Corvette Performance
C5 | Z06 | C6 | ZR1 | C7

How this Z hooks!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-06-2009, 11:58 AM
  #21  
Teching In
 
Pauls416Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rosulekg
I don't have the time to rehash all this again as I have done before at other sites, but, there seems to be three main types of responders to this post and for them:

1) If the 02Z gears were good overall for larger displacement constant larger torque builds then GM would have put them on the 06Z.

2) Some of you guys know Tom and or Steve, two guys in business who I have been involved with my car. They really are the some total of why I am celebrating out loud the figuring out of my car lately, but, they had nothing good to do with that!

3) Half Vettes!

-I also basically conceptualized the ZR-1 Enzo 4-years ago as well!

And for some of you which couldn't possibly know or care about what I am saying above, a kiss! and I agree:

I can only imagine what you sound like in person, thank God for the internet.

I copied and pasted it into Word and did a grammar check and my pc locked up. Seriously, read your 2nd point above to your dog out loud, I bet he bites you in the nuts.
Pauls416Z is offline  
Old 10-06-2009, 12:23 PM
  #22  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
TXZ0603's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So the ZR1 and Enzo were your idea huh?

LMAO
TXZ0603 is offline  
Old 10-06-2009, 01:07 PM
  #23  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
rosulekg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yes, Paul again from multiple sites he is my lists number 1.

The Z to go after the Enzo numbers with a roots supercharger was the original post when guys were trying to figure out what the rumored GM surprise was.
Six months later the Z turned up at the ring with a raised hood .

Last edited by rosulekg; 10-07-2009 at 09:59 AM.
rosulekg is offline  
Old 10-06-2009, 02:21 PM
  #24  
Teching In
 
Pauls416Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Rosey:

Lets just look at one thing you posted:
Originally Posted by rosulekg
2) Some of you guys know Tom and or Steve, two guys in business who I have been involved with my car. They really are the some total of why I am celebrating out loud the figuring out of my car lately, but, they had nothing good to do with that!

I'm going to go the extra mile and try to help you.....
Here is what I think you are trying to say as I break it down:


You typed:
Originally Posted by rosulekg
"2) Some of you guys know Tom and or Steve, two guys in business who I have been involved with my car."
We would type:
2) Some of you guys know Tom and Steve, who have helped me with my car."



You then typed:
Originally Posted by rosulekg
"They really are the some total of why I am celebrating out loud the figuring out of my car lately,"
We would type:
They are the reason I'm celebrating, (by posting on every f'n forum) because they figured out my car.



You then typed:
Originally Posted by rosulekg
but, they had nothing good to do with that!"
We would type:
However, Tom and Steve are idiots and didn't actually help me.



So to put it all together, any 4th grade educated American would have written your statement as:

2) Some of you guys know Tom and Steve, who have helped me with my car. They are the reason I'm celebrating, (by posting on every f'n forum) because they figured out my car. However, Tom and Steve are idiots and didn't actually help me.


Is this what you tried to say because I think Tom and Steve want to tell you to
Pauls416Z is offline  
Old 10-06-2009, 02:31 PM
  #25  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (71)
 
lemons12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Winchester, TN
Posts: 11,088
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by lemons12
Since you deleted your last one..
And you deleted it again... OP you are truly an idiot.
lemons12 is offline  
Old 10-06-2009, 03:19 PM
  #26  
Launching!
iTrader: (6)
 
XtremeBBQ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: the woodlands, TX
Posts: 295
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

this **** makes my brain hurt.

and btw, the c7 will have a internal combustion engine. so when it comes out 'that **** was my idea'.


XtremeBBQ is offline  
Old 10-06-2009, 05:35 PM
  #27  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
TXZ0603's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rosulekg
I don't have the time to rehash all this again as I have done before at other sites, but, there seems to be three main types of responders to this post and for them:

1) If the 02Z gears were good overall for larger displacement constant larger torque builds then GM would have put them on the 06Z.

2) Some of you guys know Tom and or Steve, two guys in business who I have been involved with my car. They really are the some total of why I am celebrating out loud the figuring out of my car lately, but, they had nothing good to do with that!

3) Half Vettes!

-I also basically conceptualized the ZR-1 Enzo 4-years ago as well!

And for some of you which couldn't possibly know or care about what I am saying above, a kiss! and I agree:



Why do you continue to delete this and repost it on the end of this thread?
TXZ0603 is offline  
Old 10-06-2009, 07:28 PM
  #28  
Teching In
 
Pauls416Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Wow 101 posts of pure garbage. Any chance you can post of picture of the front of your car so I'll know when I see you in my rear view mirror?? I don't need a photo of the back of your car, I'll never see it...
Pauls416Z is offline  
Old 10-06-2009, 09:12 PM
  #29  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
TXZ0603's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

again you delete you post then repost it at the bottom.
TXZ0603 is offline  
Old 10-06-2009, 09:17 PM
  #30  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (71)
 
lemons12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Winchester, TN
Posts: 11,088
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by lemons12
And you deleted it again... OP you are truly an idiot.
There it goes again..
lemons12 is offline  
Old 10-07-2009, 07:22 AM
  #31  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
allngn_c5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Western Burbs of Detroit
Posts: 6,524
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

What was this Thread about again ?
allngn_c5 is offline  
Old 10-07-2009, 09:55 AM
  #32  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
TXZ0603's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rosulekg
I don't have the time to rehash all this again as I have done before at another site, but, there seems to be three main types of responders to this post and for them:

1) If the 02Z gears were good overall for larger displacement constant larger torque builds then GM would have put them on the 06Z.

