Wheels & Tires Forged | Billet | Cast | Radials | Slicks

315's, Wheel Spacers, Flush front wheels, PICS, etc

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-05-2011, 06:37 PM
  #1  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
kyoytey1693's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: tulsa
Posts: 805
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default 315's, Wheel Spacers, Flush front wheels, PICS, etc

I did a little homework, with pics, for all of us considering wider wheels, running spacers, or spacing out the front tires for a more flush look on our Trans Ams.

I just widened my speedlines 2", I dont have tires yet but I do have 1.25" spacers/adapters that I will be running in order to make them fit.

Just going by looks I think I will need to roll the rear inner fenders for peace of mind at least, it may not be necessary, but I am going to anyways.

I figured since the only spacers I have right now are the 1.25" I would do it on one of the front tires just to get an idea for how far it will push the wheel out. I can tell you it is WAY too far out for me but I took pics just to give everyone some ideas.

The pics you will see have the 1.25 spacers on the passenger side of the car only, for comparisons sake.

The wheels are the stock 17X9's for now until I get tires for the widened one. The tires in the pics are Hankooks and are all 275/40/17's. The car is at stock ride height.

Here is the link.

Rears











Fronts







Old 08-05-2011, 07:40 PM
  #2  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
 
Nacho SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: 805-818
Posts: 3,561
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Seeing the word "flush" in the wheel and tire section on this site is so sad

Leave that **** for the imports.
Old 08-05-2011, 08:15 PM
  #3  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (15)
 
bigj2717's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 2,062
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Nacho SS
Seeing the word "flush" in the wheel and tire section on this site is so sad

Leave that **** for the imports.
I agree the fronts look really weird to me cuz they stick out everywhere but the top of the fender
Old 08-05-2011, 08:51 PM
  #4  
TECH Apprentice
 
ChrisRZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Petaluma, Ca
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Nacho SS
Seeing the word "flush" in the wheel and tire section on this site is so sad

Leave that **** for the imports.
I don't think what the OP is trying to accomplish is the same as the import guys. He even admitted the fronts stick out to much. I have 17x9 1/2 ZR1s w/ 56mm offset on my Camaro and would love to get some 36mm offset wheels to fill the wheel well a little more. I'm using spacers myself to do this very thing. The wider track may have a slight performance advantage also...? I think it looks worse when you have wheels sunk into the wheelwells. Just my opinion... If the OP stretched a tire to narrow for the wheel, then I say we lynch him! And he probably just used the word 'flush' for lack of a better word.
Old 08-06-2011, 02:13 AM
  #5  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
kyoytey1693's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: tulsa
Posts: 805
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ChrisRZ28
I don't think what the OP is trying to accomplish is the same as the import guys. He even admitted the fronts stick out to much. I have 17x9 1/2 ZR1s w/ 56mm offset on my Camaro and would love to get some 36mm offset wheels to fill the wheel well a little more. I'm using spacers myself to do this very thing. The wider track may have a slight performance advantage also...? I think it looks worse when you have wheels sunk into the wheelwells. Just my opinion... If the OP stretched a tire to narrow for the wheel, then I say we lynch him! And he probably just used the word 'flush' for lack of a better word.
Yep Chris you pretty much nailed it. I have absolutely no intention of moving the wheels out 1.25", I'm thinking maybe .75" at the most. I will be running stock size 17X9 WS6 speedlines with 275's on the front.

Like I said in the begining the pics where only to give everyone a point of reference. And yes the word "flush" was the best one I could come up with. Is there a more correct term?
Old 08-06-2011, 11:30 AM
  #6  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (64)
 
Donohue96M6Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 3,612
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

He used "flush" not "hella flush".
Old 08-06-2011, 03:48 PM
  #7  
TECH Enthusiast
 
V68Sweep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Donohue96M6Z28
He used "flush" not "hella flush".
This, lol.
Old 08-06-2011, 06:39 PM
  #8  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (8)
 
pancho toco loco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: NJ
Posts: 902
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Are the wheels now 11.5" or 11" wide?
Old 08-06-2011, 07:07 PM
  #9  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (5)
 
guy7bmwm83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: central California
Posts: 353
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post

