2016 Camaro SS runs 11.5 @ 121 mph, Drag Radials ONLY
12-14-2016, 05:05 PM
#42
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You're a complete ******* clown. You sit on here and flap your gums about all the **** Ford cars can't do when it turns out 1) they can and 2) the Chevy aftermarket can't seem to make these LT1's do something worth a ****.
You are an ignorant, brand loyal hater who refuses to accept what is right the **** in front of your face. We'll toss that in on top of being a shady lying mother ****** who is scared to death to race a well modded coyote car.
You are an ignorant, brand loyal hater who refuses to accept what is right the **** in front of your face. We'll toss that in on top of being a shady lying mother ****** who is scared to death to race a well modded coyote car.
12-14-2016, 05:16 PM
#44
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
12-14-2016, 06:02 PM
#50
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I just PROVED how ignorant you really are. 
12-14-2016, 06:16 PM
#52
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
^ Proof that Marc and Scotty don't know jack **** and just talk out of their ignorant asses.
12-14-2016, 06:24 PM
#54
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
12-14-2016, 06:30 PM
#55
It's sad how much back and forth Ford vs GM 
goes on in here. I prefer GM cars, but damn some of the new mustangs I seen at barrett jackson had me drooling...
I can't get over GM getting rid of the LS motor lol. I understand the need to improve, but the LS motors were getting 30mpg and making great power and my favorite thing was the simplicity to them. You could spend $600 and have a complete cam kit to add 50hp and it only took about 3-4 hours. Now all the VVT and direct injection ect ect just kind of takes away from that.
Why they thought they needed to change all but, 2 bolts on the engine I don't know. Seems like that could have just tweaked the LS engine for better fuel mileage atleast for awhile longer..
goes on in here. I prefer GM cars, but damn some of the new mustangs I seen at barrett jackson had me drooling...I can't get over GM getting rid of the LS motor lol. I understand the need to improve, but the LS motors were getting 30mpg and making great power and my favorite thing was the simplicity to them. You could spend $600 and have a complete cam kit to add 50hp and it only took about 3-4 hours. Now all the VVT and direct injection ect ect just kind of takes away from that.
Why they thought they needed to change all but, 2 bolts on the engine I don't know. Seems like that could have just tweaked the LS engine for better fuel mileage atleast for awhile longer..
12-14-2016, 06:56 PM
#56
Staging Lane
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: NewHampshire
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Lots of new tables in the engine, and trans to learn. As well as DI. It just isn't growing real fast. Lots to learn and research for every one. Only time will tell, coyote is a great motor with a good aftermarket, but the leap from the old platform probably wasn't as drastic on the tuning side. LT could be a inferior to the LS in the long run, but it's too early to tell. If and its a big if what the LT evolves to is better than the coyote. Then what? Will you put it on the pedestal you put the coyote on?
12-14-2016, 07:38 PM
#58
Staging Lane
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: NewHampshire
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
12-14-2016, 07:46 PM
#60
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts