I got my LTFT's +/- 5. I then did the smoothing trick from the write-up and my LTFT's went to +/- 3.
I hope this will save you some time.
Trending Topics
#9
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm sure it may be in one of them, but not the one I used. Which one were you looking at?
I'm not trying to knock, bash, or flame the write-ups by any means. I hope nobody thinks that. There's a lot of great info in there and I've learned a lot from them. I'm just conveying my experience from the one I read. It was actually a good learning experience.
I'm not trying to knock, bash, or flame the write-ups by any means. I hope nobody thinks that. There's a lot of great info in there and I've learned a lot from them. I'm just conveying my experience from the one I read. It was actually a good learning experience.
#10
Launching!
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ringgold, GA
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
firechicken, thanks for the response. I assumed the secondary table was what you were talking about but thought it worth asking. I see it mentioned in some write ups but not others. I've seen a lot of guys ask the question "why aren't my LTFTs changing after I update my VE table" knowing they probably have a secondary table.
Now that you've got your VE close you can work the MAF over and get things dialed in good. There's a recent post on HPT forum that details setting up a histogram that will match the MAF frequency to the associated LTFT cell. I set it up and it gave me another point of reference to dial in the MAF besides the standard MAFTune (#8).
Now that you've got your VE close you can work the MAF over and get things dialed in good. There's a recent post on HPT forum that details setting up a histogram that will match the MAF frequency to the associated LTFT cell. I set it up and it gave me another point of reference to dial in the MAF besides the standard MAFTune (#8).
#12
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Anyone have a good write-up on how to dial in your MAF? Or can someone tell me how to do it?
Most of the ones I've found are very technical and complicated and doesn't really tell you how to adjust it. I'm not an engineer or a scientist, so maybe one that's simplified.
Most of the ones I've found are very technical and complicated and doesn't really tell you how to adjust it. I'm not an engineer or a scientist, so maybe one that's simplified.
#13
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (23)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Watertown, NY
Posts: 8,797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by firechicken_98
Anyone have a good write-up on how to dial in your MAF? Or can someone tell me how to do it?
Most of the ones I've found are very technical and complicated and doesn't really tell you how to adjust it. I'm not an engineer or a scientist, so maybe one that's simplified.
Most of the ones I've found are very technical and complicated and doesn't really tell you how to adjust it. I'm not an engineer or a scientist, so maybe one that's simplified.
#15
Launching!
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ringgold, GA
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Firechicken, search the posts on HPT forum. Reference my earlier post, there's a description (and screen shot) of how to set up a new histogram. With this set up it's just like tuning your VE using LTFT/STFTs. It logs the LTFTs in the individual frequency ranges so you can accurately adjust each cell on your MAF table. I would also check #8 histogram to make sure your new numbers are close to what it's logging. Mine were about 3/4% higher than the #8 logged.
#18
TECH Fanatic
Originally Posted by crewchef