Bolt on 6 speed Camaro SS, 11.29 at 119
#23
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
Hey i told you wrong man, went and looked at the torque arm and it is in the second hole from the bottom. Not the second hole from the top. There are four holes total on the mount if anybody was wondering.
I think i am going to put the torque arm in the top hole and test it out sometime soon. I would just like to see what kind of difference it makes on 60ft's and how the car looks on the launch and hooking compared to what it does now.
From what i have read it will move the instant center higher and closer to the front causing the car to want to lift the front end more on the launch and reduce the anti squat in the rear. My car has always looked like it was lifting the rear of the car a bit.
I think i am going to put the torque arm in the top hole and test it out sometime soon. I would just like to see what kind of difference it makes on 60ft's and how the car looks on the launch and hooking compared to what it does now.
From what i have read it will move the instant center higher and closer to the front causing the car to want to lift the front end more on the launch and reduce the anti squat in the rear. My car has always looked like it was lifting the rear of the car a bit.
#25
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
#29
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
You should outrun me in the heat lol
Ideal gearing, getting the car to hook as best as you can, boltons that make the most power, lightening the car helps a ton, -da, shifting as fast as you can, all out tune.
Basically just try everything you can think of.
Basically just try everything you can think of.
#31
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
I tried it once and picked up .4 mph in the 1/4 but no et. I run a vacuum pump so its hard to do. If i can get a shorter belt it may help some.
#33
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
Hey man i did not run it this winter to try and go any faster, i know of more ways to go quicker with it now tho. I plan on running in the sealed crate engine class. I might run it again before i pull the engine out. If you got any questions let me know.
#35
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
Not sure if it was worth the money at all cause it was 800+ in the end. I want to test it at the track sometime, maybe one day i can get a good test for some people. But from what ive seen at this low of power its not worth it. I think from what you end up gaining from the vaccuum you end up giving it up with parisitic loss from spinning it.
#37
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
It ended up being the stock valve springs were worn out causing valve float. It would only misfire like that when i no lift shifted, the rpm's would rise to around 6800 even with the stock rev limiter set at 6400. All the valve springs on the intake valve side were weak, all the exhaust valve springs were fine except for one. I ordered a new set of stock springs and put in there.
I did not get any myself but there were some guys on the starting line taking pictures or videos of me, gonna see if i can find them.
I did not get any myself but there were some guys on the starting line taking pictures or videos of me, gonna see if i can find them.