The new Regal... maybe
#1
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: cleveland/dayton/cincinnati, ohio
Posts: 515
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The new Regal... maybe
http://www.autoblog.com/2009/10/16/b...s-sport-rumor/
Could have some potential, and I think it looks better than a CTS. But they need to do something about that back end. And they need to keep the trunk spoiler.
On a side note apparently Gm thinks our US designers/engineers are retarded and can't design good cars so GM they feel the need to ship out more jobs? But thats just me.
Could have some potential, and I think it looks better than a CTS. But they need to do something about that back end. And they need to keep the trunk spoiler.
On a side note apparently Gm thinks our US designers/engineers are retarded and can't design good cars so GM they feel the need to ship out more jobs? But thats just me.
#3
Wait a global company designs stuff globally? The horror!
It actually makes sense for GM to do a lot of their smaller and midsized vehicle design in China and Europe, they'll sell the majority of those kinds of cars in those markets, whereas performance cars, trucks, crossovers and other primarily American/Canadian cars can be designed in Warren.
It actually makes sense for GM to do a lot of their smaller and midsized vehicle design in China and Europe, they'll sell the majority of those kinds of cars in those markets, whereas performance cars, trucks, crossovers and other primarily American/Canadian cars can be designed in Warren.
Trending Topics
#9
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: cleveland/dayton/cincinnati, ohio
Posts: 515
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Eh, doubt it. I feel another rebadge in the works, not that thats a bad thing. I'd buy a 350HP (ish) awd Buick that weighed 3600 lbs. Hopefully no more than $30K.
EDIT: I just found somewhere online that said that the car weighed 3314 lbs
EDIT#2: And I just found another site that said it was 4000lbs, I guess we will just have to wait and see. I don't know why I'm excited for this car.
EDIT: I just found somewhere online that said that the car weighed 3314 lbs
EDIT#2: And I just found another site that said it was 4000lbs, I guess we will just have to wait and see. I don't know why I'm excited for this car.
Last edited by kozak; 10-18-2009 at 01:30 AM.
#10
Eh, doubt it. I feel another rebadge in the works, not that thats a bad thing. I'd buy a 350HP (ish) awd Buick that weighed 3600 lbs. Hopefully no more than $30K.
EDIT: I just found somewhere online that said that the car weighed 3314 lbs
EDIT#2: And I just found another site that said it was 4000lbs, I guess we will just have to wait and see. I don't know why I'm excited for this car.
EDIT: I just found somewhere online that said that the car weighed 3314 lbs
EDIT#2: And I just found another site that said it was 4000lbs, I guess we will just have to wait and see. I don't know why I'm excited for this car.
#19
i think its sweet, idk about fitting for the regal name though, id say more like a roadmaster mabe? not really big enough for that, too sweet to be called a century.
idk... when i think regal i think of my beautiful ol 86 grand national
idk... when i think regal i think of my beautiful ol 86 grand national
#20
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: cleveland/dayton/cincinnati, ohio
Posts: 515
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
http://www.autoblog.com/2009/10/30/v...-already-know/
They kept the Rear end, but it still sits like a 4x4 truck. I don't know I think it's a shape that has to grow on you... I hope.
They kept the Rear end, but it still sits like a 4x4 truck. I don't know I think it's a shape that has to grow on you... I hope.