Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

2010 vs ls-won

Old 07-24-2009, 03:09 PM
  #41  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
nitr0racing21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,010
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default





Old 07-24-2009, 03:10 PM
  #42  
Staging Lane
 
94Mustang302ci's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Tucker, Georgia
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by nitr0racing21
two secs bud
does your car trap 113 or 109 on motor... also the slip says 11.957 not 11.947 like u stated u ran. That's why I asked. You confirmed it not only in this thread but in your original thread. That you ran 11.947 @ 109mph not 11.957 @ 113.
Old 07-24-2009, 03:29 PM
  #43  
TECH Apprentice
 
ponygt65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Chicken Chow Mein and Pork Fried Rice?
Old 07-24-2009, 03:31 PM
  #44  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
adanieljohnson1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Frisco, TX
Posts: 2,742
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

^^^^^^^HAHAHAHAhahahaha....
Old 07-24-2009, 03:32 PM
  #45  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
nitr0racing21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,010
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 94Mustang302ci
does your car trap 113 or 109 on motor... also the slip says 11.957 not 11.947 like u stated u ran. That's why I asked. You confirmed it not only in this thread but in your original thread. That you ran 11.947 @ 109mph not 11.957 @ 113.


It was 957, I guess I thought it was 947 and it was 113 I thought it was 109
Old 07-24-2009, 03:33 PM
  #46  
Staging Lane
 
94Mustang302ci's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Tucker, Georgia
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by nitr0racing21
It was 957, I guess I thought it was 947 and it was 113 I thought it was 109
How could you think it was this or that if you're reading the time slip? This reminds me of the time Bitemark caught someone posting fake timeslips.
Old 07-24-2009, 03:50 PM
  #47  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
nitr0racing21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,010
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

BC until about 2 months ago I lost the timeslips they were in my folder that had all the car info on it, honestly I don't care if you believe the time or not I will repost some slips after I put some new radials and sub frames on it.
Old 07-24-2009, 03:53 PM
  #48  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
bballr4567's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Evansville, IN
Posts: 1,199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

What clutch are you using or are you auto?
Old 07-24-2009, 04:15 PM
  #49  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (10)
 
greatskiiiier's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 835
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

ok since i started the whole BS thing- im ganna defend this guy a lil-

1. in a roll race he would take an ss by a little if at all
2. the 11 second pass was on nitrous
3. saying "175mph" is like saying "i test drove a sentra ser and it has some *****"- is it true? no--- does it seem like it in the heat of the moment? perhaps
Old 07-24-2009, 04:52 PM
  #50  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
nitr0racing21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,010
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by greatskiiiier
ok since i started the whole BS thing- im ganna defend this guy a lil-

1. in a roll race he would take an ss by a little if at all
2. the 11 second pass was on nitrous
3. saying "175mph" is like saying "i test drove a sentra ser and it has some *****"- is it true? no--- does it seem like it in the heat of the moment? perhaps
True but the motor pass was a 11.957

11.9 is still in the 11\s


What stall you mean? Triple D 36-3800
Old 07-24-2009, 04:55 PM
  #51  
9 Second Club
 
ARCTIC '00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Lake Tahoe, CA
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by greatskiiiier
ok since i started the whole BS thing- im ganna defend this guy a lil-

1. in a roll race he would take an ss by a little if at all
2. the 11 second pass was on nitrous3. saying "175mph" is like saying "i test drove a sentra ser and it has some *****"- is it true? no--- does it seem like it in the heat of the moment? perhaps
I doubt an LS1 would be trapping 113 on a nitrous shot! 113mph sounds like a bolt-on car with suspension, gears & tires.
Old 07-24-2009, 05:16 PM
  #52  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
adanieljohnson1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Frisco, TX
Posts: 2,742
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Ok, I will need to see a time slip reflecting the car# while he stands next to the pit crew all giving him thumbs up while 94Mustang302ci reconfirms this slip by being in the picture!! We gonna have to 99_Z28 this dude! lol
Old 07-24-2009, 05:17 PM
  #53  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
adanieljohnson1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Frisco, TX
Posts: 2,742
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

speaking of 99_Z28! Were he at?
Old 07-24-2009, 05:24 PM
  #54  
Staging Lane
 
94Mustang302ci's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Tucker, Georgia
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ARCTIC '00
I doubt an LS1 would be trapping 113 on a nitrous shot! 113mph sounds like a bolt-on car with suspension, gears & tires.
Old 07-24-2009, 05:32 PM
  #55  
9 Second Club
 
ARCTIC '00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Lake Tahoe, CA
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 94Mustang302ci
oops.
Old 07-24-2009, 06:55 PM
  #56  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (10)
 
greatskiiiier's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 835
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ARCTIC '00
oops.
ya bitch! what 94mustang said!

lmao jk
Old 07-24-2009, 07:00 PM
  #57  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (7)
 
z28mccrory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Southern Indiana
Posts: 756
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I was silently following this thread waiting to see what happened.

I can believe the 11.9 @ 113.... 109 was simply too low... now that the 113 came out its much more believeable... especially since the car is hooking up good with a 1.6xx short time.

Im still sketchy on the 175mph street race. I guess it COULD happen... but thats DAMN fast on the street. Only time i've even been stupid enough to go that fast on public roads was on my bike.
Old 07-24-2009, 07:05 PM
  #58  
9 Second Club
 
ARCTIC '00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Lake Tahoe, CA
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by greatskiiiier
ya bitch! what 94mustang said! lmao jk
greatskiiiier
Old 07-24-2009, 08:29 PM
  #59  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (10)
 
greatskiiiier's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 835
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ARCTIC '00
greatskiiiier
lmao i hope your being just as serious as i was when i make that post
Old 07-25-2009, 09:07 AM
  #60  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (9)
 
OUTLAWZ RACING's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: COLUMBUS GA.
Posts: 2,726
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

come on 175mph it was a guess just got a little excited lol. Time slips who knows bro post a vid to show its true. What kind a suspension you have to cut such a good sixty?

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: 2010 vs ls-won



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:26 PM.