Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

LS1 vs. Bikes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-08-2007, 01:34 PM
  #1  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
 
Sluggish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Fannett, Tx
Posts: 1,316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default LS1 vs. Bikes

i've heard that an ls1 with only a few mods can beat 600cc bike from 70 and 80 rolls......is this true........i've been wanting to race one to see but there hard to find
Sluggish is offline  
Old 01-08-2007, 01:38 PM
  #2  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
 
MrDude_1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 3,366
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

from a highspeed roll, the bikes do have a disadvantage..... ive been in friends cars that beat 600s.... and my car has beat a couple too... but you have to be in a hwy speed roll.. any slower and you'll need a drag suspension amount of hook (along with the power) to get them....
MrDude_1 is offline  
Old 01-08-2007, 01:39 PM
  #3  
TECH Enthusiast
 
z28hustle's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 600
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

might need more than a few bolt ons bikes run low 12's easy
z28hustle is offline  
Old 01-08-2007, 01:45 PM
  #4  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
 
MrDude_1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 3,366
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by z28hustle
might need more than a few bolt ons bikes run low 12's easy

think about it before you post.

from a DEAD STOP, yea...... why do they run 12s? is it the power to weight? no....
its from the low weight overall, allowing them to accelerate faster from down low... they dont pull as hard uptop..


running them from a fast roll, they lose that weight advantage to a degree, and the actual horsepower matters more..... and thats where a bolton LS1 can walk them... and a mild cammed one can jog away....
MrDude_1 is offline  
Old 01-08-2007, 01:45 PM
  #5  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
METALBEAST's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Cleveland, Georgia
Posts: 3,027
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Low 12s? My friends have run low 11s @ 123-125 with R6s bone stock.
METALBEAST is offline  
Old 01-08-2007, 02:36 PM
  #6  
Teching In
 
WRX-ERROR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Wilkes Barre, Pa
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MrDude_1
think about it before you post.

from a DEAD STOP, yea...... why do they run 12s? is it the power to weight?
12's? Yeah make a 1980's 600cc.
WRX-ERROR is offline  
Old 01-08-2007, 02:39 PM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
landstuhltaylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: CBUS
Posts: 1,279
Received 45 Likes on 26 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MrDude_1
think about it before you post.

from a DEAD STOP, yea...... why do they run 12s? is it the power to weight? no....
its from the low weight overall, allowing them to accelerate faster from down low... they dont pull as hard uptop..


running them from a fast roll, they lose that weight advantage to a degree, and the actual horsepower matters more..... and thats where a bolton LS1 can walk them... and a mild cammed one can jog away....
incorrect. the bikes get raped by aerodynamic losses. they just plain suck when compared to cars.
landstuhltaylor is offline  
Old 01-08-2007, 03:20 PM
  #8  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
 
MrDude_1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 3,366
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by landstuhltaylor
incorrect. the bikes get raped by aerodynamic losses. they just plain suck when compared to cars.

i totally agree..

now, since you want to say incorrect.... tell me the incorrect part....

btw, notice i never said what or why.... i didnt think i needed to, but please, quote and school me.


WRX-ERROR:
someone of my fatass stature that didnt ride perfectly would ride low 12s.... yes 11s are certainly where they should be considered to be, but i was mostly talking to the person i quoted. they said 12s and i wasnt going to argue over a meaningless number.
MrDude_1 is offline  
Old 01-08-2007, 04:11 PM
  #9  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
99Z28LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 1,886
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

careful fellas, all it takes is a half way decent rider and you're done. before my cam, i would hang with R6's and they would PULL up top. i can at the katanas like nothing but R6's and stuff are quick. i have yet to race one after the cam, before i do race 1, im going to get my extra 2psi and then race, i want to have everything right before i go race 1.

