Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

H/C Mach1's that slow compared to H/C LS1's?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-23-2007, 07:47 PM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
RED04Z06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default H/C Mach1's that slow compared to H/C LS1's?

Ok last night I went out to watch a race between these two cars. It was a 01' Z28 with H/C, bolt-ons, 3.73's, M6 against a 04' Mach1 with H/C, bolt-ons, 3.90's(I believe), M5. They were both on ET streets and racing the 1/4. The Z28 would straight stomp that Mach1 though, By at least 6+ cars everytime. I know they were both tuned and that the Z28 had 461rwhp and 441rwtq. But people are usually saying how these two cars stock are a great race, but when it comes to modding, does a LS1 get that far ahead?
RED04Z06 is offline  
Old 01-23-2007, 08:33 PM
  #2  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (3)
 
rk_2000_Z/28's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Enid, OK
Posts: 827
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Anything can happen on the street, no matter what the setups are...I guess I'd have to know more about the Mach and it's driver


I hope this thread doesn't get to ugly...
rk_2000_Z/28 is offline  
Old 01-23-2007, 08:41 PM
  #3  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (23)
 
brad8266's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Watertown, NY
Posts: 8,797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rk_2000_Z/28
Anything can happen on the street, no matter what the setups are...I guess I'd have to know more about the Mach and it's driver


I hope this thread doesn't get to ugly...
yeah anything can happen on the street, but the Machs are not too be taken lightly, they are pretty fast, i dont know what the deal was with that one.

You know its gonna get ugly real quick, just like evetry thread that involves a Mach 1 and an LS1.
brad8266 is offline  
Old 01-23-2007, 08:44 PM
  #4  
TECH Apprentice
 
ponygt65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It is becuase of the 'modular' design. They do not utilize the cams like a pushrod does. Not to mention, there are ALOT more options out there for pushrods cams than there is Mod cams.

Pending setup...that mach could be as low as 350 RWHP, and as high as 400+ RWHP. Either way. A 281 CID Mod motor isn't going to see 450+ RWHP N/A "very easily", if at all.

Basically: Design differences.

rk - no need to get ugly.
ponygt65 is offline  
Old 01-23-2007, 08:49 PM
  #5  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Tainted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 8,425
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

the z28 could have also had a much more radical set up than the mach 1
Tainted is offline  
Old 01-23-2007, 08:51 PM
  #6  
On The Tree
iTrader: (14)
 
blertawho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

i wouldnt expect to see as high of gains from H/C in a mach 1 as i would an ls1. its already a 4V head and i remember one of the big mags doing a cam swap in their 98 cobra and they only got like 20hp or something (point of the story is i dont remember it being high), and the 281cu isnt helping it at all .
blertawho is offline  
Old 01-23-2007, 08:52 PM
  #7  
Teching In
 
Jester's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The 4v motor needs a different intake to compliment the cams too. The stocker 'suffocates' the motor to death at higher engine speed where the 4v's hp curve should continue to rise well past 7,000+ rpm.

Just for reference, with my H/C/I setup I ran 382 rwhp with a very lean tune.

Nothing light about a H/C LS1. They are mean...
Jester is offline  
Old 01-23-2007, 09:06 PM
  #8  
TECH Apprentice
 
ponygt65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jester
The 4v motor needs a different intake to compliment the cams too. The stocker 'suffocates' the motor to death at higher engine speed where the 4v's hp curve should continue to rise well past 7,000+ rpm.

Just for reference, with my H/C/I setup I ran 382 rwhp with a very lean tune.

Nothing light about a H/C LS1. They are mean...

Thanks Mike for the hard numbers........and that is with a Sullivan Intake? or the FR?

ponygt65 is offline  
Old 01-23-2007, 09:33 PM
  #9  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (23)
 
brad8266's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Watertown, NY
Posts: 8,797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Id love to have a 400Hp N/A mach with some 4.56 gears, that would be moving
brad8266 is offline  
Old 01-23-2007, 09:49 PM
  #10  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (5)
 
J E T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Canal Winchester, OH
Posts: 583
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by rk_2000_Z/28
I hope this thread doesn't get to ugly...
You know it will. Mustang haters lurk in every thread, even if the topic isn't even about a Mustang...someone still throws a "Mustangs suck" phrase in there.

