160 Thermostat Tune??
#1
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
160 Thermostat Tune??
I am getting ready to replace my thermostat to a 160 deg tstat and was wandering what other changes I will need to tune for other than the 'Fan On' temperatures??? Should I install, change the fan temps, then re-tune my VE table, MAF, and spark table? What other things change when it runs cooler?? Thanks in advance!!
Trending Topics
#8
FormerVendor
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Jacksonville, Fl
Posts: 1,573
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I would recommend using the 180 stat instead. IMHO, the 160 stat will yeild reduced gas milage and less than optimal performance results. The best dyno runs and track performance results that I have witnessed have been with the ECT reporting ~190 F. Colder is not always better for combustion with aluminum heads and blocks.
#9
TECH Resident
iTrader: (17)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NC - Charlotte area
Posts: 3,747
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I would recommend using the 180 stat instead. IMHO, the 160 stat will yeild reduced gas milage and less than optimal performance results. The best dyno runs and track performance results that I have witnessed have been with the ECT reporting ~190 F. Colder is not always better for combustion with aluminum heads and blocks.
I do not see a problem with his car not getting to 190... unless he wants his fans on all the time.
#10
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (21)
Well, sort of. I guess it depends on how you look at it. Although the 160 begins to open at 160, it is not fully open until 175, which is what you allude to. And I suggest that no radiator is so efficient that it would remain at 175 and go no higher. And I agree, 190 seems to be a reasonable objective for a "normal" car under "normal" circumstances.
#12
10 Second Club
iTrader: (15)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: St. Michael, MN.
Posts: 4,519
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I would recommend using the 180 stat instead. IMHO, the 160 stat will yeild reduced gas milage and less than optimal performance results. The best dyno runs and track performance results that I have witnessed have been with the ECT reporting ~190 F. Colder is not always better for combustion with aluminum heads and blocks.
#13
TECH Resident
iTrader: (17)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NC - Charlotte area
Posts: 3,747
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
are you speaking of the actual NEGATIVE numbers IN the table, or are you speaking of the negative values of the ECT that is on the side/top depening on the tuning program?