HP and torque question for all you "bird" people
#1
HP and torque question for all you "bird" people
Hey y'all;
I'm over from the LS4 front drives section ('06 Monte SS owner) with a question for all you Trans Am fanatics. Have been a long time T/A lover (have even had one in the past, a '79 four speed) and have always wanted another. Have always told myself I will own a WS6 car ever since they came out and now am in the process of buying one. So here's my question. The stock T/A (non WS6 model in the '98-'02 vintage) boasts HP and torque numbers of 305 and 320 respectively. The WS6 epuiped cars of 320 and 345 respectively. The only difference in the powerplant of the two cars I have ever been able to come across is the functional ram air. So where do the WS6 cars come up with the extra 15 ponies and 25 lbs. of torque? I can't see the ram air making up all of that, so what gives? I never really gave it much thought b4 about the difference and where it came from, just knew it was there. But now in buying one, kinda want to know for my own curiousity. Thanx for any info.
P.S. Thought I would attatch a photo or two of the other reason I am on this site, just to let y'all know that when the T/A I'm looking at is brought home, it won't be lonely.
I'm over from the LS4 front drives section ('06 Monte SS owner) with a question for all you Trans Am fanatics. Have been a long time T/A lover (have even had one in the past, a '79 four speed) and have always wanted another. Have always told myself I will own a WS6 car ever since they came out and now am in the process of buying one. So here's my question. The stock T/A (non WS6 model in the '98-'02 vintage) boasts HP and torque numbers of 305 and 320 respectively. The WS6 epuiped cars of 320 and 345 respectively. The only difference in the powerplant of the two cars I have ever been able to come across is the functional ram air. So where do the WS6 cars come up with the extra 15 ponies and 25 lbs. of torque? I can't see the ram air making up all of that, so what gives? I never really gave it much thought b4 about the difference and where it came from, just knew it was there. But now in buying one, kinda want to know for my own curiousity. Thanx for any info.
P.S. Thought I would attatch a photo or two of the other reason I am on this site, just to let y'all know that when the T/A I'm looking at is brought home, it won't be lonely.
#2
It's not mine! woo hoo!
iTrader: (7)
All LS1 vehicles make approximately 350hp and 360tq at the crank.
97-04 Corvette
98-02 Camaro Z28/SS
98-02 Firebird Trans Am/Formula/WS6
04 GTO
There are obviously some minor variations throughout the years and for packaging reasons, but if you search this site and elsewhere, you will find the facts to back this up. Good luck on your purchase!
97-04 Corvette
98-02 Camaro Z28/SS
98-02 Firebird Trans Am/Formula/WS6
04 GTO
There are obviously some minor variations throughout the years and for packaging reasons, but if you search this site and elsewhere, you will find the facts to back this up. Good luck on your purchase!
#3
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: St. Clair Shores Mi.
Posts: 1,265
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
3 Posts
All LS1 vehicles make approximately 350hp and 360tq at the crank.
97-04 Corvette
98-02 Camaro Z28/SS
98-02 Firebird Trans Am/Formula/WS6
04 GTO
There are obviously some minor variations throughout the years and for packaging reasons, but if you search this site and elsewhere, you will find the facts to back this up. Good luck on your purchase!
97-04 Corvette
98-02 Camaro Z28/SS
98-02 Firebird Trans Am/Formula/WS6
04 GTO
There are obviously some minor variations throughout the years and for packaging reasons, but if you search this site and elsewhere, you will find the facts to back this up. Good luck on your purchase!
The HP difference isn't there it was mainly Marketing Hype.
#5
Hey y'all;
Thanx for the responses so far. Kinda what I was wondering, (much like what you said LS1W66), if the number differences aren't more hype than anything. I mean, I consider myself pretty techy and a motorhead when it comes to this stuff and have been a GM man all my life. Especially when it comes to the sports/muscle car part of things. I was fairly certain that I hadn't missed anything as far as differences in the non WS6 to WS6 cars, but with Pontiac claiming 15HP and 25lbs of torque, makes one wonder. (Thought maybe, POSSIBLY there was some cam timing differences or something like that). But in all the reading I've done, the only difference between WS6 and non is the ram air and the variable spring rates in the suspension.
Now sure, I understand there may be a small increase in HP from the ram air (at higher speeds of course), but the most I've seen in cars and in bikes (kinda a bike person too), is a couple of horse (maybe 3-6 at best). And torque, well to me torque isn't something that benefits from ram air. The twisting force of an engine doesn't really benefit from forced air induction, it is what it is. But the WS6 boasting 15 horse and 25lbs of torque over it's non-snouted brother, I'm thinking Pontiac was trying to make it sound like for $3200 for the WS6 pkg, you were getting more than just looks.
But doesn't really matter. Both cars still run like raped apes!!!!!!
Thanx for the responses so far. Kinda what I was wondering, (much like what you said LS1W66), if the number differences aren't more hype than anything. I mean, I consider myself pretty techy and a motorhead when it comes to this stuff and have been a GM man all my life. Especially when it comes to the sports/muscle car part of things. I was fairly certain that I hadn't missed anything as far as differences in the non WS6 to WS6 cars, but with Pontiac claiming 15HP and 25lbs of torque, makes one wonder. (Thought maybe, POSSIBLY there was some cam timing differences or something like that). But in all the reading I've done, the only difference between WS6 and non is the ram air and the variable spring rates in the suspension.
