06 GTO vs Procharged 04 Mach 1 Mustang
06 GTO vs Procharged 04 Mach 1 Mustang 
04-23-2013, 12:17 PM
#2
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Howell & Fenton MI
Posts: 11,145
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes
on
15 Posts
I'm surprised you pulled that hard actually. Usually a blown stock bottom end Mach 1 makes 430-480 rwhp...that and they are a good bit lighter as well. My buddy has a LS2 Goat like yours with almost exactly the same mods, and it made 445 rwhp. Back when I had my 04 Mustang gt it was a dead nuts race pretty much with me at 390 rwhp. It was a bolt on and cammed 2 valve with a 100 shot. Nice job!
04-23-2013, 12:43 PM
#5
I'm surprised you pulled that hard actually. Usually a blown stock bottom end Mach 1 makes 430-480 rwhp...that and they are a good bit lighter as well. My buddy has a LS2 Goat like yours with almost exactly the same mods, and it made 445 rwhp. Back when I had my 04 Mustang gt it was a dead nuts race pretty much with me at 390 rwhp. It was a bolt on and cammed 2 valve with a 100 shot. Nice job!
Your 100 shot more and likely made a bit more torque that this guys Procharger. Some guys on the 100 shot picked up 125-130 ft-lbs at the wheels. Procharged seems to pickup less, around 90 ft-lbs at the same hp level.
I'm not a Mach 1 basher, here is my old Mach 1 when I was in Air Force 2001-2008 Active Duty. Also, I have a picture with my Nissan Silvia S15 when I was stationed at Royal Air Force (RAF) Mildenhall, England. And yes, I like rice.
Mach 1 and Slick | Flickr - Photo Sharing!@@AMEPARAM@@http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2340/2342699560_99264dd6f6_m.jpg@@AMEPARAM@@2342699560@@AMEPARAM@@99264dd6f6 Mach 1 and Slick | Flickr - Photo Sharing!@@AMEPARAM@@http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2340/2342699560_99264dd6f6_m.jpg@@AMEPARAM@@2342699560@@AMEPARAM@@99264dd6f6 by acts187kjv, on Flickr Mach 1King of the Hill | Flickr - Photo Sharing!@@AMEPARAM@@http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2370/2341871167_8f1cfe3751_m.jpg@@AMEPARAM@@2341871167@@AMEPARAM@@8f1cfe3751 Mach 1King of the Hill | Flickr - Photo Sharing!@@AMEPARAM@@http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2370/2341871167_8f1cfe3751_m.jpg@@AMEPARAM@@2341871167@@AMEPARAM@@8f1cfe3751 by acts187kjv, on Flickr Englands Best Stunters | Flickr - Photo Sharing!@@AMEPARAM@@http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2291/2341868833_f174048f2e_m.jpg@@AMEPARAM@@2341868833@@AMEPARAM@@f174048f2e Englands Best Stunters | Flickr - Photo Sharing!@@AMEPARAM@@http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2291/2341868833_f174048f2e_m.jpg@@AMEPARAM@@2341868833@@AMEPARAM@@f174048f2e by acts187kjv, on Flickr
04-23-2013, 12:49 PM
#6
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Howell & Fenton MI
Posts: 11,145
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes
on
15 Posts
That Mach looks good! Was it just a bolt ons car for the most part? Yeah my stang made about 500 rwtq with 3.90 gears so I know that helped. It would run with or beat in some cases centrifugal blow new edge gt's and Mach 1 stangs that were a good 40-50 more rwhp than me
04-23-2013, 01:38 PM
#7
That Mach looks good! Was it just a bolt ons car for the most part? Yeah my stang made about 500 rwtq with 3.90 gears so I know that helped. It would run with or beat in some cases centrifugal blow new edge gt's and Mach 1 stangs that were a good 40-50 more rwhp than me
Trending Topics
04-24-2013, 01:01 AM
#9
Well, I enjoy the GTO. It has more room and more power than my old Mach 1. My car isn't the fastest GTO in STL but I like it. Plus, I just won a USAC Sound Quality 1st place trophy this last weekend and hit 136db with on 12" sub.
04-24-2013, 06:50 PM
#12
Teching In
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Indy
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You could see how every time the Mach 1 shifted the GTO pulled over and had a picnic. That dude needs the driver mod.
04-24-2013, 07:06 PM
#15
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
04-24-2013, 07:09 PM
#16
Teching In
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Indy
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts