Conversions & Swaps LSX Engines in Non-LSX Vehicles
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

5.7 vs. 6.0l crankshaft?????

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-17-2005, 11:59 PM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
turbo69ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question 5.7 vs. 6.0l crankshaft?????

I got a 2000' trans am, engine went bad because a coolant leak in the coolant tank, so i went and got a 2000' 6.0l truck motor with very low mile to swap over. I have swap every thing from the aluminum motor to the 6.0l motor, include heads, oil pan, all front acc. and the whole intake assemly. Then i try to put it back into the car and find out the the motor and trans(auto) won't mate to each other completely and i got about 1 inch gap. It seem like the crankshaft on the 6.0l is longer than the one on the aluminum block. Anybody out there that have done the swap can help me to go around this problem????????????????????
Old 10-18-2005, 08:15 AM
  #2  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
1dirtyZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: the not so stock tribe
Posts: 3,697
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

i think gm sells a flex plate spacer that bolts to the crank , or you could get a flexplate made specifically for that (or was it a torque converter made specifically for that) , i was told the same thing when i used the iron block on my car.

maybe some one will chime in and help you more.
try posting this in the transmission section.
Old 10-18-2005, 10:16 AM
  #3  
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
 
vortec_7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I always heard that the crankshafts were the same dimensonally...Never had one side by side though. Are you sure it's not something else? Those dowel pins are a real pain sometimes.
Old 10-18-2005, 11:58 AM
  #4  
9 Second Club/LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (14)
 
Speartech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Anderson, Indiana
Posts: 1,707
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Ouch!!

You have been bitten by the "early 6.0L crank syndrome".

Lots of guys ran into that a few years ago when they were building high power setups using the iron 6.0. The 99-00 6.0's have a crankshaft that is 1/2 inch longer than all other Gen-3 engines. It's because in the beginning they were only mated to 4L80E transmissions, and this difference was needed to properly locate the 4L80E torque converter.

Later, when the 6.0 was mated to the 4L60E they redesigned the crank to be like all the other Gen 3 engines. Now when the 6.0 is used with a 4L80E, it gets the crank spacer kit.

Unfortunately you have the crank spacer that CAN'T be removed (since it was cast that way).

I don't know of an easy solution (maybe a custom torque converter that is 1/2" shorter?).

It's one of the various issues that makes the 99-00 6.0L (iron head version) less desirable.

Here's the difference in the cranks (2000 crank on the left):
__________________

91 Z28 LS2 408CI, LS9 Supercharger, LPE GT7 cam, Yank3000, 3450 raceweight.
Latest numbers: 9.71 ET, 141.42 MPH, 1.40 60' , 610 RWHP Mustang Dyno

www.speartech.com
Old 10-18-2005, 01:34 PM
  #5  
Teching In
 
haphazard6's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

i was just wondering what else about the 99-00 6.0l was less desirable?(considering i just got one for super cheap) I was planning on doing a 4" stroker kit, aluminum heads(newer 6.0l) and then mating it to a t-56 and throw it in my 1968 camaro.
Old 10-18-2005, 02:33 PM
  #6  
9 Second Club/LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (14)
 
Speartech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Anderson, Indiana
Posts: 1,707
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I don't think you'll have any problems if you're just using the block!

The issues were the iron heads, the odd ball crankshaft, and lots of piston slap complaints.
__________________

91 Z28 LS2 408CI, LS9 Supercharger, LPE GT7 cam, Yank3000, 3450 raceweight.
Latest numbers: 9.71 ET, 141.42 MPH, 1.40 60' , 610 RWHP Mustang Dyno

www.speartech.com
Old 10-18-2005, 04:00 PM
  #7  
Teching In
 
haphazard6's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

thanks for the info
Old 10-19-2005, 01:55 AM
  #8  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
turbo69ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I Also Have A Short Block(6.0l) Off A 03' Truck, Will This Short Block Bolt Right Up To The Trans????
Old 10-19-2005, 04:53 PM
  #9  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (30)
 
12secSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,690
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Why not, if possible, just swap the LS1 crank into the 6.0L engine. They interchange without a problem.
Old 10-19-2005, 06:43 PM
  #10  
9 Second Club/LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (14)
 
Speartech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Anderson, Indiana
Posts: 1,707
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by turbo69ss
I Also Have A Short Block(6.0l) Off A 03' Truck, Will This Short Block Bolt Right Up To The Trans????
Yes, that will work. If the engine came from a 4L80E application, REMOVE the crank spacer, and be sure and use a dished flexplate (LS1 or any 4L60E Gen 3 flexplate), NOT the flat 6.0L flexplate.
__________________

91 Z28 LS2 408CI, LS9 Supercharger, LPE GT7 cam, Yank3000, 3450 raceweight.
Latest numbers: 9.71 ET, 141.42 MPH, 1.40 60' , 610 RWHP Mustang Dyno

www.speartech.com



Quick Reply: 5.7 vs. 6.0l crankshaft?????



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:48 AM.