2016 camaro ss lt1 589/572 all motor build (not my car)
12-17-2016, 11:43 AM
#24
11 Second Club
What gets me is how much torque these new LT's produce. Say comparing a 700hp LS7 & 700hp LT (stroker 427-429). The LT's do seem to be producing 40-50 more lb/ft of torque.
12-17-2016, 05:45 PM
#27
TECH Enthusiast
Is HHP/Chuck known for blowing up motors?
I half assed thought about using them for LT tuning..
I didn't think the numbers were bad on the camaro.. 429 making 589rwhp with a stock intake? Sounds pretty good to me. A real intake would put it at 620+
That is about what a head/cam LS7(427) makes and it's well known to have much bigger heads and better flowing intake.
A big bore is always going to make more top end power then a medium bore/large stroke.
12-17-2016, 05:52 PM
#28
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Clear Lake Tx
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Is HHP/Chuck known for blowing up motors?
I half assed thought about using them for LT tuning..
I didn't think the numbers were bad on the camaro.. 429 making 589rwhp with a stock intake? Sounds pretty good to me. A real intake would put it at 620+
That is about what a head/cam LS7(427) makes and it's well known to have much bigger heads and better flowing intake.
A big bore is always going to make more top end power then a medium bore/large stroke.
I half assed thought about using them for LT tuning..
I didn't think the numbers were bad on the camaro.. 429 making 589rwhp with a stock intake? Sounds pretty good to me. A real intake would put it at 620+
That is about what a head/cam LS7(427) makes and it's well known to have much bigger heads and better flowing intake.
A big bore is always going to make more top end power then a medium bore/large stroke.
