narrowed it down to 3 tires, NEED OPINIONS!!
02-19-2005, 07:42 PM
#1
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (24)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
narrowed it down to 3 tires, NEED OPINIONS!! i'm on a tight budget so here are the 3 choices i've narrowed it down to:
Yokohama AVS ES100
Kumho ECSTA MX
Falken GR Beta FK-451
what do you'll think?
my tire size is 275/40/17 and my car is daily driven in a city where it snows about twice a year for a few days, rains, and the roads are oil slick
Yokohama AVS ES100
Kumho ECSTA MX
Falken GR Beta FK-451
what do you'll think?
my tire size is 275/40/17 and my car is daily driven in a city where it snows about twice a year for a few days, rains, and the roads are oil slick
Last edited by TruBloodTransAm; 02-19-2005 at 07:47 PM.
02-19-2005, 09:14 PM
#4
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Ga
Posts: 1,654
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I would say the Yokohama ES100s. I got them on now and they are great in the rain and I actually drove a little in the snow/ice we had a few weeks ago and they were pretty good. I will be going to the AVS sports next time to see which actually last longer and perform better. The Kumho are also a popular tire and I've heard good things about them but I like the Yoko's.
02-20-2005, 08:11 PM
#5
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I had the AVS ES100's on my old '01 Mustang and I liked them a lot. They are a great tire for the price. They hooked decent and wet and dry driveability was totally fine. Road noise was little to none. I'd recommend them for that price range.
02-20-2005, 08:20 PM
#6
i work in a tire store that sells all 3 of your options. I have also had all 3 options on my car. The ES100 is a far superior tire to the other 2. the Falken is junk! The Kuhmo is a good tire as well but looses alot of points in the ugly factor. hope this helps.
Tyler
Tyler
