Conversions & Swaps LSX Engines in Non-LSX Vehicles
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

LS3 LR4 Hybrid

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-01-2012, 08:29 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
cornracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default LS3 LR4 Hybrid

I have a Fiero that I'm looking at putting a gen III/IV LS engine in. I'd probably go with the 4T65E-HD which can't handle a ton of torque and neither can the CV shafts.

Since the drive-train can't handle a ton of torque, I'd like to maximize high RPM power rather than lower RPM lower. I don't think I could get low RPM power to hook up in a Fiero anyway.

I'd like to use an LS3 block, pistons and heads a LR4 crankshaft and connecting rods. That would result in a 4.065" bore and a 3.268" stroke with total displacement of 339 CID or 5.6L.

Is the deck height on a LR4 the same as an LS3? If not, the LR4 rods might be too short. Is the piston pin diameter on an LS3 piston the same as an LR4 piston pin? If not, the LR4 rods won't assemble to LS3 pistons.

I calculated the compression ratio (assuming the deck height matches) at 9.7:1. I'd like to run E85 and get the compression ratio really high and install a high lift / low overlap cam. What's the best way to increase compression ratio with LS3 pistons and heads, aftermarket pistons, shaved heads or aftermarket heads?

Assuming this is possible, I'm guessing this set-up would make about 410-420 hp and about 355-365 ft*lb of torque at the crank.
Old 05-01-2012, 08:35 PM
  #2  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
78novacaine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: SE Houston
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

If that is all for your power goals, you can probably get that with just a 5.3 and a cam, or even a 4.8 with cam and heads.
Old 05-01-2012, 08:43 PM
  #3  
Staging Lane
 
tb30570's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

LLT/LFX/LCS 3.6L weighs 35 less than a LS4 or LS3 and makes 300 hp 270 ftlb.
Old 05-01-2012, 08:53 PM
  #4  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
cornracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 78novacaine
If that is all for your power goals, you can probably get that with just a 5.3 and a cam, or even a 4.8 with cam and heads.
I want to run this car in autocross, so I don't want very much valve overlap. Lots of lift should be fine though. Exhaust flow is going to be limited, long tube headers and cross-tubes aren't going to fit.

Maybe my 410-420 hp estimate is low for the LS3/LR4 hybrid, but I'm thinking this set-up will make substantially more power than the LS4 at a higher RPM. I'm not interested in the LR4 because of the iron block.
Old 05-01-2012, 08:56 PM
  #5  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
cornracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tb30570
LLT/LFX/LCS 3.6L weighs 35 less than a LS4 or LS3 and makes 300 hp 270 ftlb.
The 3.6 is lighter, but the weight is in the wrong spot, on the top. That doesn't help the CG much. There have been a lot more LS swaps too, so more support out there.
Old 05-01-2012, 10:12 PM
  #6  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
 
rotor vs. piston's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 583
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by tb30570
LLT/LFX/LCS 3.6L weighs 35 less than a LS4 or LS3 and makes 300 hp 270 ftlb.
Do you know anyone making a stand alone system for these engines? Last I checked I found one person and it was insane $$$.
Old 05-02-2012, 07:52 AM
  #7  
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (5)
 
psiconversion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Brick, NJ
Posts: 1,310
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Standalone harness? We make them specifically for the GTMs which will be similar to what you are doing.

Jon
PSI
__________________

Your Source for LSX Conversion Parts!
www.psiconversion.com

Ebay Store
Facebook/psiconversion
Instagram/psiconversion

'Dont Let EFI Pass You By!'
Old 05-09-2012, 08:18 PM
  #8  
Staging Lane
 
tb30570's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cornracer
The 3.6 is lighter, but the weight is in the wrong spot, on the top. That doesn't help the CG much. There have been a lot more LS swaps too, so more support out there.
If you are looking for a lower CG, the bowtie V6 (4.3L block) or aftermarket Buick V6 (3.8L block) might be a good options. Aluminum blocks, OHV and not too much torque for your transmission.

http://www.s-series.org/htm/tech/GMP...ts/136-139.pdf
http://www.taperformance.com/proddet...?prod=TA_V3800

Another option is the L26 4.9L. This engine probably doesn't have as many aftermarket performance parts though.

