Pinging - tune problem?
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Pinging - tune problem?
I have a 99 T/A with basic mods (flowmaster, K&N cold air, mild tune - egr/air off, fan speeds, a little touch here and there).
Now that the cool weather has arrived I have a horrible ping under heavy throttle. Sounds pretty bad. I first suspected that I had a bad tank of fuel so I waited out on the tank and re-filled with good premium and it is still pinging. The car has been well maintained. Recent plugs (NGK TR55), injection cleaning, fuel filter.
Fuel pressure at the rail is 52psi with ignition on and 62psi running. I unplugged the MAF and the pinging has been reduced a little bit, but not much. Any ideas?
Now that the cool weather has arrived I have a horrible ping under heavy throttle. Sounds pretty bad. I first suspected that I had a bad tank of fuel so I waited out on the tank and re-filled with good premium and it is still pinging. The car has been well maintained. Recent plugs (NGK TR55), injection cleaning, fuel filter.
Fuel pressure at the rail is 52psi with ignition on and 62psi running. I unplugged the MAF and the pinging has been reduced a little bit, but not much. Any ideas?
Trending Topics
#8
10 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: orlando, fl
Posts: 4,266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i'm the one that did his tuning, using HPTuners. i'm looking at his high octane table right now.
from 2200-8000 rpms in the .52 - 1.20 g/cyl block, it is all set at 26*
EGR correction table zero'ed out.
IAT Table is all set to zeros as well.
ECT Spark table. i removed the negative timing and set to zero, in the -20-85*C and .16-.44 g/cyl
now, i did just see something odd. the low octane table is all screwed up. for some reason, it is in the 45* range. guess i need to get back with you one day and reupload another file. don't know how i missed that.
it's making me wonder why it's going into the low octane table.
i uploaded the file. if any of you guys see anything else, let me know.
from 2200-8000 rpms in the .52 - 1.20 g/cyl block, it is all set at 26*
EGR correction table zero'ed out.
IAT Table is all set to zeros as well.
ECT Spark table. i removed the negative timing and set to zero, in the -20-85*C and .16-.44 g/cyl
now, i did just see something odd. the low octane table is all screwed up. for some reason, it is in the 45* range. guess i need to get back with you one day and reupload another file. don't know how i missed that.
it's making me wonder why it's going into the low octane table.
i uploaded the file. if any of you guys see anything else, let me know.
#9
9 Second Club
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Cabot, AR
Posts: 3,126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Also check the fuel mixture spark table. Also, if it is showing any MAF codes, it will be running SD and therfore using the low octane table instead of the high. I don't know what other codes could contribute to it, but there may be some.
#10
FormerVendor
iTrader: (45)
It's gonna run some interpolation of the two tables, and the knock learn factor has an influence on which it favors. In this case, if the KLF had it favoring the LO table from persistent knock, and that table was actually higher... I usually just copy the HO table over to the LO and subtract 3 to 4 degrees from the whole thing.
#11
10 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: orlando, fl
Posts: 4,266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's gonna run some interpolation of the two tables, and the knock learn factor has an influence on which it favors. In this case, if the KLF had it favoring the LO table from persistent knock, and that table was actually higher... I usually just copy the HO table over to the LO and subtract 3 to 4 degrees from the whole thing.