Conversions & Swaps LSX Engines in Non-LSX Vehicles
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Compression Test Question...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-11-2013, 01:05 PM
  #21  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (4)
 
i r teh noobz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ohio
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Remove the rockers and re-test. If it still fails, is pull the heads and inspect before making a call.
Old 02-11-2013, 04:08 PM
  #22  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (50)
 
oange ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,229
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

maybe burnt valves from a vacuum leak
Old 02-12-2013, 06:22 PM
  #23  
TECH Fanatic
 
oldgoat69's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Atlanta, Ga
Posts: 1,080
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Back off the valve gear to make sure that none of the valves are even a little bit unseated.
Old 02-14-2013, 09:13 AM
  #24  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
PWagon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 55
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I took all the rocker arms loose and removed pressure from the valves. I then hammered the valves with a rubber mallet like you guys suggested. Since I knew my leaks were mostly around the exhaust valves, I sprayed a very small amount of PB Blaster onto the exhaust valves to help break up any rust or gunk. I let it sit overnight, and then I retested with my leak down gauge. I was shocked at the results. You guys really know what the hell you're talking about. All of my readings came up to 10% loss or better readings. Isn't this considered acceptable? Below are my readings. I'll let you guys review them and then suggest what I should consider.

Cylinder 1 - 91/96 – 5% loss
Cylinder 2 – 87/96 – 9% loss
Cylinder 3 – 88/96 - 8% loss
Cylinder 4 – 85/94 - 9% loss
Cylinder 5 – 91/96 - 5% loss
Cylinder 6 – 84/94 – 10% loss
Cylinder 7 – 87/95 - 8% loss
Cylinder 8 – 89/96 - 7% loss
Old 02-15-2013, 06:09 AM
  #25  
TECH Fanatic
 
oldgoat69's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Atlanta, Ga
Posts: 1,080
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Looks good to me.
Old 02-15-2013, 06:43 AM
  #26  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
alocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: NW Chicago Burbs
Posts: 1,166
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Like someone mentioned before, consistent numbers are a better reference than the actual number itself. The results look good fine.
Old 02-15-2013, 07:16 PM
  #27  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (4)
 
i r teh noobz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ohio
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Bolt it in and fire it up.



Quick Reply: Compression Test Question...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:17 AM.