2012 Camaro - HP and MPG increases!? - LS1TECH

Log In 


2012 Camaro - HP and MPG increases!?

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-05-2012, 05:59 PM   #1
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Indiana
Posts: 957
Default 2012 Camaro - HP and MPG increases!?

I'm seeing ads for the 2012 Camaro V6 model, they are advertising 323HP and 30MPG on the highway.

Now I remember 2010 was 304HP and 29MPG, then 2011 they said the first HP was too conservative and it was actually 312HP and 29MPG. Now this year it goes up by 11HP and 1MPG? Did they do something to the engine? Just wondering.

Also, a second question. Has anyone noticed the new muscle cars coming out, and as the next new one comes out its HP is just slightly higher than its competitor? Example:

2010 Camaro V6: 304HP
2011 Mustang v6: 305HP

2009 Challenger SRT-8: 425HP
2010 Camaro SS: 426HP

Does that marketing technique actually work? Lol, one HP more than the competitor?
WhiteKnight '01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2012, 06:04 PM   #2
11 Second Club
iTrader: (7)
 
AznMuscle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Someplace Hot
Posts: 817
Default

Most people care about numbers, even is its crank. When advertising to folks like most of us here on tech though......we know what we care about. Real dyno power and 1/4 times, and skid pad.
AznMuscle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2012, 06:06 PM   #3
Launching!
 
versz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Ohio
Posts: 211
Default

Its eye candy. In the end the only people that can afford these cars at the moment are just going to go with whichever they like better. The MPG would convince people. The one more horsepower probably won't. At least the v6's are finally getting to be worth driving. There is a member on here who rented a 11' v6 Stang and has videos of him racing it. It actually sounds good. Lot better than the old 4.0 and 3.8s
versz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2012, 06:51 PM   #4
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (17)
 
HoLLo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Italy
Posts: 3,168
Default

A twin turbo V6 camaro would be a cool little ride.
HoLLo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2012, 08:21 PM   #5
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Tainted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 8,431
Default

Even better that the v6 models are (almost) all faster than their previous v8 counterparts lol
Tainted is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2012, 08:28 PM   #6
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
'WHEELS''s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 176
Default

cars these days are getting fast. one of the reasons I got out of the car game was because unless you're dropping loads of cash into your car, you'll be inferior to a V6 camaro soon enough lol. Just can't keep up with it.

now i just get mad because newer Jeeps can tuck 35's/37's with less supporting mods it's all hand in hand i guess.
'WHEELS' is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2012, 08:32 PM   #7
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (13)
 
UltraZLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Hanover, Michigan
Posts: 1,150
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WhiteKnight '01 View Post
I'm seeing ads for the 2012 Camaro V6 model, they are advertising 323HP and 30MPG on the highway.

Now I remember 2010 was 304HP and 29MPG, then 2011 they said the first HP was too conservative and it was actually 312HP and 29MPG. Now this year it goes up by 11HP and 1MPG? Did they do something to the engine? Just wondering.

Also, a second question. Has anyone noticed the new muscle cars coming out, and as the next new one comes out its HP is just slightly higher than its competitor? Example:

2010 Camaro V6: 304HP
2011 Mustang v6: 305HP

2009 Challenger SRT-8: 425HP
2010 Camaro SS: 426HP

Does that marketing technique actually work? Lol, one HP more than the competitor?
2010 to 2011 v6 rating was just an update from re-certification. GM claims that it had not been tested since it was in the Cadillac or something to that tune.

The 2012 v6 actually makes more power. I know it has updated cylinder heads which do away with the need for exhaust manifolds. It is somehow built into the head. Didnt really look into it but thats what I read. Not sure if they made any cam changes or anything else...but the heads are different for sure.
UltraZLS1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2012, 11:34 PM   #8
TECH Regular
 
why87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Piqua,OH
Posts: 429
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by UltraZLS1 View Post
2010 to 2011 v6 rating was just an update from re-certification. GM claims that it had not been tested since it was in the Cadillac or something to that tune.

The 2012 v6 actually makes more power. I know it has updated cylinder heads which do away with the need for exhaust manifolds. It is somehow built into the head. Didnt really look into it but thats what I read. Not sure if they made any cam changes or anything else...but the heads are different for sure.
http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=165836
why87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2012, 12:13 AM   #9
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
Catmaigne's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Conshohocken, PA
Posts: 1,087
Default

Quote:
The new cylinder head with integrated exhaust manifold...

