Interesting comparison of 32 valve v-8's I bought a new Tundra and it occurred to me there are lots of similarities between its engine and the old ZR1 engine: 1989 zr1 350 cid 3.9" bore x 3.7" stroke 11.0/1 32 valve, quad cam 375 hp at 6000 rpm 370 ft lb @ 4800 rpm 2007 Tundra 351 cid 3.7" bore x 4.0" stroke 10.2/1 32 valve, quad cam 381 hp @ 5600 rpm 401 ft lb @ 3600 rpm The difference is that one came in a $60k high end performance car, while the other came in a $23k base model truck. It's amazing how much of a paradigm shift there is in 18 years. Mike |
the 3UR-FE looks like an intresting egnine! and if its anythuing like the 1UZ-FE and 2UZ-FE it should be bomb proof! be intresting to see what a little boost could do for the Toyota plant. Chris. |
Originally Posted by chuntington101
(Post 11563011)
the 3UR-FE looks like an intresting egnine! and if its anythuing like the 1UZ-FE and 2UZ-FE it should be bomb proof! be intresting to see what a little boost could do for the Toyota plant. My Tundra ran 13.9 at 98 mph stock with only 300 miles on the odo. The biggest problem with forced induction is the computer and fueling. Nobody really knows much about how the ECU works, what are the limitations, and what the fuel system is capable of. I was considering installing a rear-mount turbo and only running 4 psi boost to be on the safe side. Mike |
Mike, i think the Toyoa engines are pretty strong! i think you should beable to stick 8-12psi at the thing! :) as you say though its the tuning thats the problem. Cheers Chris. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:57 AM. |
© 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands