Best cold-air kit for a ZO6
In summary, a full bolt on ZO6 will generally yield 390rwhp at the most. The heads and cam combinations are posted above.
The Donaldson Blackwing is just a filter that takes the place of the stock airbox. These generally add a decent amount of power to a stock C5 but since the ZO6 box breathes fairly well, it hasn't shown too much improvement on the dyno. It is probably the most popular filter on the C5 and that just transferred over to the ZO6. J-rod has a before and after for the Zip tie mod and he gained about 15rwhp. There are others that will argue they didn't gain much. I think some of J-rods gain was just the way he broke his car in....he drove it harder than most. Vararam has shown some gain on the Dyno as well. I'll shut up now. I hope this helps. I will be going the headers and cam route.
Disclaimer: Please realize that the information was gained from just my observations of other car owners. There is also some opinion mixed in there......your mileage may vary.
Trending Topics
Its interesting that you can see a vendor swap an airbox while still strapped to a dyno, sees a HP gains, and then says, see I just gains 15 HP. Hmm, drive off the dyno, allow PCM learning to complete, go back to the dyno & watch most of those gains disappear due to a rich condition caused by high LTFT. Some of the same vendors claim that high LTFT does not cause a rich condition at WOT. Which is incorrectdead wrong.
Someone I know was one of the members involved in the original Halltech T1-C thread. Jim Hall guaranteed 16 RWHP on the airbox. He swapped the box while still stapped to the dyno and got 8 RWHP. He drove off, put 25 miles on the car, and then went right back to the dyno. All 8 rwhp were gone. Jim also claimed a 30 degree delta between the stock box & his airbox which we have yet to see.
I found some posts from LG along this same line interesting.
The correct way to eliminate any of the error, and to find out what the real corrected hp of the engine is, would be to put the temp probe in the air stream directly in the air bridge.
The open hood/closed hood will change the intake air temp that is actually entering the engine, but it does not tell the Dyno weather station what that temp really is, for the correction factor to be adjusted by the computer to give a REAL sae corrected number.
The weather station (the box that tells the computer what temp to use to come up with the correction factor) is out side the car. Depending on where it is placed will change the correction factor. Thus the need for a seperate temp probe directly in the air stream.
Now, for any of the cold air systems that are out there, I will say that they are very good for power increases at speed. But you cannot simulate the speed that will increase the pressure in the intake, (even if only slightly) nor can they match the cool air effect that is eliminated on the dyno.
Hype is Hype, I have no dog in this hunt. But any system that takes air from the outside, rather than from under the hood will be better on the road than on the dyno. And any system that takes air from under the hood if run with the hood open, will show better on the dyno than on the road. Period.
We have seen almost a 12 rwhp increase when a Vortex Rammer is flipped over on the dyno, to take in air from other than the top of the radiator. The same "on the dyno" increase can be seen if we change from a Rammer to a Black Wing for the same reason.
The Rammer ( or any system like it) will suck HOT air from the radiator, and it will show less hp due to the fact that the engine is seeing HOTTER air, than the weather station. Which will skew the correction factor in a negative way.
Best way to dyno is to have a remote temp sensor for the Dyno Computer. Next best way is to have a dyno air filter/air bridge that will suck air from the room, to match the room air that the weather station is reading.
Summary: Intake air temp will affect the "Uncorrected" hp greatly. If the dyno cannot read the actual intake air temp, the correction factor is in error.
And any air intake/filter which takes air from outside in real road conditions will make more hp on the road than on the dyno.
Thanks
Lou G
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Nate
SAme thing with shops who set their weather station in a hot area of the shop to skew the CF, cars dyno too high.
Its not whether they are appled correctly, its how they are measured to begin with.
As far as headers go and keeping the stock exhaust: If you get just headers only and retain the factory H-pipe and cats, then you would have to cut the stock manifolds off and weld the headers into place. Basically it is all one piece from manifolds back to the exhaust. Now what a lot of vendors offer is an x-pipe with hi flow cats or offroad pipes with no cats at all. This is the way I will be going if nothing more than to get rid of the exhaust "jingle" endemic to our cars. FLP has the most complete system out there....Comes with headers, X-pipe, off road pipes, and hi flo cats. They have had issues so that is why I may not go that route. TPIS just came out with an X-pipe and Random Teck cats to go with their headers...not a bad system.
To summarize my answer to your question: you can think of your exhaust manifold and h-pipe(with cats) as one piece and the catback as another. If you want to keep the factory H-pipe and cats, there will be cutting and welding involved. If you want to replace the h-pipe and cats, it becomes a "bolt-on" operation.






