dual or single plane?
11-19-2009, 07:13 PM
#1
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
dual or single plane? looking for an experienced answer...not a theory, hopefully.
What would perform better all around on a STOCK '05 5.3l with a carb and MSD 6010/6012 box- a single plane or dual plane??
It's going in a 2wd '86 shortbed.
What would perform better all around on a STOCK '05 5.3l with a carb and MSD 6010/6012 box- a single plane or dual plane??
It's going in a 2wd '86 shortbed.
11-20-2009, 08:38 AM
#2
For your application, a dual plane will provide a better signal to the carb, especially at lower rpms.[Cleaner idle, better low rpm throttle response.]
A single is designed to operate at a higher rpm range.Here's a link to the Edelbrock site. Take a look at the operating ranges of the various intakes... Some significant differences.
http://www.edelbrock.com/automotive_...lds_main.shtml
A single is designed to operate at a higher rpm range.Here's a link to the Edelbrock site. Take a look at the operating ranges of the various intakes... Some significant differences.
http://www.edelbrock.com/automotive_...lds_main.shtml
11-20-2009, 09:15 AM
#3
Teching In
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Hatfield, AR
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I concur with Old Geezer. I have a 5.3L with a Comp Cams XR269HR in my 911. I am using a dual plane with a Holley 600 cfm vacuum secondary carb. Even in a relatively light car(2800 lbs) with a relatively stiff gear (3.88), this combination performs admirably.
Ken
Ken
