are cross drilled/slotted rotors lighter then factory ls1? - LS1TECH

Go Back   LS1TECH > CHASSIS, SUSPENSION, APPEARANCE > Suspension & Brakes
Log In 
Search


Suspension & Brakes
Springs | Shocks | Handling | Rotors


are cross drilled/slotted rotors lighter then factory ls1?

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-14-2010, 03:06 PM   #1
10 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
mike c.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: mi
Posts: 4,035
Default are cross drilled/slotted rotors lighter then factory ls1?

Looking to lose some weight but can't go drag since it's a street car. I already have a tube frontend,so i'm loking at the brakes. If they are lighter,how much?? Thanks, mike c.
mike c. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2010, 05:53 PM   #2
TECH Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: nyc
Posts: 437
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mike c . View Post
Looking to lose some weight but can't go drag since it's a str eet car. I already have a tube frontend,so i'm loking at the brakes. If they are lighter,how much?? Thanks, mike c.
yes the bear rotors are lighter and better made and wont warp.
ssam98 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2010, 06:24 PM   #3
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
99FormulaM6r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: WI
Posts: 1,461
Default

I have a hard time believing that drilled/slotted rotors WONT warp. Anything drilled is more prone to cracking, and the drills and slots take structural integrity away from the solid rotor, as well as cause them to heat up faster (less material). A blank is always going to be the best choice for braking performance and durability.....but if the slight trade off is worth saving a little weight I guess it's worth it. I can't answer how much less they'd weigh, maybe google it?
__________________
1999 Pontiac Formula M6: lid - LS6 intake - GMMG - Strano bars - Koni Yellows - MGW - few other bits and pieces
2013 Ford Focus SE
2006 Suzuki SV650
2007 Yamaha TW200

GO BADGERS!!!!
99FormulaM6r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2010, 08:09 PM   #4
10 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
mike c.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: mi
Posts: 4,035
Default

Thanks. Looking for weight savings any where i can with out gutting my car.
mike c. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2010, 07:41 AM   #5
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
Element's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: WV
Posts: 1,579
Send a message via AIM to Element
Default

The inevitable problems with most drilled and slotted brake rotors aren't worth the absolutely minimal (2lbs per rotor, at most?) weight "savings" drilled and slotted rotors would give you.
__________________
'99 Trans Am M6, sounds fast but goes slow.
Element is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2010, 08:11 AM   #6
TECH Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
EchoMirage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: SE VA
Posts: 2,253
Default

youre talking ounces, if anything, 'saved' from drilled. they are stupid and only for looks, nothing else. youd lose more weight taking the floormats out then going to drilled rotors.
__________________
Alcohaulin' *** Motorsports

http://www.fquick.com/EchoMirage
2009 and 2010 LS1tech calender car
EchoMirage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2010, 09:26 AM   #7
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (7)
 
z28bryan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: MA
Posts: 3,948
Default

Probably lose more unsprung weight with lighter front wheels
z28bryan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2010, 10:14 AM   #8
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (7)
 
MasterV8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Shithole England!
Posts: 581
Send a message via MSN to MasterV8
Default

I did weigh mine when I swapped to baers & it was 2lbs per rotor & yes I bought mine for cosmetic looks.
__________________
SILVER '02SS
MTI Lid, Holley Filter, SLP Bellows,Ported TB, FTRA, TSP 1 7/8" LTs, Corsa Catback, SLP Pulley, BAER Eradispeed F/R Rotors, BMR LCAs/PHRs,Koni 4/4s, UMI K member & lower A arms, Strano springs, Hotchkis Polished Strut Brace, TSP mailorder tune.
MISC:pro 5.0.,Clear Corner Lenses,SS engine bling, Triton T3s all round.


