1955 56 57 Conversions Post here
thanks. Do you think that if you had left the vette pulley/accessories stock that it would've fit?
What about rear clearance to the firewall? If the engine were shifted back 1", would that help clearance? Is there room to move it back another inch?
Jeff
I think you might have another, perhaps more serious, problem with oil pan clearance. GTO engines that I have seen do not have rear sump oil pans. Even a rear sump pan and oil pick-up tube need to be modified (S&P and others can do it) but the others don't have a chance of fitting in a tri-five. They can be swapped but more $$$ involved.
The Corvette pan would not work. I don't know about GTO.
The pan that S&P modifies needs to be a Camaro Z pan (I don't know if that is different from GTO or not. A call to S&P may answer that).
Does anyone know about the oil pan clearance issues with this engine/tranny setup?
D Moss
Last edited by slow4dr; Jun 11, 2007 at 08:31 PM.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
I bought a 57 Nomad about 2 months ago, where the previous owner had installed a 2002 Camaro LS1 with matching T56 trans and a Lincoln Versailles rear end. He's got it mounted in the stock frame, and was starting to wire it up and lost interest for another project. (My lucky day!)
See the link below my signature for pics. I have a million questions to throw at you guys on some details about this that I may change...but overall the PO did a very nice job on the custom motor mounts, custom AC bracket(raising it to the top just in front of the passenger head), clutch and PCM install, etc.
My biggest concern as I map out where to start is to reconsider the use of the stock fuel tank "without baffles" which is plumbed up for a return line, and external prefilter, pump, post filter/regulator. Not sure that small tank is the way to go...considering a new tank with internal pump. I would love to hear from any of you who have some experience with external pumps and stock "unbaffled tanks" for your LSX conversions.
More to come...
Paul.
David
As noted right above...that is what I did in my '56 Chevy. I used S&P Mounts. If the frame is the same, then I suspect you'll have no problem.
Interestingly, the rear mounts are NOT used.
David
As noted right above...that is what I did in my '56 Chevy. I used S&P Mounts. If the frame is the same, then I suspect you'll have no problem.
Interestingly, the rear mounts are NOT used.
Thanks guys! Anyone have any luck selling the stock motor mounts from the original car? (Corvette, GTO, or f-body) Just wondering if there is a market for those.
About the motor mounts, I already have the adaptor plates but for the side mount, is S&P the only option or can any Chevy SBC side mount kit work?
Jeff
pop rivets and this was a great concern to me because i had to
return the pan to s&p because of it. He sent it with a broken
gasket riveted to the pan.
guess I could have bought my own. Anyway I amhaving issues
with the pick up tube. KNow that many are also. oil pressure
was okay at first but now is zero at idle.
You might try posting a specific thread on your oil pan problems. Many may not read down in this thread. I think I've seen you guys talking also out in Chevytalk. I'm watching those threads with interest.
I'll be watching my oil pressure real close when I pick mine up from the interior shop in a couple weeks. You guys have me concerned.
Hope the pressure stays good. I hope to drive it back home, and it's about 80 miles from home. It will be my first drive, other than onto the trailer to get it there for the interior and exhaust hookups.
I'm still not sure what to do but I am going to go ahead and put the pan back on tonight. I did go buy another o-ring today just to be safe. I can't decide whether to take the windage tray off like you did or just leave it on. It fits the modified pan with no problem.
Please let us know in a few weeks if your pressure was good.
Jeff
I'm agreeing with some on the other forum. If it fits and clears, seems like it should be on.
I don't remember...seems like maybe Mark made some kind of statement about "With less oil, you don't want it on".
In my case, mine is all together, and would be a drage to change. But you have time to do a little more investigation. You might consider calling Mark again, and tell him about the conflicting information you got from S&P (didn't you say one fella there said leave it on, and Mark said take it off?). He may say "Sure, if it clears everythign, leave it on".
Autokraft
Milodon
David
Last edited by diognes56; Jul 13, 2007 at 03:08 PM.
Here are some pics:
With air bags up:
With air bags down:
Ghost Flames:
Interior:
Engine