But to answer your question...more details are needed on both cars. The LS1 might of had a more radical H/C setup than the Mach 1 guy. Who knows, maybe they both made similar power, but the Z28 driver was just one hell of a driver, while the Mach 1 guy isn't the greatest shifter. But more details are needed on both setups.
J E T is offline  
Old 01-23-2007, 09:53 PM
  #11  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (11)
 
MrDavid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Upstate, SC
Posts: 541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

What kind of heads and cam package on an is laying down 460 on motor alone. Whatever that is, it must be a BEAST! Sounds like MS4 and some very expensive, extremely high-flowing heads. I rarely see more than 435 on a H/C LS1 without a fast 90/90 setup.
MrDavid is offline  
Old 01-23-2007, 10:23 PM
  #12  
Teching In
 
Oldbones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Houston/Kansas City
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RED04Z06
Ok last night I went out to watch a race between these two cars. It was a 01' Z28 with H/C, bolt-ons, 3.73's, M6 against a 04' Mach1 with H/C, bolt-ons, 3.90's(I believe), M5. They were both on ET streets and racing the 1/4. The Z28 would straight stomp that Mach1 though, By at least 6+ cars everytime. I know they were both tuned and that the Z28 had 461rwhp and 441rwtq. But people are usually saying how these two cars stock are a great race, but when it comes to modding, does a LS1 get that far ahead?

Modular motors need a little boost to make up for there small CI
Oldbones is offline  
Old 01-23-2007, 10:37 PM
  #13  
Tech Resident
 
ChocoTaco369's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Philly
Posts: 5,117
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

they may run similar stock, but built, the LS1's potential is far greater than any mustang motor of recent. the mach 1 doesn't have the displacement or the liters of the LS1. once you start modding internals, the LS1's displacement advantage really shows as every internal modification will be greater on an LS1 than a mach. that and, as it was already said, the LS1 is a pushrod motor and has a lot more cam choices than a mach. the LS1 is simply a better motor, hands down, no question about it, and modding it will show that for sure.
ChocoTaco369 is offline  
Old 01-23-2007, 11:55 PM
  #14  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
RED04Z06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 2K1WS6TA
What kind of heads and cam package on an is laying down 460 on motor alone. Whatever that is, it must be a BEAST! Sounds like MS4 and some very expensive, extremely high-flowing heads. I rarely see more than 435 on a H/C LS1 without a fast 90/90 setup.
Sorry!!!, Forgot to mention Z28 did have a 90/90 set-up, and the Mach also had an intake also. I remember I was forgetting something about the two cars. And the Mach has Stage 3 cams, that is all I know.
RED04Z06 is offline  
Old 01-23-2007, 11:56 PM
  #15  
Teching In
 
Mach1Mustang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Concord, N.C.
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ChocoTaco369
they may run similar stock, but built, the LS1's potential is far greater than any mustang motor of recent. the mach 1 doesn't have the displacement or the liters of the LS1. once you start modding internals, the LS1's displacement advantage really shows as every internal modification will be greater on an LS1 than a mach. that and, as it was already said, the LS1 is a pushrod motor and has a lot more cam choices than a mach. the LS1 is simply a better motor, hands down, no question about it, and modding it will show that for sure.
wow you are so right. the sc cobras suck......
when you mod anything it comes out to how much you want to spend, the ls1 is much cheaper to mod, so it can make more power cheaply.
Mach1Mustang is offline  
Old 01-24-2007, 12:04 AM
  #16  
Staging Lane
 
Angus66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RED04Z06
Ok last night I went out to watch a race between these two cars. It was a 01' Z28 with H/C, bolt-ons, 3.73's, M6 against a 04' Mach1 with H/C, bolt-ons, 3.90's(I believe), M5. They were both on ET streets and racing the 1/4. The Z28 would straight stomp that Mach1 though, By at least 6+ cars everytime. I know they were both tuned and that the Z28 had 461rwhp and 441rwtq. But people are usually saying how these two cars stock are a great race, but when it comes to modding, does a LS1 get that far ahead?
If the Mach had 3.90's in it, he's either set-up for running primarily on Nitrous or made a really bad choice when it came to selecting gears.
(Possibly both now that I see what cams the Mach is supposed to have)

3.90's are great for a sprayed 4V but I myself would go no less than 4.56's if I was planning on running N/A with a cammed/worked heads 4V.

