Ls1 gto vs 2.3 stroker evo 9
02-16-2014, 02:00 PM
#1
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Indiana
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ls1 gto vs 2.3 stroker evo 9 20 roll. Sorry for the wind noise lol. Gto makes 442 and the evo is a bigger turbo, cammed 2.3 stroker that makes 480 wheel and 500 tq.
40-110.
40-110.
02-16-2014, 02:21 PM
#4
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Indiana
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And thanks Evan! I think he went to a 5 speed for this year so maybe we can get in a better, longer run without him hitting the brakes lol
02-16-2014, 02:23 PM
#5
02-16-2014, 02:29 PM
#7
Depending on the PSI its at, it may or may not be a major problem.
Friend with a stock 9 longblock (no cams) upgraded turbo in 08ish (before the E85 craze down here) made low 5s on pump. Car was fast as hell back then, would **** up KB cobras.
Makes sense now, the stock evo9 with cams had like 30 something PSI running threw it. Good kill man.
Friend with a stock 9 longblock (no cams) upgraded turbo in 08ish (before the E85 craze down here) made low 5s on pump. Car was fast as hell back then, would **** up KB cobras.
Makes sense now, the stock evo9 with cams had like 30 something PSI running threw it. Good kill man.
Trending Topics
02-16-2014, 02:32 PM
#9
Depending on the PSI its at, it may or may not be a major problem.
Friend with a stock 9 longblock (no cams) upgraded turbo in 08ish (before the E85 craze down here) made low 5s on pump. Car was fast as hell back then, would **** up KB cobras.
Makes sense now, the stock evo9 with cams had like 30 something PSI running threw it. Good kill man.
Friend with a stock 9 longblock (no cams) upgraded turbo in 08ish (before the E85 craze down here) made low 5s on pump. Car was fast as hell back then, would **** up KB cobras.
Makes sense now, the stock evo9 with cams had like 30 something PSI running threw it. Good kill man.
The evo i raced this time last year is gunning for me. Constantly calling me out. He wasnt happy with not taking the W. I only made 420whp when i raced him and had no traction/couldnt shift. He made 440ish. Last i heard he made another 100whp with a built motor. That race might happen this year... He should get the win.
02-16-2014, 02:33 PM
#10
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Indiana
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That's what I asked him. He said he was going 120. Which I questioned because I was at 110 when I passed him IIRC. I really wish he would shifted 5th to see how it would turn out because I was in the meat of my power. Oh well I guess!
02-16-2014, 02:43 PM
#12
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Indiana
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Never driven one so i cannot comment, but i remember him having trans issue and he went all out and got a shep trans. He still owns it. It currently makes 700+ with a forged 2.0, thats why i say for a 2.3 thats terrible. Even on pump.
Video Link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t851OF5R2oc
Video Link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UXPBClNtrlw
Video Link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p06uE6qxzBU
02-18-2014, 08:16 AM
#19
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 965
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How do little motors like this make so much torque where a 480whp LS1, or LQ9 or whatever making that power would make significantly less torque... Isn't the "torque mod" a common hate term we muscle car guys use when making fun of imports?