Default

I used a 1" adapter on the rear. I have stock 17x9 Speedlines. I hate that sunken look on the rear wheels.
Old 08-06-2011, 08:42 PM
  #10  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
kyoytey1693's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: tulsa
Posts: 805
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by pancho toco loco
Are the wheels now 11.5" or 11" wide?
If you measure the inside of the wheel were the tire will actually touch it, it is only 11". Outside to outside is about 12.375.
Old 08-06-2011, 08:43 PM
  #11  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
kyoytey1693's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: tulsa
Posts: 805
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by guy7bmwm83
I used a 1" adapter on the rear. I have stock 17x9 Speedlines. I hate that sunken look on the rear wheels.
Any issues with the tires rubbing the fenders? Did you roll them?
Old 08-06-2011, 09:44 PM
  #12  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (8)
 
pancho toco loco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: NJ
Posts: 902
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I think 3/4 in the front (18mm) and 1" (24mm) maybe less will work in the back. Id roll the outter part of the 1/4 panel and massage the inner portion just to be on the safe side. Then again all 4th gens are not equal. You have a adjustable panhard bar? If not that will help center the rear.
Old 08-06-2011, 11:59 PM
  #13  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
kyoytey1693's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: tulsa
Posts: 805
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by pancho toco loco
I think 3/4 in the front (18mm) and 1" (24mm) maybe less will work in the back. Id roll the outter part of the 1/4 panel and massage the inner portion just to be on the safe side. Then again all 4th gens are not equal. You have a adjustable panhard bar? If not that will help center the rear.
I dont have an adjustable one but it is a BMR unit with poly bushings. We'll see. I have 1.25 spacers for now. I want to roll the lips and hammer the inners for sure. Just for peace of mind. Regardless, I'm gonna make everything fit one way or another!
Old 08-07-2011, 11:40 AM
  #14  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (5)
 
guy7bmwm83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: central California
Posts: 353
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by kyoytey1693
Any issues with the tires rubbing the fenders? Did you roll them?
I am at stock height and did not roll the fenders. I have take my car up to Yosemite and have driven in a spirited manner on the twisty roads. I never have rubbed the fenders. I have also driven with some weight in the rear and have not rubbed.

I believe the axle has about 4" of movement up to the bump stops. Even if the axle was riding the bump stops, the tires would not touch the edge of the fender at the rear.
Old 08-07-2011, 05:11 PM
  #15  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
kyoytey1693's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: tulsa
Posts: 805
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by guy7bmwm83
I am at stock height and did not roll the fenders. I have take my car up to Yosemite and have driven in a spirited manner on the twisty roads. I never have rubbed the fenders. I have also driven with some weight in the rear and have not rubbed.

I believe the axle has about 4" of movement up to the bump stops. Even if the axle was riding the bump stops, the tires would not touch the edge of the fender at the rear.
That makes sense. I didnt check bumpstop clearence yet. I'm still waiting on the new tires to show up. Hopefully they will be here this week and I can get the new wheels bolted on.
Old 10-01-2011, 07:19 PM
  #16  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
 
stroked383HSR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Murrell's Inlet, SC
Posts: 1,207
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by guy7bmwm83
I used a 1" adapter on the rear. I have stock 17x9 Speedlines. I hate that sunken look on the rear wheels.
I was actually doing a search for this very thing....I hate how the rear wheels sit in the rear quarters so until i get new rims im wanting to do what you did to fill the space up and move the tire out so it looks better..

can you PM me some more pictures of your car...and where did you get the 1" spacers? to me it looks like the tires stick out just a tad to much but that may be the angle of the shot.

maybe a 3/4 spacer?


where can i find what im looking for?
Old 10-01-2011, 08:17 PM
  #17  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
 
stroked383HSR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Murrell's Inlet, SC
Posts: 1,207
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

nevermind...I found a pair just like what you got......thanks anyways!



Quick Reply: 315's, Wheel Spacers, Flush front wheels, PICS, etc



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:49 PM.