I would also like to know the intake manifold that is on that car - the stock intake manifold doesn't like to make good power past 6300/6400 rpm due to it's relatively short 11" runners.

11" runners + stage III cams = engine combo that isn't even close to making it's best rwhp.

Originally Posted by RED04Z06
Sorry!!!, Forgot to mention Z28 did have a 90/90 set-up, and the Mach also had an intake also. I remember I was forgetting something about the two cars. And the Mach has Stage 3 cams, that is all I know.
By "intake", do you mean a cold-air intake or an aftermarket intake manifold?

Last edited by Angus66; 01-24-2007 at 12:11 AM.
Angus66 is offline  
Old 01-24-2007, 12:37 AM
  #17  
Tech Resident
 
ChocoTaco369's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Philly
Posts: 5,117
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mach1Mustang
wow you are so right. the sc cobras suck......
when you mod anything it comes out to how much you want to spend, the ls1 is much cheaper to mod, so it can make more power cheaply.
wow. are you being serious? you're going to talk about SUPERCHARGED cobras? throw a similar blower on an LS1 and run it at the same psi (assume the LS1 bottom end can take it). what happens? can you say "cobra gets annihilated"? were you making a joke? i'll assume so. a procharged LS1 will make a lot more power than a cobra at a greater psi. now throw in a blower cam - which we have WAY MORE VARIETIES OF - and the gap widens even more. then come new heads and the LS1's displacement comes into even more of an advantage. just give up.
ChocoTaco369 is offline  
Old 01-24-2007, 06:41 AM
  #18  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Omega Doom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: DFW,TX
Posts: 1,529
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ponygt65
It is becuase of the 'modular' design. They do not utilize the cams like a pushrod does. Not to mention, there are ALOT more options out there for pushrods cams than there is Mod cams.

Pending setup...that mach could be as low as 350 RWHP, and as high as 400+ RWHP. Either way. A 281 CID Mod motor isn't going to see 450+ RWHP N/A "very easily", if at all.

Basically: Design differences.

rk - no need to get ugly.
I have yet to see or hear about a Mach1 making 400rwhp??? and it's funny to see even on a LS1 based website the mustang is defended and honored! to all you stang fanatic's looking at this thread, they are trying to organize a LS1 vs stang shootout in the DFW area so either "let your nuts hang or stuff them in your mouth!"
Omega Doom is offline  
Old 01-24-2007, 07:56 AM
  #19  
Teching In
 
WRX-ERROR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Wilkes Barre, Pa
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Saying a H/C anything really doesn't paint a good picture. Take two stock ls1's and put two different h/c combo and the difference could be 2 to 3 cars easy.

Besides, without FI it all comes down to pure displacement and the ls1 has a lot more of it.
WRX-ERROR is offline  
Old 01-24-2007, 08:07 AM
  #20  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ChocoTaco369
wow. are you being serious? you're going to talk about SUPERCHARGED cobras? throw a similar blower on an LS1 and run it at the same psi (assume the LS1 bottom end can take it). what happens? can you say "cobra gets annihilated"? were you making a joke? i'll assume so. a procharged LS1 will make a lot more power than a cobra at a greater psi. now throw in a blower cam - which we have WAY MORE VARIETIES OF - and the gap widens even more. then come new heads and the LS1's displacement comes into even more of an advantage. just give up.
*Whiney baby voice* But he has a supercharger... I want a supercharger... *Whiney baby voice*
Irunelevens is offline  



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:00 AM.