Any advantage to running no power valve?
#2
The main disadvantage is that your part-throttle cruise will be as rich as (or close to) your WOT.
If you trailer the car to the track and don't do any street driving at all, then you'll probably be fine.
The double pumper series carbs generally trade off the power valve circuit for the main jets in order to enhance performance, but I'm not sure that you would see a linear improvement if you jetted front and rear for performance and did away with the power valve circuit altogether.
And for a car that sees any street driving, you'll be drinking gas for no reason (most likely running too rich
If you trailer the car to the track and don't do any street driving at all, then you'll probably be fine.
The double pumper series carbs generally trade off the power valve circuit for the main jets in order to enhance performance, but I'm not sure that you would see a linear improvement if you jetted front and rear for performance and did away with the power valve circuit altogether.
And for a car that sees any street driving, you'll be drinking gas for no reason (most likely running too rich
#3
The main disadvantage is that your part-throttle cruise will be as rich as (or close to) your WOT.
If you trailer the car to the track and don't do any street driving at all, then you'll probably be fine.
The double pumper series carbs generally trade off the power valve circuit for the main jets in order to enhance performance, but I'm not sure that you would see a linear improvement if you jetted front and rear for performance and did away with the power valve circuit altogether.
And for a car that sees any street driving, you'll be drinking gas for no reason (most likely running too rich
If you trailer the car to the track and don't do any street driving at all, then you'll probably be fine.
The double pumper series carbs generally trade off the power valve circuit for the main jets in order to enhance performance, but I'm not sure that you would see a linear improvement if you jetted front and rear for performance and did away with the power valve circuit altogether.
And for a car that sees any street driving, you'll be drinking gas for no reason (most likely running too rich
#5
Thanks for the reply. The car runs on e85 so it pretty much drinks fuel anyway. So far I am having trouble getting it rich enough at WOT. With the timing at 28 it is still a little lean with an 86 in the front and a 96 in the back. I am mainly trying to hit my target afr without going past a 99 jet.
#6
The fuel pump is good for 3 times the power I make. I am sure that is not the issue. My air fuel is at 12.3 to 12.5 and I would like to get it into the high 11's. I would like to get there with out having to buy another jet kit. My current one only goes up to 99, but if it is the only way I will buy a 100 to 110 kit. I was told by a well known e85 carb builder that he square jets all his carbs. Since this is the first carb I have tuned I just wanted to get some more info.
#7
Drill out your PVCR (power valve channel restrictor). That is orifice that leaves fuel in when the power valve actuates. It looks like a small jet. If it is an E85 specific carb, it should have the passages modified to flow more fuel.
As mentioned above, the "racer trick" is to block the OV circuit and up the jets. This is a poor practice for street driven cars.
As mentioned above, the "racer trick" is to block the OV circuit and up the jets. This is a poor practice for street driven cars.
Trending Topics
#8
Drill out your PVCR (power valve channel restrictor). That is orifice that leaves fuel in when the power valve actuates. It looks like a small jet. If it is an E85 specific carb, it should have the passages modified to flow more fuel.
As mentioned above, the "racer trick" is to block the OV circuit and up the jets. This is a poor practice for street driven cars.
As mentioned above, the "racer trick" is to block the OV circuit and up the jets. This is a poor practice for street driven cars.
#9
TECH Enthusiast
Drill out your PVCR (power valve channel restrictor). That is orifice that leaves fuel in when the power valve actuates. It looks like a small jet. If it is an E85 specific carb, it should have the passages modified to flow more fuel.
As mentioned above, the "racer trick" is to block the OV circuit and up the jets. This is a poor practice for street driven cars.
As mentioned above, the "racer trick" is to block the OV circuit and up the jets. This is a poor practice for street driven cars.
I also upgraded to 150thou methanol needle and seat
#11
I was lean with my e85 carb and jetted up square, but eric niefert said to drill out pvcr, did it and dropped primaries a heap. Much better on transition. I ran 96/105 on my holley e85 850. Just buy the jumbo 100-110 kit, not that expensive.
I also upgraded to 150thou methanol needle and seat
I also upgraded to 150thou methanol needle and seat
Thanks for the reply, my carb guy says I am leaving a lot on the table not doing it. It runs so good on the street the way it is I am not sure I want to even try it.
#13
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
you would not want to remove the power valve on a carb that uses them if it's a street car and the motor has to provide performance between 1000-3000 rpm, where manifold vacuum will vary greatly as the load on the engine varies greatly. The transition circuit and accelerator pump in the carb do not have the capacity/capability to do what the power valve does under those conditions.
#14
Launching!
iTrader: (51)
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Port Orange/Daytona,Fl
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
my understanding is no power valve is most beneficial on a circle track type of application where the motor basically sits within a narrow rpm range and a narrow manifold vacuum range... manifold vacuum would be high, throttle 3/4 to wide open all the time. if manifold vacuum does not change then there is no need for a power valve since it would basically do nothing it would either be fully closed or fully open all the time. and running off just 4 main jets simplifies fueling and you can control a/f ratio tighter under that specific condition.... and make the most power and most fuel economy under that narrow operating condition.
you would not want to remove the power valve on a carb that uses them if it's a street car and the motor has to provide performance between 1000-3000 rpm, where manifold vacuum will vary greatly as the load on the engine varies greatly. The transition circuit and accelerator pump in the carb do not have the capacity/capability to do what the power valve does under those conditions.
you would not want to remove the power valve on a carb that uses them if it's a street car and the motor has to provide performance between 1000-3000 rpm, where manifold vacuum will vary greatly as the load on the engine varies greatly. The transition circuit and accelerator pump in the carb do not have the capacity/capability to do what the power valve does under those conditions.
#15