Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

SCT 2016 Mustang GT vs Tuned 2016 Camaro SS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-06-2017, 12:37 PM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
c6ftw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default SCT 2016 Mustang GT vs Tuned 2016 Camaro SS


2016 Mustang GT JLT Intake, Cat delete, SCT Tune

2016 Camaro SS, Muffler Delete, Diablosport Tune.

Both Stick on 91 Octane gas. Mustang w/ Extra passenger.

Old 03-06-2017, 12:46 PM
  #2  
Launching!
iTrader: (10)
 
sw07gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 232
Received 41 Likes on 22 Posts

Default

As expected. The 6th gen is a full second faster stock and barely faster modded.
Old 03-06-2017, 12:55 PM
  #3  
7 Second Club
 
islander033's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Crossfield, AB
Posts: 239
Received 313 Likes on 242 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by sw07gt
As expected. The 6th gen is a full second faster stock and barely faster modded.
I agree.

Terrible toons on both cars (if just SCT/diablo toons) and should have swapped passenger on a dig/roll.

What tires on both cars?
Old 03-06-2017, 12:56 PM
  #4  
Launching!
iTrader: (10)
 
sw07gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 232
Received 41 Likes on 22 Posts

Default

At least they're running equal power adder.
Old 03-06-2017, 12:58 PM
  #5  
7 Second Club
 
islander033's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Crossfield, AB
Posts: 239
Received 313 Likes on 242 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by sw07gt
At least they're running equal power adder.
Were they both on 93 nitro fuels?
Old 03-06-2017, 12:59 PM
  #6  
Launching!
iTrader: (10)
 
sw07gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 232
Received 41 Likes on 22 Posts

Default

91 nitro fuel. Which I think given the setup on the 2 cars is good for a gain of well over 400 whp.
Old 03-06-2017, 01:04 PM
  #7  
7 Second Club
 
islander033's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Crossfield, AB
Posts: 239
Received 313 Likes on 242 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by sw07gt
91 nitro fuel. Which I think given the setup on the 2 cars is good for a gain of well over 400 whp.
Fack! That's pretty good for pump gas.
Old 03-06-2017, 01:06 PM
  #8  
Teching In
 
BlkMach1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: S. Fla.
Posts: 36
Received 115 Likes on 87 Posts

Default

Tire stencils cost the LTjuan a couple lengths.
Old 03-06-2017, 01:20 PM
  #9  
Staging Lane
 
V8EATR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 71
Received 19 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Damn good runs. No passenger that would be close. Camaro must need maintenance, didn't gap enough.
Old 03-06-2017, 02:12 PM
  #10  
On The Tree
 
Captain Slow's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: FortLauderdale/Orlando
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Can this letters on the tire trend go away now, please? Looks awful.
Old 03-06-2017, 02:18 PM
  #11  
Teching In
 
MaxxRPM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Stl
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

As expected.......
Old 03-06-2017, 02:38 PM
  #12  
Banned
 
RedFuryZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The more modded br0 still got walked bad. Even after jumping the first time.
Old 03-06-2017, 02:40 PM
  #13  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (13)
 
UltraZLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Hanover, Michigan
Posts: 1,264
Received 55 Likes on 40 Posts

Default

Cool vid.
Old 03-06-2017, 02:40 PM
  #14  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (55)
 
Mike Morris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Md/PA/FL
Posts: 1,602
Received 61 Likes on 50 Posts

Default

Good vid
Old 03-06-2017, 02:41 PM
  #15  
Launching!
iTrader: (10)
 
sw07gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 232
Received 41 Likes on 22 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by RedFuryZ28
The more modded br0 still got walked bad. Even after jumping the first time.


But Jake, stock the difference is 8-10 car lengths. Modded with the Mustang having a passenger this Camaro barely eeks out 1 car. You're saying that's impressive?
Old 03-06-2017, 02:44 PM
  #16  
Banned
 
RedFuryZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sw07gt
But Jake, stock the difference is 8-10 car lengths. Modded with the Mustang having a passenger this Camaro barely eeks out 1 car. You're saying that's impressive?
Barely? The less modded SS would have won by like 5 cars easy, had the 5.br0 not jumped from a dig. And who knows how many mods the mustang was concealing.
Old 03-06-2017, 03:32 PM
  #17  
On The Tree
 
Nick.H's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Dirty D, CA
Posts: 134
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Probably the same amount the camaro was hiding
Old 03-06-2017, 04:05 PM
  #18  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (6)
 
MonmouthCtyLS7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Rotonda West Florida
Posts: 3,955
Received 30 Likes on 27 Posts

Default

Those new LT1's move
Old 03-07-2017, 08:16 AM
  #19  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,927
Received 412 Likes on 330 Posts

Default

I was actually surprised the camaro won when i seen someone actually put some thought into running those big azz white letter cheese dick tires.

Just goes to show how hard it is for a more modded 5br0 to keep up with a sexgen.
Old 03-07-2017, 10:03 AM
  #20  
Teching In
 
2003Cobro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 9
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

You guys are nuts. That CAI is sure gonna make a HUGE difference in the run. Truth is shown in the runs. Suxgen is slightly quicker. We all know this.


Quick Reply: SCT 2016 Mustang GT vs Tuned 2016 Camaro SS



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:03 PM.