Last edited by tb30570; 05-09-2012 at 08:35 PM.
Old 05-09-2012, 10:55 PM
  #9  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (4)
 
i r teh noobz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ohio
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The 4.9 Northstar? It was popular with the Fiero boys for a while. I recall seeing some with turbos a few years back.
Old 05-09-2012, 11:22 PM
  #10  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (21)
 
Verz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Wichita KS
Posts: 947
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

One issue youre going to have is the bellhousing bolt patterns are diff on the 4t65e and the ls3 block. Youll need an adaptor plate set up and with that you might as well find an alum 5.3 block and swap the internals from a ls4 to attain your weight loss goals. IMO though that work isnt worth the 85lbs or so that youll save especially since that weights over the rear wheels anyway.
Old 05-12-2012, 10:39 PM
  #11  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
cornracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by i r teh noobz
The 4.9 Northstar? It was popular with the Fiero boys for a while. I recall seeing some with turbos a few years back.
I think the Northstar is heavier than an LS engine. Not much for aftermarket anyway.
Old 05-12-2012, 10:40 PM
  #12  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
cornracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tb30570
If you are looking for a lower CG, the bowtie V6 (4.3L block) or aftermarket Buick V6 (3.8L block) might be a good options. Aluminum blocks, OHV and not too much torque for your transmission.

http://www.s-series.org/htm/tech/GMP...ts/136-139.pdf
http://www.taperformance.com/proddet...?prod=TA_V3800

Another option is the L26 4.9L. This engine probably doesn't have as many aftermarket performance parts though.
how much do these engines weigh?
Old 05-12-2012, 10:46 PM
  #13  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
cornracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Verz
One issue youre going to have is the bellhousing bolt patterns are diff on the 4t65e and the ls3 block. Youll need an adaptor plate set up and with that you might as well find an alum 5.3 block and swap the internals from a ls4 to attain your weight loss goals. IMO though that work isnt worth the 85lbs or so that youll save especially since that weights over the rear wheels anyway.
weights are about the same between the LS3 and LS4. I'm more concerned about ripping the transaxle apart with too much torque.

LS3 V8 - 415 lbs
LS4 V8 - 419 lbs
LS7 V8 - 454 lbs
Old 05-12-2012, 11:29 PM
  #14  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (4)
 
i r teh noobz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ohio
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Have you considered an Ecotec? I'm not sure how it works out with your goals, but it seems to be lighter than an LSx, even in supercharged trim, and I doubt they make enough torque to break anything. It might be a bit easier to fit in the car, too.

http://www.ecotecforum.com/forums/sh...y-Ecotec-Fiero
Old 05-16-2012, 07:33 AM
  #15  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
cornracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by i r teh noobz
Have you considered an Ecotec? I'm not sure how it works out with your goals, but it seems to be lighter than an LSx, even in supercharged trim, and I doubt they make enough torque to break anything. It might be a bit easier to fit in the car, too.

http://www.ecotecforum.com/forums/sh...y-Ecotec-Fiero
I thought about it.

The supercharged LSJ has a pretty linear power curve which is good for autocross. The problem is the supercharger, inner-cooler, heat-exchanger, water pump and coolant add about 110 lb to the Ecotec. A higher powered aluminum block V6 probably weighs about the same.
2007 Cobalt SS 2.4L 2815lb
2007 Cobalt SS S/C 2925lb
I don't know as much about the weight on the LNF turbo version with it's air-to-air inner-cooler, but I'd guess it's less than the LSJ. The LNF's power curve isn't very linear, which is bad for autocross (or at least I don't like it).
Old 05-16-2012, 08:00 AM
  #16  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (50)
 
oange ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,229
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

FWIW, friend of mine put a supercharged Bonneville SSEI 3.8 into an 88 Fiero GT (?). It lloked like is was made for it.
Old 05-21-2012, 05:58 PM
  #17  
Staging Lane
 
tb30570's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cornracer
how much do these engines weigh?





Quick Reply: LS3 LR4 Hybrid



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:02 AM.