Srt vs 2002 camaro
05-25-2016, 11:22 PM
#1
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Srt vs 2002 camaro So this guy has a 2006 chrysler 300 srt with the 6.1 and he says he can walk my z28. I was wondering the predicted outcome of it. I have a 2002 z28 6 speed monster stage 3 clutch with lighter flywheel, tick perf master cylinder . Texas speed longtubes and X pipe, Slp intake motor is pretty much stock except a tune. It makes about 360 rwhp on the dyno. The 300 is bone stock to the filter. I'm just curious as to what would happen.
Last edited by thumperz28; 05-25-2016 at 11:29 PM.
05-26-2016, 06:10 AM
#5
Staging Lane
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: NewHampshire
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
05-26-2016, 09:03 AM
#6
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've already invited him to the strip because he wanted to race my built corvette. He never showed. Only time we've ever "raced" was he was acting big because he was pulling on my dodge pickup on the highway. So ill try to pressure him into it lol
Trending Topics
05-26-2016, 12:12 PM
#9
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
05-26-2016, 06:26 PM
#11
12 Second Club
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Don't sleep on him or he will hurt your feelings. I ran 12.85@108.5 with a DA of +1872 bone stock on stock tires. Once I was I/E/T, I made 445hp at the wheels on 93 octane. My base line was 405. I've been beaten by much slower cars and beaten much faster cars at the strip due to mistakes on both sides...
05-26-2016, 08:07 PM
#12
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Don't sleep on him or he will hurt your feelings. I ran 12.85@108.5 with a DA of +1872 bone stock on stock tires. Once I was I/E/T, I made 445hp at the wheels on 93 octane. My base line was 405. I've been beaten by much slower cars and beaten much faster cars at the strip due to mistakes on both sides...
05-26-2016, 08:51 PM
#13
12 Second Club
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't have a tuned dyno sheet. It went with the car but I found the baseline.
05-26-2016, 10:39 PM
#14
Don't sleep on him or he will hurt your feelings. I ran 12.85@108.5 with a DA of +1872 bone stock on stock tires. Once I was I/E/T, I made 445hp at the wheels on 93 octane. My base line was 405. I've been beaten by much slower cars and beaten much faster cars at the strip due to mistakes on both sides...
05-30-2016, 12:27 PM
#15
Don't sleep on him or he will hurt your feelings. I ran 12.85@108.5 with a DA of +1872 bone stock on stock tires. Once I was I/E/T, I made 445hp at the wheels on 93 octane. My base line was 405. I've been beaten by much slower cars and beaten much faster cars at the strip due to mistakes on both sides...
05-30-2016, 07:14 PM
#17
12 Second Club
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
05-31-2016, 09:08 AM
#18
On The Tree
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Utah
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Don't sleep on him or he will hurt your feelings. I ran 12.85@108.5 with a DA of +1872 bone stock on stock tires. Once I was I/E/T, I made 445hp at the wheels on 93 octane. My base line was 405. I've been beaten by much slower cars and beaten much faster cars at the strip due to mistakes on both sides...
05-31-2016, 11:33 AM
#19
1. Generous dyno.
2. Uncorrected in favorable conditions.
Again...40rwhp too high.
Edit: A quick search revealed this:
https://ls1tech.com/forums/street-ra...l#post11494594
Originally Posted by ****** srt8
you should talk to Immo over on the charger boards. several of us were at DTP getting tuned the day he put down 441hp with 4th gear pulls. as far as i know he was the only one who did 4th gear tuning. i baselined at 405hp/410tq @170 mph in 4th w/intake and xhaust. tuned in 3d due to over speed errors w/baseline if 378hp/376tq and ended up with 404hp/395tq in 3d with my timing off 2*(bad gas). that translates roughly to 430+hp in 4th. i went back in Nov. for a hp competition and dynoed again without the tune @ 32* temp and put down 412hp/425tq w/4th gear pulls. i accidently for got to reprogram after maintenance @ Dodge and didn't realize till after the first pull and low #s. sure enough the ole Predator said "last tune written original backup". but this is the second eng in the car and the SRT guys brought the new one and installed it themselves or so i was told. one can potentially gain 40whp w/ just a u/d pulley or xhaust, intake and a Predator and that should put you somewhere around 415whp depending on the combo that is used. which would explain why a CMR tune is so much better than the canned tune. if you were to buy the SRT-8 eng as a crate eng they are conservatively rated @ 450hp. a good tune to milk the eng and some minor mods will fix that. i could always e-mail you my tune but i don't think it would work for ya.
https://ls1tech.com/forums/12-second...l#post11761098
Originally Posted by ****** srt8
THX everyone. violent celerity i don't know. i never got the chance to run it bone stock. sorry
https://ls1tech.com/forums/street-ra...l#post11613128
Originally Posted by ****** srt8
temp was 82.9*, humidity was 58%, 75ft elevation, DA 1841, and the track sucked if that gives you enough info to decipher and critique my runs. corrected numbers were 12.92@109.647. I’ll have all the slips as soon as I figure out how to convert them to digits. thanks for the advice guys if you are here.
my best run looked like this
RT .2003 best was .0702
60FT 2.0586
330FT 5.6853
1/8ET 8.5845
1/8 MPH 85.31
1/4ET 13.1964
¼ MPH 107.30
my best run looked like this
RT .2003 best was .0702
60FT 2.0586
330FT 5.6853
1/8ET 8.5845
1/8 MPH 85.31
1/4ET 13.1964
¼ MPH 107.30
Last edited by Marc 85Z28; 05-31-2016 at 06:34 PM.
05-31-2016, 08:18 PM
#20
TECH Resident
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: heading South East on Bakalakadaka street
Posts: 819
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Agreed.
I saw what you posted. I understand what it represents, and you very clearly do not.
1. Generous dyno.
2. Uncorrected in favorable conditions.
Again...40rwhp too high.
Edit: A quick search revealed this:
https://ls1tech.com/forums/street-ra...l#post11494594
And this:
https://ls1tech.com/forums/12-second...l#post11761098
AND THIS:
https://ls1tech.com/forums/street-ra...l#post11613128
That 405rwhp "baseline" of yours was with a tune, intake, and exhaust. That is the setup that ran 12.8 @ 108 two months later. Did it really run that number, or is that what you corrected it to? THAT is a bit more realistic. Why lie?
1. Generous dyno.
2. Uncorrected in favorable conditions.
Again...40rwhp too high.
Edit: A quick search revealed this:
https://ls1tech.com/forums/street-ra...l#post11494594
And this:
https://ls1tech.com/forums/12-second...l#post11761098
AND THIS:
https://ls1tech.com/forums/street-ra...l#post11613128
That 405rwhp "baseline" of yours was with a tune, intake, and exhaust. That is the setup that ran 12.8 @ 108 two months later. Did it really run that number, or is that what you corrected it to? THAT is a bit more realistic. Why lie?
