Automotive News, Media & Press Television | Magazines | Industry News

Props for our board members

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-05-2004, 11:53 PM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
chipabba's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Kaneohe, Hawaii
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Thumbs up Props for our board members

Just wanted to give props to those in our board who made "Fastest LS1s" in Hot Rod this past issue. I was amazed to see a cam only car in the 10's !!! and a h/c combo also in the tens. Simply awesome. It just goes to show that proper planning and careful selection and combo of parts goes further than just getting the best and biggest of everything and hope it all works out.
Old 04-06-2004, 09:27 AM
  #2  
12 Second Club
 
mykdiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Washington State
Posts: 1,526
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yes, that was nice to see. The reason that cam only car was in the 10s was weight. His race weight was only 3200lbs. That is about 500 lbs lighter than the average F-Body that has a roll bar in it.
Old 04-06-2004, 12:59 PM
  #3  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
 
The Juggernaut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chicago,IL
Posts: 2,516
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by mykdiver
Yes, that was nice to see. The reason that cam only car was in the 10s was weight. His race weight was only 3200lbs. That is about 500 lbs lighter than the average F-Body that has a roll bar in it.
The cam only made 409rwhp.

It was also an M6 at 700ft above sea level.
Old 04-06-2004, 01:18 PM
  #4  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
WILWAXU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: League City, TX
Posts: 14,378
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by mykdiver
Yes, that was nice to see. The reason that cam only car was in the 10s was weight. His race weight was only 3200lbs. That is about 500 lbs lighter than the average F-Body that has a roll bar in it.
If it's that easy.. let see you repeat it Even with heads
Old 04-06-2004, 01:21 PM
  #5  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
gator's 99TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Tampa Bay
Posts: 9,971
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

10.9s with stock heads are no joke. it takes the perfect combo and some great air in most cases. in this guys case, it just took some crazy driving and a lot of power.
Old 04-06-2004, 01:21 PM
  #6  
12 Second Club
 
mykdiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Washington State
Posts: 1,526
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I can't repeat a time that slow, I have a 409 LS1 with an NX MAF system jetted for 200.
Old 04-06-2004, 01:24 PM
  #7  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
gator's 99TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Tampa Bay
Posts: 9,971
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

hmm keyboard warrior? 10.9s are just for kids right
Old 04-06-2004, 01:38 PM
  #8  
TECH Addict
 
The Guy in MY 99TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Magee MS
Posts: 2,950
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I thought there was a M6 cam only car that went like 10.8's before though?
Old 04-06-2004, 01:39 PM
  #9  
TECH Enthusiast
 
jub jub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Warner Robins, GA
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by chipabba
Just wanted to give props to those in our board who made "Fastest LS1s" in Hot Rod this past issue. I was amazed to see a cam only car in the 10's !!! and a h/c combo also in the tens. Simply awesome. It just goes to show that proper planning and careful selection and combo of parts goes further than just getting the best and biggest of everything and hope it all works out.
Not to mention...good driving!
Old 04-06-2004, 06:09 PM
  #10  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
Cheatin' Chad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: IL
Posts: 2,561
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I think the cam only car was pretty damn impressive myself. Especially if you figure hes wasn't that much slower than the H/C car.

I would like to second the congratulations to the people who made Fastest LS1's.

People like them make us all look good.
Old 04-06-2004, 06:18 PM
  #11  
pdd
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (3)
 
pdd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: dudley mass
Posts: 4,156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

wow. thats some good news
Old 04-06-2004, 11:18 PM
  #12  
12 Second Club
 
mykdiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Washington State
Posts: 1,526
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Key board warrior??? NOT! I'll post timeslips as soon as I get to the track. Let me see, a 409 LS1 11.5-1 comp, 6.0L stage II heads, milled .030, MTI R1 cam, all forged internals, 12 bolt, twin disk clutch, Holley intake, LS1 edit, pulley, lid, filter, cold air system (custom made), 2 step, window switch, NX MAF kit, etc.... Maybe I sounded a little stuck up, I never meant it that way.
Old 04-06-2004, 11:42 PM
  #13  
TECH Addict
 
Shinkaze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 2,390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

409 RWHP? NICE! :thumbs:
Old 04-07-2004, 06:21 AM
  #14  
12 Second Club
 
mykdiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Washington State
Posts: 1,526
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

UH, 409 is the cubic inches, not the HP. Take a 6.0L block out of a truck, bore it .030 over and put in a 4" stroke crank. It is actually 408.something.
Old 04-07-2004, 08:35 AM
  #15  
TECH Addict
 
Shinkaze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 2,390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

woops..... well congrats for getting into the magazine
Old 04-07-2004, 04:22 PM
  #16  
12 Second Club
 
mykdiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Washington State
Posts: 1,526
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

That is not me in the magazine, I wish it was.
Old 04-07-2004, 04:41 PM
  #17  
LS1Tech Co-Founder
iTrader: (34)
 
Pro Stock John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 44,647
Received 1,090 Likes on 718 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 01-Z
The cam only made 409rwhp.

It was also an M6 at 700ft above sea level.
01Z is the cam-only guy, and he gets mad uppps from me, nobody hits gears like Sean.
Old 04-07-2004, 06:15 PM
  #18  
12 Second Club
 
mykdiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Washington State
Posts: 1,526
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yeah, that is true, even though he has mad weight reduction, he still puts the #s down, and I can respect that!!!
Old 04-07-2004, 08:23 PM
  #19  
TECH Junkie
 
WECIV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Gulf Shores and DC
Posts: 3,877
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

What does a roll cage weigh???
Old 04-07-2004, 09:40 PM
  #20  
12 Second Club
 
mykdiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Washington State
Posts: 1,526
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

About 100 lbs. For mild steel, less for chrome moly.



Quick Reply: Props for our board members



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:28 PM.