Stock Height, Adjustable or Non LCAs?
#1
Stock Height, Adjustable or Non LCAs?
I’ve been looking into getting some new LCAs and was curious if there’s any advantage to getting adjustable ones for a vehicle that’s at stock height? I have no intent of lowering the car, and from what I’ve read the only benefit of adjustable LCAs is to change the gap between the wheel and the fender, but I don’t think that’s much of a problem at stock height.
Also, I was curious about the ends. I know you can get them solid or with poly mounts. Which is better to go with? I only drive the car 2k per year, so ride quality isn’t the biggest issue,b ut I don’t want it to suffer too much. I was also curious how often you have to grease them.
Thanks guys.
Also, I was curious about the ends. I know you can get them solid or with poly mounts. Which is better to go with? I only drive the car 2k per year, so ride quality isn’t the biggest issue,b ut I don’t want it to suffer too much. I was also curious how often you have to grease them.
Thanks guys.
#2
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
The only time you usually NEED adjustable LCA's is if you install an aftermarket rear or are installing big wheel/tire combo's that require re-centering. Otherwise, even if you're lowering the vehicle, non-adjustables are just fine.
As far as the ends, if you don't care tooooo much about your ride quality I would go with roto-joint ends from UMI. They're quieter than rod-ends, allow for full suspension articulation, and seem to be very streetable while offering good performance.
As far as the ends, if you don't care tooooo much about your ride quality I would go with roto-joint ends from UMI. They're quieter than rod-ends, allow for full suspension articulation, and seem to be very streetable while offering good performance.