My lightened k-memeber + homemade motormounts pics
#1
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
My lightened k-memeber + homemade motormounts pics
I just put them on the car. My SS is now 22# lighter which means it should be in the 3150# range and still has al the creature comforts.
Last edited by HioSSilver; 06-22-2007 at 12:09 PM.
#2
that actually looks kinda cool.
How long did it take you to do the k-member? Are you worried about potential strength issues? (it looks like enough is still there but Im just asking)
And what material did you use for the mounts?
Is this a dd?
How long did it take you to do the k-member? Are you worried about potential strength issues? (it looks like enough is still there but Im just asking)
And what material did you use for the mounts?
Is this a dd?
#3
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
I worked on it off and on so it took a few weeks. I'm not worried about the strength because the stock member is not welded all the way around it and my modified one is and the after market ones has way less meat through the center. There are places the modified o is stronger because it is tied together a little better. I made the mounts out of 1/4 bottom, 3/16 top and .093 tube. Yes it is a dd.
Last edited by HioSSilver; 06-22-2007 at 03:33 PM.
#7
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
It's plenty safe, I work on race cars for a living and this is sronger than some stuff we have ran with no problems. Just wanted to show you guys how to save yourself $500.
Trending Topics
#8
Kleeborp the Moderator™
iTrader: (11)
Originally Posted by HioSSilver
It's plenty safe, I work on race cars for a living and this is sronger than some stuff we have ran with no problems. Just wanted to show you guys how to save yourself $500.
#9
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Pearland, TX
Posts: 3,779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by HioSSilver
It's plenty safe, I work on race cars for a living and this is sronger than some stuff we have ran with no problems. Just wanted to show you guys how to save yourself $500.
Also, "race cars" don't have to contend with potholes, crowned roads, or other road hazards that street cars do.
-Mike
#12
I guess I dont see how taking a some material out could really cause that much of a negative difference...If you really think about it, the factory k-member is overbuilt compared to the aftermarket ones, it has more material and overall size...Im not trying to argue but if some one could actually give a good hard point as to how much the integrity of the "lightened k-member" is corrupted, maybe then I could see how it really isnt that bright of an idea.
#14
Kleeborp the Moderator™
iTrader: (11)
I know some pretty young guys that are crew chiefs on fighter aircraft...so they work on high performance, military aircraft for a living. That doesn't mean they are qualified to make engineering/design choices that could affect the safety of the aircraft. Your 16 years of experience (or "experiance" to directly quote you) doesn't mean you made the best choice for a daily driven car. I don't think what you did was warranted for the relatively small weight savings you saw, nor do I think it was a well thought-out decision. But since you are happy, that is all that matters. I'm just glad you don't live near me so I don't have to worry about your car falling apart as you drive down the road next to me.
In all honesty, if you wanted a lighter frame, you probably should have started out with a better platform.
In all honesty, if you wanted a lighter frame, you probably should have started out with a better platform.
#15
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: OMG I'm in Kansas
Posts: 819
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If we were all afraid to try new things then we would never improve.
I say go for it. If it folds up on ya you can always go back to the drawing board......if your not dead.
Good luck and let us know how it holds up.
I say go for it. If it folds up on ya you can always go back to the drawing board......if your not dead.
Good luck and let us know how it holds up.
#16
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Galveston, TX
Posts: 1,202
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by MeentSS02
I know some pretty young guys that are crew chiefs on fighter aircraft...so they work on high performance, military aircraft for a living. That doesn't mean they are qualified to make engineering/design choices that could affect the safety of the aircraft. Your 16 years of experience (or "experiance" to directly quote you) doesn't mean you made the best choice for a daily driven car. I don't think what you did was warranted for the relatively small weight savings you saw, nor do I think it was a well thought-out decision. But since you are happy, that is all that matters. I'm just glad you don't live near me so I don't have to worry about your car falling apart as you drive down the road next to me.
In all honesty, if you wanted a lighter frame, you probably should have started out with a better platform.
In all honesty, if you wanted a lighter frame, you probably should have started out with a better platform.
I love you for so many reasons.
#17
11 Second Club
iTrader: (25)
I think I'll pay the $500-600 for safety (a solid tubular piece that took years to design) when I feel the need to drop a few pounds off the front or change to a turbo setup where I need the room. I've got so much money into safety stuff and the car in general, what's another $500-600.