Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

TT 5.0 vs Paxton 5.0 vs N20 LS3 vette

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-22-2016, 07:02 PM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
abenitez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default TT 5.0 vs Paxton 5.0 vs N20 LS3 vette

Old 08-22-2016, 07:18 PM
  #2  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
HCI2000SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Howell & Fenton MI
Posts: 11,145
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

That's either one fast vette or one slow 800 hp 5.0 lol. Nice runs
Old 08-26-2016, 09:11 PM
  #3  
Teching In
 
99whitez28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Something is wrong here.....800hp 5.bro? it looks like all of them were at 600hp lol. I know a proper 100 shot tuned LS3 is no joke though....
Old 08-26-2016, 11:23 PM
  #4  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,927
Received 412 Likes on 330 Posts

Default

Good runs
Old 08-27-2016, 02:38 AM
  #5  
Launching!
iTrader: (2)
 
Prototype007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 252
Received 34 Likes on 23 Posts

Default

Great races!
Old 08-27-2016, 08:01 AM
  #6  
Staging Lane
 
408-99-f's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: NewHampshire
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Nice runs, if he had a cam specd for exactly his setup and shot in a ls3, with a good tune. I should run pretty damn hard. Plus who know what these cars really weigh.
Old 08-27-2016, 08:11 AM
  #7  
On The Tree
 
WTF?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Houston Tx
Posts: 151
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

600+ on 6lbs? Are those things really that efficient?
Old 08-27-2016, 04:10 PM
  #8  
Staging Lane
 
408-99-f's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: NewHampshire
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by WTF?
600+ on 6lbs? Are those things really that efficient?
With the twins on a great flowing engine like the coyote I believe it. My car made 550 hp 549 tq on 6-7 psi (turned down all the way) through a 3600 stall unlocked. I have extra cubes, but with the added CR, cam actuation, valves etc, the coyote seems to be a great boost engine.
Old 08-27-2016, 04:17 PM
  #9  
Teching In
 
Its Stock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Southern, IL
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Yes, they are that efficient. I will be mid 700's on only 10psi.
Old 08-27-2016, 05:18 PM
  #10  
TECH Regular
 
Dimeomboost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Emory Texas currently
Posts: 484
Received 18 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Its Stock
Yes, they are that efficient. I will be mid 700's on only 10psi.
what kind of soecs are on this turbo also is it a stock cam engine or have u already done a full build just adding the turbo now or turbo only that would be a very very effecient turbo to make 700at the wheels on 10psi with out having a good bit of lag or being small enough to cause back pressure issues either way id it hits 700 the coyote is def. underestimated in the power adder group
Old 08-27-2016, 05:43 PM
  #11  
Teching In
 
Its Stock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Southern, IL
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Dimeomboost
what kind of soecs are on this turbo also is it a stock cam engine or have u already done a full build just adding the turbo now or turbo only that would be a very very effecient turbo to make 700at the wheels on 10psi with out having a good bit of lag or being small enough to cause back pressure issues either way id it hits 700 the coyote is def. underestimated in the power adder group
Mine? T4, 60mm, .70 AR. They are twins. My car is a 100% stock motor. Never been opened.

It's not against the ordinary for these cars to make that much with boost, they love it. Twin cars don't really have to deal with backpressure issues. It was some of the earlier single kits that had issues with that. Hellion's single kit had it so bad they quit making it. EDP had to change the hotside completely and go with a bigger downpipe.
Old 08-28-2016, 12:09 AM
  #12  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (19)
 
oscs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 3,903
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Its Stock
Yes, they are that efficient. I will be mid 700's on only 10psi.
At what SCR?
Old 08-28-2016, 11:50 AM
  #13  
Teching In
 
Its Stock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Southern, IL
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Scr??
Old 08-28-2016, 12:24 PM
  #14  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (14)
 
RealQuick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: MA
Posts: 3,970
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Its Stock
Scr??
Static compression ratio?
Old 08-28-2016, 12:58 PM
  #15  
Teching In
 
Its Stock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Southern, IL
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

That's what I was thinking too, but didn't want to assume. Stock coyote CR. 11.0:1.
Old 08-28-2016, 02:29 PM
  #16  
TECH Regular
 
Dimeomboost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Emory Texas currently
Posts: 484
Received 18 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Its Stock
Mine? T4, 60mm, .70 AR. They are twins. My car is a 100% stock motor. Never been opened.

It's not against the ordinary for these cars to make that much with boost, they love it. Twin cars don't really have to deal with backpressure issues. It was some of the earlier single kits that had issues with that. Hellion's single kit had it so bad they quit making it. EDP had to change the hotside completely and go with a bigger downpipe.
i missed the the part where it said twins so i can see two smaller turbos being very effecient and no lag time and with only 4 cylinders worth of pressure on each one back pressure is obviously minimal im sure either awesome.build wish u lived closer noone around here with a turbo car wants to run unless its at the track and to be honest there are very few high hp cars on the road here. pro dyno has probably 30 mustangs at every show with 1k hp setup and ive seen them all be loaded and unloaded from box trailers. i cant see having the hp they all have in brand new mustangs that they never drive
Old 08-28-2016, 11:33 PM
  #17  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (19)
 
oscs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 3,903
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Its Stock
That's what I was thinking too, but didn't want to assume. Stock coyote CR. 11.0:1.
Yes static compression ratio
Old 08-28-2016, 11:43 PM
  #18  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (19)
 
oscs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 3,903
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by WTF?
600+ on 6lbs? Are those things really that efficient?
SCR is 11:0 600@6 or even 700+ on 10 isn't that different than any other similarly sized modern V8
Old 08-30-2016, 06:04 AM
  #19  
TECH Apprentice
 
Dennis5374's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Modulars love boost and are insanely efficient . There's a reason they got banned from the engine masters too bad they aren't as cost efficient as the ls engines, nothing beats a pushrod v8 in the hp per dollar category .
Old 08-31-2016, 03:01 PM
  #20  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
abenitez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

the tt 5.0 is mine just picked it up ac couple weeks ago. made 630 on 6lbs were hoping on 12lbs and e85 it will make over 800 if the stock fuel system lets us lol.


Quick Reply: TT 5.0 vs Paxton 5.0 vs N20 LS3 vette



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:30 AM.