Suspension & Brakes Springs | Shocks | Handling | Rotors

SLP or UMI 3pt. subframes?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-10-2008, 02:16 AM
  #1  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (39)
 
94TRANS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Lewisville, Texas
Posts: 1,691
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default SLP or UMI 3pt. subframes?

which one is better? (weld in)
SLP 3pt. subframe connectors
or the
UMI 3pt. subframe connectors?

the UMI SFC's use the contole arm brackets to connect to also?
any input is welcome, im ordering soon and cant decide between the two. thanks
-Kris
Old 06-10-2008, 02:21 AM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (45)
 
Undertow74's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Washington
Posts: 1,269
Received 12 Likes on 11 Posts

Default

SLP= way to overpriced.
Best bet go with the UMI.
BMR Boxed SFC's are my choice though.....
Old 06-10-2008, 08:01 AM
  #3  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (77)
 
UMI Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Philipsburg, Pa
Posts: 5,473
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Thanks for the interest in our product.

When we designed our 3-point SFC's clearance was very critical to us. We used round tubing because it allows more bending options for a tighter cleaner fit. If you take a look at the pictures below you will see we have bent and formed our tubing to follow the contours of the vehicle floor. This allows a much tighter fit for the best possible ground clearance.

Our SFC's are also available in a high gloss Red or Black powder coat for no additional charge... custom colors are available for $20.00 extra. They can be purchased as weld in or bolt in. The bolt in version is 100% bolt in and requires no welding, grinding, cutting or drilling and can be installed in 45 minutes with basic hand tools.

If you have any additional questions please ask and I am glad to help. Thank you! Ryan





Old 06-10-2008, 02:05 PM
  #4  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
Black02SLPSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Owasso, Ok
Posts: 1,484
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Ryan, in those pictures is that car lowered at all?
Old 06-10-2008, 02:47 PM
  #5  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (77)
 
UMI Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Philipsburg, Pa
Posts: 5,473
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Black02SLPSS
Ryan, in those pictures is that car lowered at all?

I can't remember to be honest
Old 06-12-2008, 05:16 PM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (39)
 
94TRANS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Lewisville, Texas
Posts: 1,691
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

^ thanks ryan for the pics and info, i will be ordering those soon
Old 06-12-2008, 05:36 PM
  #7  
Kleeborp the Moderator™
iTrader: (11)
 
MeentSS02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 10,317
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

When I was in the market for a 3-point subframe connector, UMI didn't offer one, so I went with the SLP pieces (bolt-ins that I had welded in place). Compared to the picture above, the SLPs hang LOW. They are really big, and I don't remember them being too awfully light when I installed them.

If I had it to do over again with the options now available, I'd have the UMI subframe connectors on my car.
Old 06-12-2008, 07:30 PM
  #8  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (77)
 
UMI Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Philipsburg, Pa
Posts: 5,473
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 94TRANS
^ thanks ryan for the pics and info, i will be ordering those soon
Glad I could help, we appreciate the business. We have nothing but great reviews on this item and I am sure you would be pleased!

Steve- When ever you are ready to swap those out just let me know

Thanks guys!

Ryan
Old 06-12-2008, 08:07 PM
  #9  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
Killer_Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Patterson, CA
Posts: 858
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

umi gets my vote.
Old 06-12-2008, 08:53 PM
  #10  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Lotus289's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Toledo, OH
Posts: 519
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Hey I'm looking into getting some SFC's since I just did my T Top conversion and have a few questions.

- Is there any loss of ground clearance with these?
- Is there a HUGE strength gain going with chrome moly? My car's only a V6 and I have not intentions of upping the HP any. It's just a daily driver. So I'm wondering if I'll really have a need for the extra strength.
Old 06-12-2008, 09:02 PM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (25)
 
shoemike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Prescott, AZ
Posts: 1,283
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

i can`t count the times my slp sfcs saved my exhust.
Old 06-13-2008, 12:19 AM
  #12  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (71)
 
MrElectric03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,885
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I have the SLPs and will soon be cutting them off and buying the UMI tubulars. I really dont like the fittment of the SLPs, they are huge and hang low and take up alot of room under the car. On top of that they are more expensive than the UMIs and what do you get? You get mild steel bulky boxes that you need to paint after install to keep them from rusting. Compare that to UMIs powdercoating, better fitting, better looking, and more clearence. UMI all the way!
Old 06-13-2008, 12:27 AM
  #13  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
2002_z28_m6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Central MA
Posts: 507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I have the UMI 3 pt. UMI makes very nice stuff. Mine are bolt in and they were very easy to install.
Old 06-13-2008, 09:33 AM
  #14  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (77)
 
UMI Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Philipsburg, Pa
Posts: 5,473
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Thanks for the kind words everyone, we appreciate the support

Lotus289- There is no ground clearance lose with these SFC's, they tuck up very tight to the vehicle floor. Strength is not a issue either, the Chrome Moly set is built for the weight savings rather then additional strength. If you are not worried about 5lbs just stick with the mild steel version.

If you have any additional questions please ask. Thank you!

Ryan
Old 06-13-2008, 02:55 PM
  #15  
Launching!
iTrader: (3)
 
1slow98Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

i have the standard ones and they tuck up tight you cannot see them you have to get up close n feel underneath the car to know i have them!!! great product and def. helpped my car alot
Old 06-13-2008, 03:56 PM
  #16  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Lotus289's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Toledo, OH
Posts: 519
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by UMI Performance
Lotus289- There is no ground clearance lose with these SFC's, they tuck up very tight to the vehicle floor. Strength is not a issue either, the Chrome Moly set is built for the weight savings rather then additional strength. If you are not worried about 5lbs just stick with the mild steel version.

If you have any additional questions please ask. Thank you!

Ryan
Good to know. I do have one other question. After looking at the pics I noticed that the front mounting brackets are 1/4" plate that's welded to the round tube. Does this create any sort of weak point in the setup? I'd be afraid of having the possibility of bending the metal or breaking that weld (with my massive 165ish RWHP ) Has anyone used these over a good amount of time with a lot of HP?
Old 06-13-2008, 07:43 PM
  #17  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (12)
 
Fast_94_Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: carol stream illinois
Posts: 2,161
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

i have the umis and they are awesome.
Old 06-14-2008, 10:01 AM
  #18  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (77)
 
UMI Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Philipsburg, Pa
Posts: 5,473
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Lotus289- We have vehicles running single digit 1/4 mile times on this set-up... you will have no issues at all
Old 06-14-2008, 10:04 AM
  #19  
On The Tree
 
Pinky93's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ocala, Florida
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Very nice looking. I was leaning towards BMR, now I am not soooo convinced.
Old 06-14-2008, 11:03 AM
  #20  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Lotus289's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Toledo, OH
Posts: 519
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by UMI Performance
Lotus289- We have vehicles running single digit 1/4 mile times on this set-up... you will have no issues at all
Are you mocking me? j/k. I figured as much, but $300 is a good chunk of change for me and I wanna make sure they'll work. Hopefully I can get these ordered sometime this summer. Thanx!


Quick Reply: SLP or UMI 3pt. subframes?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:37 AM.