BlackBirds

iTrader: (24)

My question is plain and simple. Is chrome moly for suspension parts worth the price over mild steel? I'm looking to purchase a UMI adjustable torque arm for my '02 T/A and it costs $85 more for the chrome moly version. Is this version truly lighter? And is the weight reduction worth it and the "added strength"? Also, will the mild steel eventually rust while the chrome moly wont?

Thanks for any input guys.

chevystyle

iTrader: (1)

My understanding is chrome moly is softer, quieter and street friendly where as mild steel is stiffer, noisier, and has very little deflection(<----I think that's the right word) under load

99Bluz28

iTrader: (35)

The Chrome-Moly is stronger than the same thickness of mild steel, so a thinner wall thickness can be used for the same strength. The main benefit is saving weight. If you feel that every little once of weight savings is a must, then it's worth it, otherwise get the mild steel and save the $85.

PUNISHER TA

iTrader: (13)

Not that it'll be important for your TA... but for LCAs, the chrome moly tubing is usually 1.25 VS 1.625.

So you gain about an 1/8" clearance for your tire

UMI Sales

iTrader: (1)

Hello
Thanks for considering UMI Performance! The difference between chrome moly and mild steel is not only the weight savings but also tinsel strength. If you are looking for weight savings chrome moly is the way to go. If you are just looking to upgrade for street use mild steel will be just fine. If you have any other questions feel free to ask and I will be more than glad to help.
Thanks
Brad