Now sure, I understand there may be a small increase in HP from the ram air (at higher speeds of course), but the most I've seen in cars and in bikes (kinda a bike person too), is a couple of horse (maybe 3-6 at best). And torque, well to me torque isn't something that benefits from ram air. The twisting force of an engine doesn't really benefit from forced air induction, it is what it is. But the WS6 boasting 15 horse and 25lbs of torque over it's non-snouted brother, I'm thinking Pontiac was trying to make it sound like for $3200 for the WS6 pkg, you were getting more than just looks.
But doesn't really matter. Both cars still run like raped apes!!!!!!
#6
TECH Senior Member
Hey y'all;
Thanx for the responses so far. Kinda what I was wondering, (much like what you said LS1W66), if the number differences aren't more hype than anything. I mean, I consider myself pretty techy and a motorhead when it comes to this stuff and have been a GM man all my life. Especially when it comes to the sports/muscle car part of things. I was fairly certain that I hadn't missed anything as far as differences in the non WS6 to WS6 cars, but with Pontiac claiming 15HP and 25lbs of torque, makes one wonder. (Thought maybe, POSSIBLY there was some cam timing differences or something like that). But in all the reading I've done, the only difference between WS6 and non is the ram air and the variable spring rates in the suspension.
Thanx for the responses so far. Kinda what I was wondering, (much like what you said LS1W66), if the number differences aren't more hype than anything. I mean, I consider myself pretty techy and a motorhead when it comes to this stuff and have been a GM man all my life. Especially when it comes to the sports/muscle car part of things. I was fairly certain that I hadn't missed anything as far as differences in the non WS6 to WS6 cars, but with Pontiac claiming 15HP and 25lbs of torque, makes one wonder. (Thought maybe, POSSIBLY there was some cam timing differences or something like that). But in all the reading I've done, the only difference between WS6 and non is the ram air and the variable spring rates in the suspension.
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showpost....33&postcount=6
Now sure, I understand there may be a small increase in HP from the ram air (at higher speeds of course), but the most I've seen in cars and in bikes (kinda a bike person too), is a couple of horse (maybe 3-6 at best). And torque, well to me torque isn't something that benefits from ram air. The twisting force of an engine doesn't really benefit from forced air induction, it is what it is. But the WS6 boasting 15 horse and 25lbs of torque over it's non-snouted brother, I'm thinking Pontiac was trying to make it sound like for $3200 for the WS6 pkg, you were getting more than just looks.
But doesn't really matter. Both cars still run like raped apes!!!!!!
But doesn't really matter. Both cars still run like raped apes!!!!!!
If the RPMs stay the same, and hp increases, that means torque increased (hp is just a variable of torque, torque[curve] is actually what moves your car).
#7
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
Nobody's mentioned the fact that WS6s have a better flowing exhaust than non-WS6 cars, which accounts for most of the factory rating increase. This is why an aftermarket exhaust systems show bigger gains on non-WS6 cars than the same system does on a WS6, because the factory WS6 exhaust is already better than where the non-WS6 systems start. For the LS1 WS6s, the only variation between years is that the '98 WS6s used a unique, oddball looking SOTL (Single On The Left) system w/ a 3" round tip, while the '99-'02s used a different, quieter muffler and dual 2.5" round tips (non-WS6 V8 birds used oval tips). The change in '99 was to meet new noise standards. The SOTL was probably the best factory exhaust system installed on any V8 LS1 (it was also used on '98 SSs).
WRT the "ram air" hype, yeah it's mostly marketing hype at speeds encountered in a typical 1/4 mi run. BUT above 100MPH real gains w/ the Ram Air intake have been documented as proof there is something to be gained. In the Aug '99 issue C&D tested identically equipped '99 SS and '99 WS6 'verts, both 6Ms and the WS6 hit the speed limiter at 163MPH while the SS with it's less effective, more convoluted CAI system could only muster 160. I'd imagine the top-end benefit over a f-bod w/ no CAI system like a non-WS6 T/A would be even more pronounced.
WRT the "ram air" hype, yeah it's mostly marketing hype at speeds encountered in a typical 1/4 mi run. BUT above 100MPH real gains w/ the Ram Air intake have been documented as proof there is something to be gained. In the Aug '99 issue C&D tested identically equipped '99 SS and '99 WS6 'verts, both 6Ms and the WS6 hit the speed limiter at 163MPH while the SS with it's less effective, more convoluted CAI system could only muster 160. I'd imagine the top-end benefit over a f-bod w/ no CAI system like a non-WS6 T/A would be even more pronounced.
Trending Topics
#11
The difference in the LS1's are year to year...they basically get better and if you get technical they are completely different yet dont yeild too much of a difference power wise usually.
#13
01,02's got the smaller truck cam.....Its a numbers game that so called better flowing muffler that the WS6 came with when I cut it open looked the exact same as the stock muffler on the base T/a...