1970 Chevelle LS1 Conversion
You'll have to build/fab engine mounts from the chassis to stock LS mounts. You have to fab or have fabbed headers but GM sells the LS header flanges CHEAP so that's a good start.
Don't freak! For what a good LS1 carb manifold costs and an excellent performance carb combo (not to mention adapter TH 400 mod costs) you can easily afford to stay Fuel Injected, use a 4L60E or 4L80E and use a 5 wire hook-up stand alone PCM and wiring harness.
See my two previous posts today for more info.
Good luck man, I've had both a 1970 chevelle and a 1970 El Camino they're great cars, I'd of loved to have LS motors in em!
[/QUOTE] What are you fast guys running for camshafts? Is there a solid roller cam made yet? Please help with any suggestions. I want this car to be fast. I mean Chassis certification fast. Thank you all again.
LS v8 in Miatas,
Thanks for the recommendation. I think I'll try to do it fuel injected. What kind of manifolds are the real fast guys running?
What are you fast guys running for camshafts? Is there a solid roller cam made yet? Please help with any suggestions. I want this car to be fast. I mean Chassis certification fast. Thank you all again.
LS v8 in Miatas,
Thanks for the recommendation. I think I'll try to do it fuel injected. What kind of manifolds are the real fast guys running?
BRP makes another.
Difference lys in... Speed and Performance REQUIRES you to send your oil pan and pickup tube in to be modified(I was quoted 2xx), then you have to guy their mounts. This places your motor more forward then the BRP mounts. The BRP mounts only require a Camaro LS1 oil pan and Camaro exhaust manifolds. This places the engine pretty far back. Placement is passenger side head is 1/2 inch from the firewall. With the 6.0l and truck intank which I'm running...I have to cut a hole in my firewall because the truck intake fits soo far back.
Do you want all motor fast? Nitrous fast? Turbo(s) fast? Supercharger fast? Any of them can be done at a cost. Why not run a built TH350?
-Matt
As the Miata guy said, the TH400 won't bolt up, so the TH350 won't either. The reason for a TH400 is that I have one in the car and it's stronger than the TH350. I would eventually like to get a Procharger in the car with about 1000 horse or so. Well, anyway to get into the 9's and still drive 10,000 miles a year. I didn't know I would have to cut the firewall at all. Maybe I'll end up cutting up the Elky instead. I'll try and get in touch with those 2 companies. Thank you for all the info.
Jay
As the Miata guy said, the TH400 won't bolt up, so the TH350 won't either. The reason for a TH400 is that I have one in the car and it's stronger than the TH350. I would eventually like to get a Procharger in the car with about 1000 horse or so. Well, anyway to get into the 9's and still drive 10,000 miles a year. I didn't know I would have to cut the firewall at all. Maybe I'll end up cutting up the Elky instead. I'll try and get in touch with those 2 companies. Thank you for all the info.
Jay
Guys are using TH350's with their LS1's quite a bit from what I have read. Why not run a 6.0l with 4l80e tranny? Plenty strong in stock form and when beefed up, it takes a smackin!
-Matt
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthrea...ighlight=TH400
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthrea...ighlight=TH400
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthrea...ighlight=TH400
Question: Will the 6.0L flexplate work with the TH350/400 converter? Any year specific?
Answer:TH350/400 Converter can use a '98 flexplate.
-Matt
Trending Topics
good luck
mark
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Ps. Do the water pump and water neck outlets end up the same as the old small blocks? What kind of cooling system would I run?
There are turbo LSx cars running TH400's with 5-bolts and making 1500 flywheel HP. You will be just fine

Not sure about the Chevelle, but we did a 1986 Grand National and used the truck oil pan instead of modifying an LS1 pan. It fit just fine, but hangs a little bit lower. Yu may need to go to Speed and Performance for some motor mounts and various other things if you want to make it simple though.
PS - Lived on Oahu for 3 1/2 years
Aloha! Ps. Do the water pump and water neck outlets end up the same as the old small blocks? What kind of cooling system would I run?
6.0l= 364 ci, iron block, alum heads(these heads flow the same as LS6 heads), larger intake.
I like the 6.0l for the sheer insurence of strength. Also, if you want to bore, theirs no re-sleeving action needed.
The water pump and neck is the biggest pain in the ***! Not only is there one long fecking top rad hose, but the sizes are different from your normal Chevy rad. You can get your rad to match the outlet size, or TRY and find a rad hose(rubber) that has the different sized ends. You can also run those snazzy aftermarket hoses but I havn't found one that is black yet. The bottom rad hose is easy to do. The top is just a bitch(atleast with the 6.0l) go look under the hood of a 01+ Tahoe or pickup!
For mine (6.0l) I'm running a 4 core rad(factory one rebuilt) with a Lincoln Mark 8 fan. It will keep me nice and cool. Oh, factory tranny cooler in the rad aswell.
-Matt
I went with the BRP mounts and STOCK camaro oil pan. If your scared about the resale of your Chevelle... Go with S&P mounts. With the BRP mounts, my tranny tunnel is nice and cut up, so is my firewall. The cars future life will see quite a bit of track time. So I'm not overly conserned about going back to stock trim.
EDIT:, the firewall trimming is only needed for the truck intake! The 4l60e tranny(smaller) still needs tranny tunnel mods(T cut)
Ignore any spelling mistakes.
-Matt
Last edited by ls1_chevelle; Jun 22, 2005 at 12:21 PM.
but i believe only the 317 heads flow the ls6 numbers? and best of damn luck on the water neck hook up! Hard to connect with out looking like ***!!
Sounds sweet although!!
6.0l= 364 ci, iron block, alum heads(these heads flow the same as LS6 heads), larger intake.
I like the 6.0l for the sheer insurence of strength. Also, if you want to bore, theirs no re-sleeving action needed.
The water pump and neck is the biggest pain in the ***! Not only is there one long fecking top rad hose, but the sizes are different from your normal Chevy rad. You can get your rad to match the outlet size, or TRY and find a rad hose(rubber) that has the different sized ends. You can also run those snazzy aftermarket hoses but I havn't found one that is black yet. The bottom rad hose is easy to do. The top is just a bitch(atleast with the 6.0l) go look under the hood of a 01+ Tahoe or pickup!
For mine (6.0l) I'm running a 4 core rad(factory one rebuilt) with a Lincoln Mark 8 fan. It will keep me nice and cool. Oh, factory tranny cooler in the rad aswell.
-Matt
I'm runnign s&p mounts and truck pan...it does look a little low, but not bad!
I went with the BRP mounts and STOCK camaro oil pan. If your scared about the resale of your Chevelle... Go with S&P mounts. With the BRP mounts, my tranny tunnel is nice and cut up, so is my firewall. The cars future life will see quite a bit of track time. So I'm not overly conserned about going back to stock trim.
EDIT:, the firewall trimming is only needed for the truck intake! The 4l60e tranny(smaller) still needs tranny tunnel mods(T cut)
Ignore any spelling mistakes.
-Matt
but i believe only the 317 heads flow the ls6 numbers? and best of damn luck on the water neck hook up! Hard to connect with out looking like ***!!
Sounds sweet although!!
For now, I just want the car on the road. I'll be having a custom rad made where my top rad hose will be on the passenger side, the bottom will also be on the bottom passenger side.
-Matt
I'm runnign s&p mounts and truck pan...it does look a little low, but not bad!
Is this a Chevelle that your running this in? Cause I havent heard of anyone not having to eather cut up the tranny tunnel or having to change the oil pan.
If it is a Chevelle, how low is the truck oil pan from the ground? Thanks in advance. Remy
Regards,
Remington