just my .02
99Z28LS1 is offline  
Old 01-08-2007, 04:34 PM
  #10  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
98Z28MASS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,964
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Yea you can pull on an r6 if you race from a 80-160 mph roll, but whats the point?
98Z28MASS is offline  
Old 01-08-2007, 04:53 PM
  #11  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (19)
 
crazylane's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Whidbey Island, Wa.
Posts: 965
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I have played with a few bikes, and I have owned a 600 CBRF4I, It is all in how you work your gears, My bike did not redline until 16 grand, I could be in first going 73 before I would have to shift. Meaning if I decided to, I could pop it into second and have almost as good as 1st acceleration. It all depends on the rider and what he knows his bike is capable off. And I weighted in at 185. Just becarefull, bikes are fast as hell no matter what, and it is really hard to tell what they have done to them. Just a simple switche of the can (meaning muffler), can increase there performance.

Lane
crazylane is offline  
Old 01-08-2007, 05:36 PM
  #12  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
landstuhltaylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: CBUS
Posts: 1,279
Received 45 Likes on 26 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MrDude_1
i totally agree..

now, since you want to say incorrect.... tell me the incorrect part....

btw, notice i never said what or why.... i didnt think i needed to, but please, quote and school me.
i thought you were trying to say it only had to do with weight and horsepower, nothing about aerodynamics.
landstuhltaylor is offline  
Old 01-08-2007, 05:39 PM
  #13  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (2)
 
mattraypharbor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: palmharbor/Clearwater,FL
Posts: 979
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

u need 11s...
mattraypharbor is offline  
Old 01-08-2007, 05:43 PM
  #14  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
sleeperstyle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: hatboro, pa
Posts: 1,284
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

bolt-on ls1 beating any of the NEWER 600's= never happen. i've raced a few from a dig and won every time, but using the juice and they were always closing the gap on the big-end.
sleeperstyle is offline  
Old 01-08-2007, 05:51 PM
  #15  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (2)
 
mattraypharbor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: palmharbor/Clearwater,FL
Posts: 979
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

how big of a converter do you have sleeperstyle?
mattraypharbor is offline  
Old 01-08-2007, 05:58 PM
  #16  
Teching In
 
Joezee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Springhill FL.
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

100+hp at under 600lbs with rider, against 400fwhp at 3500lbs....hmmmm....the only bike you will beat is a 10 year old one.
TODAY'S 600s run low 11s in the mid 120s......they don't lose power over 100mph or something....they FREAKIN RUN AWAY and dissapear into the horizon......
a bolt-on ls1 WILL lose to a 600 by as far as the bike wants......
Joezee is offline  
Old 01-08-2007, 06:58 PM
  #17  
Launching!
iTrader: (2)
 
SSickLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Odessa Tx. "oilfeild country"
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

my boy has a 01' yzf 600r (not R6) and ive spanked him several times from as low as 40 rolls up to 120 or soi. I wont lie, the kid is fat and not a very good rider but i can sat i beat a 600 sportbike. Ive gotten walked by stock gsxr 600s etc. though. Douches that think theyre fast on 250 ninjas are the easiest prey.
SSickLS1 is offline  
Old 01-08-2007, 06:59 PM
  #18  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
sleeperstyle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: hatboro, pa
Posts: 1,284
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mattraypharbor
how big of a converter do you have sleeperstyle?
yank eliminator 3800. pm me if you have specific questions so as to not get too far off topic.
sleeperstyle is offline  
Old 01-08-2007, 07:03 PM
  #19  
TECH Enthusiast
 
2000 SILVERADO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 656
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yeah, I don't know what some of you guys are taking about. Any of the newer 600s with a good rider is in no way a match for a bolt on only LS1. There top speed may not be as good, but they get there a lot faster.
2000 SILVERADO is offline  
Old 01-08-2007, 07:10 PM
  #20  
Launching!
iTrader: (2)
 
SSickLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Odessa Tx. "oilfeild country"
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I wouldnt even waste the mechanical stress trying to race one from a dig.
Or a new one with a good rider at all.

Last edited by SSickLS1; 01-08-2007 at 07:13 PM. Reason: stupid
SSickLS1 is offline  


Quick Reply: LS1 vs. Bikes



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:44 PM.