cammed ls1 vs procharged gt
05-08-2009, 10:48 PM
#1
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Wood River, IL
Posts: 2,788
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
cammed ls1 vs procharged gt I drove through an intersection and saw a 99-04 black gt with some black wheels. You can tell he raced the car... black wheels, cowl good, etc. Anyways, I am going 35 in a 45 waiting for him to catch up. He drove past me a little bit so I sped up and threw him a rev. He down shifts and I can hear his blower. I drop down into second at 40. He honks it off. I jump out half a car and just keep pulling. We went from 40 to about 90-100. He let out when he was about 2 cars back. We went again from the same roll and the same result. We pulled into a gas station to talk a little. He has a D1 procharger and is running 8psi. I'm not really sure what they put down...? He said he has stock gears in it tho. My mods are in sig. I think the car performs better than the dyno results show. I am still running my junky falken tires. I got a pair of nittos in the garage
05-08-2009, 10:54 PM
#2
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Nice kill.
I'd say he was roughly low 400s. Maybe mid 400s pending other mods and tune. The gears are Definitely the major player in this....he has 3.27s to your 4.10s
Unless you heard him incorrectly and he has a P 1sc and not a D 1sc. Then he'd be in the mid upper 300s pending.
I'd say he was roughly low 400s. Maybe mid 400s pending other mods and tune. The gears are Definitely the major player in this....he has 3.27s to your 4.10s
Unless you heard him incorrectly and he has a P 1sc and not a D 1sc. Then he'd be in the mid upper 300s pending.
05-09-2009, 12:46 PM
#7
***Repost Police***
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Good kill, his car will be a lot stronger with those 3.73s. Sounds like you have a nice setup, and I'd wager it actually is stronger than the dyno numbers say 
Trending Topics
05-10-2009, 12:23 AM
#11
On The Tree
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: MA
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
op good kill tho.
05-10-2009, 11:45 AM
#12
10 Second Club
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Royal Palm Beach FL.
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
05-10-2009, 01:01 PM
#13
***Repost Police***
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I know... that's why I was saying that it will be different with 3.73s. And the "nice setup" was in reference to the OP.
05-10-2009, 01:48 PM
#14
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And yep....3.27s are junk for that. I was ok with my 3.55s, but still. 3.73s or 3.90s were my future route.
05-10-2009, 01:54 PM
#16
9 Second Club
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Lake Tahoe, CA
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
