04 gto daily beater vs 32v swapped mustang gt
#1
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
04 gto daily beater vs 32v swapped mustang gt
So last night I catch my buddy out in his mustang he swapped a Lincoln mk8 32v 4.6 in his 98 gt car has pacesetter long tubes h pipe pypes catback sct tuner ud pullies 3.73 gears n k&n cone my gto is my daily has k&n intake flow master catback n spec stage 2 clutch So we line up says he needs to be at 3k in 2nd I say ok. Like a dummy I'm in first I beep 3 times wam rev limit his cars so loud I can't hear mine look
Down like **** hit second pull a car hit 3rd pull maybe another fender miss 4th he pulls a car ish shifts to 5th I start pulling he lets off Second race both take off he misses 3rd so I let off I was ahead 3rd race 30 roll I start in second pull a car hit 3rd stay about the same wam miss 4th again he keeps going now his head is huge talking all this smack
Down like **** hit second pull a car hit 3rd pull maybe another fender miss 4th he pulls a car ish shifts to 5th I start pulling he lets off Second race both take off he misses 3rd so I let off I was ahead 3rd race 30 roll I start in second pull a car hit 3rd stay about the same wam miss 4th again he keeps going now his head is huge talking all this smack
#2
11 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: St Louis, MO.
Posts: 624
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not really sure what's worse, the driving or lack of punctuation to figure all this out. Sounds like you've got the stronger car though, get a little more seat time and you'll pull him pretty good.
#6
11 Second Club
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 804
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I know right. My NA stock longblock turd only went 11's. How about yours?
OP, if that mustang shifted into 5th you guys must have been doing 130+. Good kill!
Mark 8 motors had smaller intake cams and a horrible intake compared to the 96-98 cobra motors. Still a big step up in power from the NPI 2v he had.
-Mark
OP, if that mustang shifted into 5th you guys must have been doing 130+. Good kill!
Mark 8 motors had smaller intake cams and a horrible intake compared to the 96-98 cobra motors. Still a big step up in power from the NPI 2v he had.
-Mark
#7
10 Second Club
I know right. My NA stock longblock turd only went 11's. How about yours?
OP, if that mustang shifted into 5th you guys must have been doing 130+. Good kill!
Mark 8 motors had smaller intake cams and a horrible intake compared to the 96-98 cobra motors. Still a big step up in power from the NPI 2v he had.
-Mark
OP, if that mustang shifted into 5th you guys must have been doing 130+. Good kill!
Mark 8 motors had smaller intake cams and a horrible intake compared to the 96-98 cobra motors. Still a big step up in power from the NPI 2v he had.
-Mark
Cool
Trending Topics
#11
TECH Enthusiast
dude he did it with a bolt on stock motor. its can be done but a person has to try.
https://ls1tech.com/forums/11-second...runs-11-s.html
https://ls1tech.com/forums/11-second...runs-11-s.html
#12
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
Good run op
Watch out....he'll put you on his ignore list.
my money would be on hammer's bolt-on vs bitey's 5.4
It's a gutted slick tired car. By comparison notch's car had a almost 3400 rw and no headers, no tune and on a dr went 11.9 @116 on a 1.76 60'
Now i have said and will say again that i thought bitey did as gooda job as anyone with a modular. But those engines have never been very impressive.
Watch out....he'll put you on his ignore list.
my money would be on hammer's bolt-on vs bitey's 5.4
dude he did it with a bolt on stock motor. its can be done but a person has to try.
https://ls1tech.com/forums/11-second...runs-11-s.html
https://ls1tech.com/forums/11-second...runs-11-s.html
Now i have said and will say again that i thought bitey did as gooda job as anyone with a modular. But those engines have never been very impressive.
#14
10 Second Club
#15
TECH Enthusiast
Good run op
Watch out....he'll put you on his ignore list.
my money would be on hammer's bolt-on vs bitey's 5.4
It's a gutted slick tired car. By comparison notch's car had a almost 3400 rw and no headers, no tune and on a dr went 11.9 @116 on a 1.76 60'
Now i have said and will say again that i thought bitey did as gooda job as anyone with a modular. But those engines have never been very impressive.
Watch out....he'll put you on his ignore list.
my money would be on hammer's bolt-on vs bitey's 5.4
It's a gutted slick tired car. By comparison notch's car had a almost 3400 rw and no headers, no tune and on a dr went 11.9 @116 on a 1.76 60'
Now i have said and will say again that i thought bitey did as gooda job as anyone with a modular. But those engines have never been very impressive.
of course the engine isnt impressive. 304 rwhp.
there are no qualifiers in the conversation. it ran 11's. end of story.
#16
TECH Enthusiast
his car is just lighter from the start. my 96gt weighed 3250ish new.
#17
11 Second Club
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 804
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#19
Staging Lane
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Rent Free in Hio's Mind
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes
on
30 Posts
Hio, nobody gives a **** about notch's old car or how shitty old GM motors are
You're learning from Daddy Hio well, I see.
"Here let me (insert something you'll never do) and I'll show you!"
No, you won't, your hypothetical will never become a reality.
GM side has been acting uncharacteristically desperate lately.
"Here let me (insert something you'll never do) and I'll show you!"
No, you won't, your hypothetical will never become a reality.
GM side has been acting uncharacteristically desperate lately.