2) Some of you guys know Tom and or Steve, two guys in business who I have been involved with my car. They really are the some total of why I am celebrating out loud the figuring out of my car lately, but, they had nothing good to do with that!

3) Half Vettes speak for themselves.

-I also basically conceptualized the ZR-1 Enzo 4-years ago, as well! Yea RIGHT!!

And for some of you which couldn't possibly know or care about what I am saying above, a kiss! and I agree:


Again you deleted your post and reposted it.
TXZ0603 is offline  
Old 10-07-2009, 10:01 AM
  #33  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
rosulekg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool Relative arguments only!

I don't have the time to rehash all this again as I have done before at another site, but, there seems to be three main types of responders to this post and for them:

1) If the 02Z gears were good overall for larger displacement constant larger torque builds then GM would have put them on the 06Z.

2) Some of you guys know Tom and or Steve, two guys in business who I have been involved with my car. They really are the some total of why I am celebrating out loud the figuring out of my car lately, but, they had nothing good to do with that!

3) Half Vettes speak for themselves.

-I also basically conceptualized the ZR-1/Enzo 4-years ago. Similar to my thinking having the fastest hot rod is impossible, but, having a car being able to play with a $200+k exotic is not.

And for some of you which couldn't possibly know or care about what I am saying above, a kiss! and I agree:

rosulekg is offline  
Old 10-07-2009, 10:09 AM
  #34  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
rosulekg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Argument Paul!

Originally Posted by Pauls416Z
Wow 101 posts of pure garbage. Any chance you can post of picture of the front of your car so I'll know when I see you in my rear view mirror?? I don't need a photo of the back of your car, I'll never see it...
Don't talk about your car that way!

You know an argument is, "I disagree because".

Last edited by rosulekg; 10-07-2009 at 10:42 AM.
rosulekg is offline  
Old 10-07-2009, 11:14 AM
  #35  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
TXZ0603's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rosulekg
I don't have the time to rehash all this again as I have done before at another site, but, there seems to be three main types of responders to this post and for them:

1) If the 02Z gears were good overall for larger displacement constant larger torque builds then GM would have put them on the 06Z.

2) Some of you guys know Tom and or Steve, two guys in business who I have been involved with my car. They really are the some total of why I am celebrating out loud the figuring out of my car lately, but, they had nothing good to do with that!

3) Half Vettes speak for themselves.

-I also basically conceptualized the ZR-1/Enzo 4-years ago. Similar to my thinking having the fastest hot rod is impossible, but, having a car being able to play with a $200+k exotic is not.

And for some of you which couldn't possibly know or care about what I am saying above, a kiss! and I agree:

Deleted and reposted again.

Do you not know how to write anything diferent?
TXZ0603 is offline  
Old 10-07-2009, 11:31 AM
  #36  
Launching!
iTrader: (6)
 
XtremeBBQ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: the woodlands, TX
Posts: 295
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

1.) what does that even mean? you know more than a GM engineer? your a ******* idiot

2.) who the **** is tom and steve? your on WORLDWIDE message board and you say 'tom and steve' like we should know who they are. again, ******* idiot.

3.) what is a half vette? ******* idiot.

your old c5 vette with a TT kit does NOT mean your car can 'play' with a 200k exotic. i LOVE vettes. but your car is a plastic, shitty engineered POS american car compared to a 200k+ exotic. different ballgame, and strapping on turbos doesnt make you even in the same ballpark. you are an idiot.
XtremeBBQ is offline  
Old 10-07-2009, 11:43 AM
  #37  
6600 rpm clutch dump of death Administrator
 
J-Rod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Texas
Posts: 4,983
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by rosulekg
I don't have the time to rehash all this again as I have done before at another site, but, there seems to be three main types of responders to this post and for them:

1) If the 02Z gears were good overall for larger displacement constant larger torque builds then GM would have put them on the 06Z.

2) Some of you guys know Tom and or Steve, two guys in business who I have been involved with my car. They really are the some total of why I am celebrating out loud the figuring out of my car lately, but, they had nothing good to do with that!

3) Half Vettes speak for themselves.

-I also basically conceptualized the ZR-1/Enzo 4-years ago. Similar to my thinking having the fastest hot rod is impossible, but, having a car being able to play with a $200+k exotic is not.

And for some of you which couldn't possibly know or care about what I am saying above, a kiss! and I agree:

Ok, before I lock this thread a couple of points to the origianl poster. First, if you are going to get on this or any other message boards, then take the time to type up something that is intelligible and can be understood.

The posts I've read of yours including all the ones in this thread you've deleted are very hard to understand.

I'm glad you are ahppy with your car. Thats great.

As for why GM choose the gearing that it did for the C5, the C5 Z06, the C6, the C6 Z06, and the ZR1. If you look at each car, and what GM was trying to do along with many of the articles it actually explains the logic behind the gear selection by the GM engineers.

So, whatever question you have about gearing is already answered in the public domain if you'd take the time to look at it. Now, if you want to make assumptions, thats fine. But I think your assumptions (that I can decode from your cryptic post) are flat out wrong.
J-Rod is offline  



Quick Reply: How this Z hooks!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:05 PM.