What in the Sam Hill is that?!

That's... different... I guess.
Catmaigne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2012, 12:16 AM   #10
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Tainted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 8,431
Default

Id love to see the representation pics of that head and how that works. Does it all converge in the head itself now? Are there only one exhaust port on each head???
Tainted is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2012, 12:19 AM   #11
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Tainted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 8,431
Default

Shablam!

http://www.torquenews.com/766/new-ch...-cylinder-head
Tainted is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2012, 05:23 PM   #12
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Indiana
Posts: 957
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by why87 View Post
Thank you for that link. The information in there is exactly what I was looking for.

So the new Camaro has an engine that weighs 20 lbs less and some updated engine parts with an additional 11HP. Is this thing getting any quicker yet? Maybe a 13.9 pass in the 1/4 mile? That would keep up with an LT1.
WhiteKnight '01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2012, 12:34 AM   #13
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (15)
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: VA
Posts: 1,754
Default

Doubt they'll break into the 13's, probably .1 difference at most ..quickest stock 2010-11 ran like 14.2 and pretty sure the average times are much worse than that.
Tan327 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2012, 08:47 AM   #14
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
Catmaigne's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Conshohocken, PA
Posts: 1,087
Default

It's hard launching a 4000lb cow down a runway... even if it has 323hp.
Catmaigne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2012, 09:08 PM   #15
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (6)
 
X-ray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Posts: 550
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Catmaigne View Post
It's hard launching a 4000lb cow down a runway... even if it has 323hp.
This post made me wonder...

Quote:
Mature weights of cows depend on the breed. Smaller breeds of cattle such as Dexter and Jersey mature anywhere between 600 and 1000 lbs (or 272 kg to 454 kg). Large Continental breeds such as Charolais, Marchigiana, Belgian Blue and Chianina mature up to 1400 to 2500 lbs (or 635 kg to 1134 kg). British-breed cows such as Hereford, Angus (including Red Angus and Black Angus), and Shorthorn mature between 1000 to 2000 lbs (or 454 kg to 907 kg), occasionally higher particularly with Angus and Hereford.

Bulls will always be a bit larger than cows by a few extra hundred pounds. Chianina bulls can weigh up to 3300 lbs (~1500 kg); British bulls like Angus and Hereford can weigh as little as 2000 lbs (907 kg) to as much as 3000 lbs (1361 kg).
So cows and bulls are lighter than a Camaro.
X-ray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2012, 09:20 PM   #16
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
jmurray87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 1,894
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Catmaigne View Post
It's hard launching a 4000lb cow down a runway... even if it has 323hp.
It's not 4000lbs.
jmurray87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2012, 09:57 PM   #17
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Indiana
Posts: 957
Default

About 3,800 lbs for the V6 model right?
WhiteKnight '01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2012, 10:54 PM   #18
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
jmurray87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 1,894
Default

Thats the weight of an SS, I believe the V6 was around 3600-3700 range.
jmurray87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2012, 11:26 PM   #19
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (90)
 
01ssreda4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Turnin' Wrenches Infractions: 005
Posts: 21,506
Default

So no headers for the V6 guys Eventually there will be no bolt-ons at all.
01ssreda4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2012, 12:21 AM   #20
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
DoggyB22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Bay Area, Califuckinfornia
Posts: 1,620
Default

Yea different manifold
DoggyB22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Edmunds Full-Test - 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee Overland V6 TriShield Automotive News, Media & Press 14 08-13-2010 05:51 PM
2011 Camaro V6 gets 312hp, all models get Synergy Green SEMA2009 Gen 5 Camaro External Bolt-On Tech 3 04-11-2010 10:47 PM
All 2010 Camaro First Drives Here TriShield Automotive News, Media & Press 35 04-10-2009 10:48 PM
2010 V6 Camaro more hp than Mustang GT LT1MAN Gen 5 Racing Tech 89 09-08-2008 07:28 PM
new rwd impala!!! jayklef5 LS4 Performance 34 12-11-2007 07:45 PM


Tags
14, 2010, 2012, camaro, camaros, hp, increase, mile, mods, mpg, mph, performance, turbo, twin, v6

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:50 AM.