07 C30 T5 tuned 255hp
MasterV8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2010, 03:33 PM   #9
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (6)
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: greenvile, sc
Posts: 587
Default

Unsprung weight is alot different that sprung. Also brakes are part of the drivetrain, so loosing weight in the brakes sounds like a double good deal, as long as you aren't a roadracer and need the blanks benefits.
__________________
98 Trans Am
ls3, g6x3!
t/a98 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2010, 03:56 PM   #10
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
Element's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: WV
Posts: 1,579
Send a message via AIM to Element
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by t/a98 View Post
Unsprung weight is alot different that sprung. Also brakes are part of the drivetrain, so loosing weight in the brakes sounds like a double good deal, as long as you aren't a roadracer and need the blanks benefits.
It's not that there are benefits to blanks over drilled and slotted, it's the numerous disadvantages of drilled and slotted compared to blanks; plus, as shown, it's an absolutely negligible change in weight.
__________________
'99 Trans Am M6, sounds fast but goes slow.
Element is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2010, 06:18 PM   #11
10 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
mike c.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: mi
Posts: 4,035
Default

WOW,only 4lbs. not worth the weight and money when i just replaced my brakes with factory replacemants. Thanks alot guys.
mike c. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2010, 09:59 AM   #12
12 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
spy2520's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Waldorf, MD
Posts: 3,454
Send a message via MSN to spy2520
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Element View Post
It's not that there are benefits to blanks over drilled and slotted, it's the numerous disadvantages of drilled and slotted compared to blanks; plus, as shown, it's an absolutely negligible change in weight.
Sounds like glass half full/half empty to me. But also, not only does drills/slots lower the mass of the rotor, it can give less surface area to the rotor, further reducing heat dissipation.
__________________
spy2520 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2010, 10:41 AM   #13
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
Element's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: WV
Posts: 1,579
Send a message via AIM to Element
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spy2520 View Post
Sounds like glass half full/half empty to me. But also, not only does drills/slots lower the mass of the rotor, it can give less surface area to the rotor, further reducing heat dissipation.
Yep, that's one of the disadvantages, as well as creating less swept surface, meaning less friction, meaning less braking power.
__________________
'99 Trans Am M6, sounds fast but goes slow.
Element is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2010, 03:30 PM   #14
TECH Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: nyc
Posts: 437
Default

Some one should tell GM, BMW, and the other high in car comp this info.
ssam98 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2010, 04:22 PM   #15
TECH Veteran
 
JD_AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: St.Charles MO
Posts: 4,915
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ssam98 View Post
Some one should tell GM, BMW, and the other high in car comp this info.
Here we go again
Check out their race cars that use iron rotors, you will see slotted rotors, but not drilled. While you are at it check out the major name brand brake companies and what that have to say about track use with drilled rotors (or what some say about drilled rotors in general).
Drilled rotors used to be useful back when pads expelled gas, modern day pads don't though.
__________________
'01 WS6 M6
JD_AMG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2010, 04:25 PM   #16
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (41)
 
Sam Strano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Brookville, PA
Posts: 8,526
Default

Because god knows that car companies never do anything blingy to their cars! And all those cars when raced use cross-drilled rotors. Wait... no, they don't!

Why does this subject come up a million times over? It's physics people... Drilled rotors offer less mass to deal with heat. They offer less swept area for the pads to contact. They create tubulence in the vaning of the rotor. You see no race cars (where performance sort of matters) running them for those reasons. Yeah, you see some street car with them, but then again I see Z06's come with one brake rotor running backwards too-----direct from GM.
__________________
Sam Strano
www.stranoparts.com--814-849-3450
We know how to make cars turn.... and have the 14 SCCA National Championships to prove it!

We accept online orders. We do NOT accept Credit Cards online, on purpose. We do this for your protection. If your #'s are not online they cannot be hacked.
Sam Strano is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2010, 04:40 PM   #17
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (7)
 
z28bryan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: MA
Posts: 3,948
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam Strano View Post
but then again I see Z06's come with one brake rotor running backwards too-----direct from GM.
Yeah but GM did it so it must be right...
z28bryan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Engine Weight Michael Yount Conversions & Hybrids 21 01-13-2016 04:57 PM
harmonic balancer w/o ac ldyzluvdis06 Generation III External Engine 10 11-18-2012 08:33 PM
Is texas nitrous technology(T.N.T) still around mike c. Nitrous Oxide 2 03-22-2010 04:44 PM
how much lighter is chromoly? cals400ex Suspension & Brakes 14 12-07-2008 03:54 PM
FRC(non-z06) VS Coupe C5 Weight Difference Rai Corvette Performance 13 12-03-2007 06:09 PM


Tags
brakes, cross, difference, drilled, lighter, ls1, ls1tech, rotor, rotors, savings, slotted, solo, trans, weight, works

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


 

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:18 AM.